"My guess is that only a miniscule percentage of the people asking that books be banned have actually read them.
Probably about the same percentage of "Christians" who have actually read the Bible." S2 #102
I doubt those two percentages are numerically close.
I hope those two percentages are not numerically close.
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful." sometimes attributed to Seneca the Younger (c.3 BCE - CE 65)
I'm confident some in history have used religion as a tool to manipulate believers.
But it's unwise to leverage that to dismiss, condemn all believers, some of whom are surely sincere.
One of the elements of distinguishing one from the other:
Is the ostensible believer applying holy scripture to shape their own life? Or merely as justification to impose their personal will on others?
note:
Some cite the word of god, holy scripture to support a false position. "Spare the rod, spoil the child", ostensible biblical justification for child abuse.
But that quotation has only tenuous relation to the Holy Bible *.
"Spare the rod, spoil the child" is attributed Samuel Butler, a 17th-century poet, specifically to the poem
Hudibras. And at that, not about child-rearing.
*
“Whoever spares the rod hates their children, but the one who loves their children is careful to discipline them.” – Proverbs 13:24
In this Biblical context "the rod" was an instrument used by shepherds, not to punish, or even to discipline their livestock, but merely to guide them on their path.
Children need guidance, not a fat lip.