Florida classroom bookshelves left empty as education reform law goes into effect

Re #139 - the difficulty with things like this is defining "obscenity".

Think about a typical young adult "coming of age novel". Kids growing up, navigating their transition to high school. First crushes. That sort of thing. No sex (not even implications of such - just the sort of thing you might find in a Harlequin romance. Shouldn't be an issue. BUT if the teenagers in question are gay? Or even non-white?
 
We KNOW it's at least in part cultural, because a female sunbathing topless on a California beach may be subject to arrest, but the identical behavior at a beach in Australia is widely accepted.

We embrace, we support insult by tolerating the notion of vulgar vocabulary. Would a more egalitarian view of the lexicon diminish the issue of vulgarity?

There are several cliches our culture embodies directly from court rulings. The characterization of pornography by Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart (pictured): "I know it when I see it" (Jacobellis v. Ohio, 1964) comes to mind.
"Re #139 - the difficulty with things like this is defining "obscenity"." #141
Looks like you and Stewart share that view (along with many others).

The cliche' that comes to mind is: idle hands are the Devil's workshop. These busy-bodies have nothing better to do than worry about what others read?
They fuss about that, but the [former] president of the United States can outright lie about an election outcome, and they're silent about it ?!

Thank gosh they have their priorities, N O T ! ! ! !
 
Free Speech???

gIlyFMp.png


QUo1kKx.png





uFB2DaA.png


Tweet link : https://x.com/DerekWBlack/status/1741083053077012923?s=20

Article : https://www.cbsnews.com/news/iowa-law-banned-school-books-lgbtq-issues-blocked/

Source of pics - worth reading some of the comments

 
Not trying to tinkle on a noble parade here, but my reaction is akin to my reaction to recreational marijuana decriminalization in one State after another, despite the continuing federal prohibition.

The problem is Drug War. Culling out special favor for a popular drug like marijuana seems mainly destined to extend the broader Drug War policy.

In similar way:
"Judge found its unconstitutional breadth banned books on AP exams & "even books designed to help students avoid being victimized by sexual assault."" DWB #143
The risk here seems to be addressing the merit of book banning on a book by book basis, which doesn't address the broader issue of book banning in toto.
 
"Books and all forms of writing have always been objects of terror to those who seek to suppress truth." Wole Soyinka
"The remedy for bad speech is good speech." U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis

"Sunlight is the best disinfectant". Louis D. Brandeis
 
This from New Hampshire

New Hampshire's limits on teaching on race and gender are unconstitutional, judge says

A federal judge has struck down New Hampshire’s nearly 3-year-old law limiting what teachers can say about race, gender, sexual orientation, disability and other topics
By KATHY MCCORMACK Associated Press

A federal judge has struck down New Hampshire’s nearly 3-year-old law limiting what teachers can say about race, gender, sexual orientation, disability and other topics in public schools as unconstitutionally vague. The ruling could revive the topic as an election year campaign issue.

Republicans pitched the 2021 law as an anti-discrimination measure after the Trump administration sought to ban discussion of “divisive concepts.” It prohibits teaching public school children that they’re inferior, racist, sexist or oppressive by virtue of their race, gender or other characteristics.

Teachers found to have violated the law could face discipline including the possible loss of their licenses, and could also face lawsuits.

Educators and administrators who sued the state said they were confused about what they could legally teach. They said the law violates ....

CONTINUED
 
"unconstitutional" #148
No accusation here, merely historic context:
Sadly it's a mistake to consider this a lasting victory against the unrelenting antagonistic barrage against civilization. It's a success in a skirmish, not a victory in a war. They'll be back.

They'll all ways be back.
Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. - John Philpot Curran (1750-1817)
Yes J.P.
It never stops, because they never stop.

parabellum can cepic .... : to insure peace, prepare for war
& have a nice weekend
 
"The parent argued that the Bible contained topics such as incest, bestiality, genital mutilation, and infanticide, making it pornographic under the new definition set forth in Utah Code Ann.§76-10-1227." CtA #150
"As they say - be careful what you ask for" S2 #150

Indeed.
I confess, I'm baffled.
- They do this because they believe intruding on the rights of others is an improvement?
- They know it's wrong, but they think they can get away with it anyway?
They disgrace their own parents, and themselves. And the meager joy we gain from this? Hoist by their own petard ! - chumps -
 
Not Florida this time

Welcome to Idaho, where 13 year olds are forced to deliver their rapists baby, but not allowed to go to the library.Many libraries announced they will be an "adults-only" library because of the new law. Children are only allowed to enter the library if their parents or guardians sign an affidavit each and every time.Imagine making kids stay out on the streets all summer instead of letting them visit the library while their parents are at work. What could go wrong?

GRfzMPcXkAAMD0i


 
"Not Florida this time
Welcome to Idaho, where 13 year olds are forced to deliver their rapists baby, but not allowed to go to the library." #152
A serious wound to Article #1 of our Bill of Rights, gushing blood, and only the dagger that opened the wound to plug it.
Was news always this horrific? Or am I merely turning delicate in old age?
 

EveryLibrary Poll Finds Book Bans Are Broadly Unpopular With Voters

By Andrew Albanese

The national poll, commissioned by the nonprofit EveryLibrary Institute and conducted by nonpartisan firm Embold Research, surveyed 1,123 registered voters from August 31 to September 3. Among its key findings: some 92% of voters are aware of the current wave of book banning. And, crucially, some 75% of respondents said they will consider book bans when they vote in November.

In a release, EveryLibrary officials said the polling results make clear that voters across party lines “want to make their own choices” when it comes to what they and their families read, free from government intervention.

“It is heartening to see that this belief in the right to read—and voter support for school libraries and public libraries—transcend partisanship,” said EveryLibrary director John Chrastka. “With such high numbers of voters from all parties, persuasions, and backgrounds telling us that they support Americans’ right to read, it’s time for politicians to pay attention and stop their attacks on libraries.”

Some of the poll’s key findings:
  • Nearly all polled American voters (92%) have heard at least something about book banning.
  • Fully half of all voters (50%) believe there is “absolutely no time when a book should be banned,” while 41% think there are only “rare times” when it’s appropriate. 31% of Republican voters polled said there is “absolutely no time” when book banning is appropriate.
  • Some 75% of voters said “preventing book banning” was important to them when voting, with 43% saying it was “very important.” Only 8% think there are “many books that are inappropriate and should be banned.”
  • Just 18% of voters support banning books that focus on race or critical race theory, and only one-third support banning books that discuss sexuality.
  • Voters have favorable feelings about their libraries (69%) and librarians (66%) and their schools (53%) and school librarians (62%).
  • Some 60% of voters oppose banning books alleged to be “explicit,” such as Maia Kobabe's Gender Queer or Toni Morrison's The Bluest Eye.
  • Some 72% of voters oppose banning The 1619 Project or other works on slavery and race alleged to be “racially divisive.”
  • Some 93% of voters oppose banning well-know or classic works, such as The Handmaid’s Tale, Of Mice and Men, and To Kill a Mockingbird.

Notably, the survey included a question with a series of statements to tease out what specifically is resonating with voters in terms of this current wave of book bans. Topping the list of statements voters most identified with: that states are “introducing legislation to ban certain books and/or the teaching of different topics, such as racism, inequality, and sexuality” (50%); that “politicians are trying to block attempts to make reading material more diverse and representative of the full picture of America” (43%); and that some states are considering “charging library employees for stocking certain books” (30%).

The EveryLibrary Institute is a companion organization to EveryLibrary, a national political action committee dedicated to supporting libraries. Going back to early 2021, the EveryLibrary Institute has been tracking the surge in attempts to ban books in schools and public libraries, as well as tracking dozens of pieces of state legislation—many of which not only threaten the freedom to read but, in some cases, threaten teachers and librarians with jail time or fines for providing information to students and patrons.

The EveryLibrary poll backs up a national poll commissioned by the American Library Association earlier this year, which found that some 71% of voters oppose efforts to remove books from public libraries, including majorities of voters across party lines.

 
It's an inescapable reality that half the population is below average.
But why are they in charge of library policy?
The EveryLibrary poll backs up a national poll commissioned by the American Library Association earlier this year, which found that some 71% of voters oppose efforts to remove books from public libraries, including majorities of voters across party lines.
Then whence cometh book-banning? Tyranny by the minority, champions of ignorance?

I've never held this low end of the spectrum in particularly high regard. But if they continue to get the better of the rest, perhaps they've been misunderestimated. [pardon the Bushism]
 
- loses election, stays on board - #156
“In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve” French diplomat and historian Alexis de Tocqueville
As an individual I'm victimized.
As a nation it's self-inflicted.

President Trump's oath of office obliges him to see that the laws are faithfully executed.
He violated that oath, that's perjury.
And in this case, Trump's involvement in Jan. 6 insurrection disqualifies him from presidential office.

The United States of America collectively, is obliged to enforce its own laws.
AND where partisanship threatens the circumvention of this duty, the People should be able to rely
on the loyal opposition to maintain the legal & ethical standards of the People, and nation.

We are witness to catastrophic systemic failure here, in the Donald J. Trump Republican presidential nomination & candidacy.

It's not rocket surgery. It's "law enforcement".

Sadly, the Trump case is but one of many.

If we're not going to enforce our most fundamental laws, is it any wonder charlatans flock in to break them?
 

Oklahoma revokes license of teacher who gave class QR code to Brooklyn library in book-ban protest


Wp3Lepq.png



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

h0tpVm2.png


Or you can go directly to the Brooklyn Public Library's website.
 
Free books? e-Books @

https://www.gutenberg.org/ for text, & audio

note:
several Internet sources claim to offer free book text downloads, BUT !!
what they actually provide is not necessarily the entire text.
If you want the full text / unabridged version, best to check.
 
Back
Top