Should growing "outrage" affect how the killer is treated in law?"Chokehold death of Jordan Neely ruled a homicide as outrage grows over caught-on video subway killing" S2 #99
I understand, after the jury found the police that beat Rodney King not guilty *, the resulting L.A. riot did a reported $Billion $dollars damage. Government has law & order incentive to avoid such public blow-back. BUT !
Doesn't the ostensible good Sam that administered the choke-hold have legal right to unbiased law treatment within the judicial system as well?
- One form of treatment if the matter escapes broad public notice
- a different form of treatment following large public outcry?
That may seem prejudicial, as if I'm making excuses for the one that perpetrated the homicide. Not so. The question is asked sincerely.
S2 #100
Fine. But can choke-holds be administered safely? Or is administering such hold likely to result in fatality?
* I suspect but cannot prove this verdict resulted from "misdirection", in Law. an error made by a judge in charging a jury, but perhaps by the police' legal defense. Specifically, if the jurors could not agree unanimously on which specific club blow to Rodney King crossed the line, the line was not crossed. - piffle -
If the jury agrees that if there were 79 club blows to Rodney King, and the line was crossed somewhere between blow number 27, and blow number 34, then the jury is in unanimous agreement the line was crossed by police club blow #34.