What to call this thread?

"Every leading medical association supports trans people." #1,622
As well they should.
And while this isn't intended to undermine the virtue of this support,
as an inquiry into the dynamic of simple practice:

do these medical associations benefit from this support? Perverse incentive?
 
"I don't see how they can." S2 #1,624
A bigger tent means a larger constituency.
And embracing the cause expands political power (in a "democracy").

I discern you understand my #1,623 inquiry is not antagonistic, but rather more politically prophylactic.
If those that champion diversity are accused of doing so for self-interest, perhaps self-$gain at the expense of others, it undermines the coalition.
That's what we want to not do.
"Political power grows from the barrel of a gun." Chairman Mao: The Little Red Book
Mao-ser:
you talk like a commie.
In the United States of America political power grows from spectacular lies ... and the voting booth.
"I will build a great, great wall on our Southern border. And I will have Mexico pay for that wall, mark my words." Republican primary presidential candidate Donald J. Trump 15/06/16 www.DonaldJTrump.com
 
Over to the Supreme Court

 
1778185671165.png

In a striking act of defiance, just hours before a statewide ban came into force, Salt Lake City’s mayor moved to officially recognize the Pride, Transgender, and Juneteenth flags as city symbols. The decision highlights a firm stance on inclusion and visibility, even as restrictions on LGBTQ+ expression grow.

At a moment when debates around identity and representation are intensifying nationwide, the move signals clear support for LGBTQ+ communities and people of color—reaffirming a commitment to diversity, equality, and social progress.

SOURCE with comments
 
1778241957522.png

The Montana Supreme Court has upheld a lower court order blocking the enforcement of state policies that restricted transgender people from updating gender markers on birth certificates and driver’s licenses.

In a 5–2 decision in Kalarchik v. State of Montana, the court said the policies may violate protections against s-x discrimination under the Montana Constitution. The ruling keeps the restrictions on hold while the case continues in lower court.

The dispute began after Montana passed laws and agency rules limiting changes to identity documents. Transgender plaintiffs, supported by the ACLU, argued the policies created barriers and exposed people to harm when their identification did not match their gender identity.

The decision means transgender residents in Montana can continue updating certain state identification documents while the legal case moves forward.

SOURCE
 
Back
Top