I tried a search engine query, didn't find much to support your position. You're surely welcome to post a few.
Meanwhile:
Looks to me like our allies & trade partners are generally thumbs down
on Russia.
The ethnic Polish who tried to invade the Ukraine and were defeated in 1700 have always tried to take over the Ukraine.
But it has always been Russian.
Before, during, and after WWI there were attempts by the ethnic Polish to takeover, but they failed.
In the 1990s the ethnic Polish again tried to take over, and Russia defeated them, creating the Minsk Agreement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minsk_agreements
After the Maidan Coup of 2014, the ethnic Polish of Kyiv tried again to takeover and massacre the ethnic Russian.
Which lead to the Minsk II Agreement.
But there really is no question the US bribed the 2014 Maidan Coup, and Hunter Biden was involved in delivering the cash.
This is the US propaganda version, but you can tell it is fake because it is hyping up USAID, which is our main propaganda tool.
{...
The question of whether the United States financed the Maidan Revolution in Ukraine has been a subject of heated debate and numerous narratives. In popular discourse and political dialogue, certain claims have emerged—often highlighted by verbal assertions and social media debates—suggesting that the US played an instrumental role in financing and engineering the protest movement. To address these claims, it is crucial to dissect the nature of US financial assistance to Ukraine, distinguish it from direct revolutionary financing, and appreciate the broader socio-political context that led to the Maidan protests.
The Maidan Revolution, also known as the Revolution of Dignity, took place in late 2013 and early 2014 and was driven by widespread public discontent with governmental corruption, authoritarian practices, and the failure to integrate more effectively with European institutions. While the US has had a longstanding relationship with Ukraine that involves financial and political support aimed at promoting democratic values and economic reforms, this support was not designed to finance a revolution. Instead, the funding was part of a broader strategy intended to foster long-term institutional development and empower civil society—a valuable distinction when assessing claims of direct revolutionary financing.
...
USAID, one of the key agencies involved in these financial support programs, has been focused on building sustainable democratic institutions. A notable assertion by a USAID official underscored that their mission involved supporting civil society rather than financing violent or politically orchestrated revolutions. With Thailand-like precision, these funds were allocated to activities that promoted transparency, accountability, and healthy public discourse among Ukrainian communities.
...}
https://ithy.com/article/us-maidan-analysis-zmxs0lzo
