Indeed, looks like they either go to the same barber, or each got their head caught in the same food-processor.
S2,
I don't know enough about brain development to know what the potential risk is of such training for so young a student. In any case what the picture does not show is if the kid (or the adult) has all the other training, including rules of engagement.
The U.S. is in a precarious spot. The Constitution was enshrined in law between the time the gun was invented, and when the automobile was invented. Guns & cars are both deadly weapons. But the Constitution enumerates the right to "keep & bear arms". Thus, the number of automobiles and guns in the U.S. may be about the same.
The requirement for drivers licenses is universal. The requirement for gun licenses is not.
Amending the 2nd Amendment might seem the optimal approach. That's not going to happen. So I suppose the next best is to promote proficiency, or at minimum, adequacy among gun owners.
Personally I "feel" uneasy about that video. But best case scenario it may not be so bad. Worst case scenario, the kid learns how to swap magazines, but fails to refine his marksmanship, or may not even know how to acquire the proper "sight picture" (aim).
Dark side observation #1: it's not very good training. The trigger finger never penetrates the trigger guard. The idea of swapping magazines in combat is after the magazine in the gun is empty. It's not going to empty without pulling the trigger. The training depicted in the video may be merely one step in a more comprehensive training program. But as depicted it'll displease both anti-gunners and pro-gunners alike.
If you'll pardon a further comment from the dark side: the graphic is labeled / titled: "... how a 6 yr-old thinks of using a gun, conceals, and then successfully shoots his teacher ..."
That's bias confirmation.
a) The child in the video is not operating concealed.
b) There is such thing as "shoot to wound". It's vehemently discouraged in all the training I've ever gotten.
c) The teacher survived the shooting. With adequate firearms training that would not be the case.
Finally, I'm not sure what to make of the child's thumbless operation of the slide. He may not have the physical strength, or physical size to operate the slide from the rear, with thumb grip. But in any case his thumbless slide grip may potentially block the ejection port, potentially increasing the risk of a jam. I doubt that's simply an oversight, poor training. Instead I suspect it's an accommodation of the anatomical limits of a shooter that age & size. And that's more or less the issue w/ it at all.
Bruce Willis / Die Hard / bare feet (no broken glass)