"Crooked Joe's coffers must be loaded up with cash. I wonder how much they got paid for Rigging the Election?" ~Trump #391
Apparently many, including some party to the invasion of our capitol on Jan 6 believe this, despite bipartisan agreement that it's nonsense. BUT !
As you observe here:
"without the producers of The Apprentice hyping Trump as some sort of super genius businessman he wouldn't have rec'd those millions of votes." S2 @
https://citizenvoice.us/threads/just-a-reminder.347/#post-5696
if they'll believe one, should it surprise us they also believe the other? Perhaps a course in critical thinking should be added to the curriculum in U.S. "public" (government) schools. If we had President Clinton might be late in her second term.
"There has been a moral decay in our country because too many of our leaders have traded the truth for a lie." ~ Rep. Lauren Boebert
"Among life's perpetually charming questions is whether the truly evil do more harm than the self-righteous and wrong." Jon Margolis
I'm sincerely curious whether Boebert, MTG, etc
know they are wrong but spew the rhetoric to spread their ignoble cause, or whether they're actually stupid enough to believe their own absurd rhetoric.
"We can actually dampen our forests with water that costs us nothing that will come pouring down from the north. Wouldn't that be nice? If you had dampened floors, you wouldn't have forest fires." ~ Trump on California
I agree with Trump on much of this, except:
"
water that costs us nothing". If this were the brainchild of a 12 year old child it might seem impressive.
But from a man presented as a world-class businessman it's nonsense.
Land purchase and taxation costs aside, gold in a gold mine might be said to cost "nothing". But mining it can cost $millions.
Likewise the water Trump mentions might seem to cost nothing nestled in the lakebed. But transporting it and distributing it evenly in sufficient volumes to suppress wildfire would be spectacularly expensive, cost-prohibitive in fact.
And if Trump doesn't know that, how valid is the claim that he's a superior businessman?