Much better, thanks S2.Try this.
Not sure even the bill sponsor does. It may merely be political pandering.But does anyone believe that this is going to stop kids?
From the link:
I support the stated objective. But your well-stated skepticism seems on point.New York CNN — The governor of Utah signed a controversial bill on Thursday that will require minors to obtain the consent of a guardian before joining social media platforms, marking the most aggressive step yet by state or federal lawmakers to protect kids online.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/23/tech/utah-social-media-regulation-act/index.html
Previous efforts to appear to protect minors online have failed. Not clear to me why this new law wouldn't be circumventable by determined teens."As part of the bill, called the Utah Social Media Regulation Act, social media platforms will have to conduct age verification for all Utah residents, ban all ads for minors and impose a curfew, making their sites off limits between the hours of 10:30 p.m. - 6:30 a.m. for anyone under the age of 18. The bill will also require social platforms to give parents access to their teens’ accounts."
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/23/tech/utah-social-media-regulation-act/index.html
No rush."The legislation, which was introduced by Republican Sen. Michael McKell and passed by Republican Governor Spencer Cox, will go into effect on March 1, 2024."
Remember when Republicans championed smaller, less intrusive, less authoritarian government? It seems now voters that want political candidates for that must vote Democrat. You know, the true conservative party.