Photos, vids, etc ....

Kentucky Baptist Pastor Arrested On Child Sex Charges: Oh and a registered Republican.
The alleged abuse occurred over a number of years. King said the victim was about 13 years old when she first met Rodgers.

NOT A DRAG QUEEN
NOT TRANSGENDER
NOT AN IMMIGRANT

1771524305437.png

Maybe spend some of those ICE billions on the real Law Enforcement.
 
One for the anti-vaxxers out there

8dec8940c8c701315ede005056a9545d
 
One for the anti-vaxxers out there

8dec8940c8c701315ede005056a9545d


The studies do prove a link between autism and vaccinations.

Vaccinations contain mercury, thimerosal, that is highly toxic and only serves to make it possible to reuse the same hypodermics over and over, without needing to be sterilized.
There is no reason to do that.
And obviously if the mercury kills pathogens, it has to be harmful to the human body also.

So why then is there not a higher rate of autism that would correlate with the high rate of mercury injections?
That is because the only people who get autism symptoms are those who have allergies to mercury.
And nearly 100% of those people do get autism.
It is just that less than 1% of the population has these allergic reactions to mercury.

All mercury does harm, but only those with allergic reactions will have persistent effects from the temporary injections.
But there is absolutely no reason to use mercury in injections at all.
It is much cheaper and easier to just have an autoclave to sterilize hypodermics.
 
The studies do prove a link between autism and vaccinations.
As always, please provide a peer reviewed article from a legitimate medical or scientific journal that supports your claim.

BTW, since 2001, all vaccines routinely recommended for children 6 years of age and younger are thimerosal-free, except for some formulations of inactivated influenza vaccine. Numerous studies have shown that there is no relationship between vaccines, either with or without thimerosal, and the development of autism or other neurologic problems in children.
 
As always, please provide a peer reviewed article from a legitimate medical or scientific journal that supports your claim.

BTW, since 2001, all vaccines routinely recommended for children 6 years of age and younger are thimerosal-free, except for some formulations of inactivated influenza vaccine. Numerous studies have shown that there is no relationship between vaccines, either with or without thimerosal, and the development of autism or other neurologic problems in children.


That makes no sense because the only reason they put mercury in vaccines is because it is so deadly.
If it did not sterilize the hypodermic, there would be no use for it.
And nothing that toxic should ever be injected into people.
 
That makes no sense because the only reason they put mercury in vaccines is because it is so deadly.
You are effing nuts. Either provide links to legitimate peer reviewed studies supporting your claims or admit that you're just pulling things out of your nether regions.

If you can't I'll take that as an admission that RFK Jr isn't the only one with a dead worm in their brain.

So over to you.
 
"Vaccinations contain mercury, thimerosal, that is highly toxic " R5 #2,567
Here's what pubmed says:

"Thiomersal, also called thimerosal, is an ethyl mercury derivative used as a preservative to prevent bacterial contamination of multidose vaccine vials after they have been opened. Exposure to low doses of thiomersal has essentially been associated with hypersensitivity reactions. Nevertheless there is no evidence that allergy to thiomersal could be induced by thiomersal-containing vaccines. Allergy to thiomersal is usually of delayed-hypersensitivity type, but its detection through cutaneous tests is not very reliable. Hypersensitivity to thiomersal is not considered as a contraindication to the use of thiomersal-containing vaccines.

If I had a binary choice I might prefer to avoid thimerosal. BUT !
The bean-counters have concluded it's better to use thimerosal to sterilize multi-dose vaccine vials than to simply package doses individually.
Nope. Not sure why, though apparently they have their $$reasons$$.

Obviously the healthcare industry isn't willing to pay the vaccine producers the difference in cost. Suppose the patients agreed to pay the difference?
That might put an end to the controversy, from practical standpoint.
" You are effing nuts. " S2 #2,572
Is that where Spanish peanuts come from?

I'm not sure we need the ad hom.

Where's the data? What's the LD 50 on thimerosal?
How far within the margin of safety are we?

My ignorant guess:
while sub-Q injection of ethyl Mercury seems sub-optimal to this layman, going full blown anti-vax may be worse. AND !

While there's not much wrong with slaying a dragon here or there, we may have more formidable monsters to contend with.
Those that aren't alarmed enough by the proliferation of nano-plastics in our environment, in our human bodies, may wish to investigate the proliferation of micro-plastics.
3 of 4 Mom's have it gushing from her nozzles.

The breast milk samples were taken from 34 healthy mothers, a week after giving birth in Rome, Italy. Microplastics were detected in 75% of them.
 
red hat / MAGA

In the good ol' days a "red cap" was a guy that would help move passenger luggage at a railroad station.

For those that think Trump is only destroying traditions between our allies, our trade partners, think again.

View attachment 4146

&
Inspired by the red hat identifier:


"May those who love us, love us
And those that don't love us, May God turn their hearts;
And if he doesn't turn their hearts May he turn their ankles
so we'll know them by their limping" Old Gaelic Blessing (& toast, I suspect)
 
Here's what pubmed says:

"Thiomersal, also called thimerosal, is an ethyl mercury derivative used as a preservative to prevent bacterial contamination of multidose vaccine vials after they have been opened. Exposure to low doses of thiomersal has essentially been associated with hypersensitivity reactions. Nevertheless there is no evidence that allergy to thiomersal could be induced by thiomersal-containing vaccines. Allergy to thiomersal is usually of delayed-hypersensitivity type, but its detection through cutaneous tests is not very reliable. Hypersensitivity to thiomersal is not considered as a contraindication to the use of thiomersal-containing vaccines.

If I had a binary choice I might prefer to avoid thimerosal. BUT !
The bean-counters have concluded it's better to use thimerosal to sterilize multi-dose vaccine vials than to simply package doses individually.
Nope. Not sure why, though apparently they have their $$reasons$$.

Obviously the healthcare industry isn't willing to pay the vaccine producers the difference in cost. Suppose the patients agreed to pay the difference?
That might put an end to the controversy, from practical standpoint.

Is that where Spanish peanuts come from?

I'm not sure we need the ad hom.

Where's the data? What's the LD 50 on thimerosal?
How far within the margin of safety are we?

My ignorant guess:
while sub-Q injection of ethyl Mercury seems sub-optimal to this layman, going full blown anti-vax may be worse. AND !

While there's not much wrong with slaying a dragon here or there, we may have more formidable monsters to contend with.
Those that aren't alarmed enough by the proliferation of nano-plastics in our environment, in our human bodies, may wish to investigate the proliferation of micro-plastics.
3 of 4 Mom's have it gushing from her nozzles.

The breast milk samples were taken from 34 healthy mothers, a week after giving birth in Rome, Italy. Microplastics were detected in 75% of them.

When it says, "Nevertheless there is no evidence that allergy to thiomersal could be induced by thiomersal-containing vaccines. "
That is true.
The allergy is not caused by the thiomersal.
The allergy has to already exist.
And the pre-existing allergy is simply being triggered to cause its harmful response by the addition of the mercury.

But there is no need for the mercury at all.
While packaging in single doses eliminates the need for the mercury disinfectant, sterilizing the needles between patients does it as well.
And there really is no cost at all associated with that, except what it takes to keep a pot of water boiling at the vaccine distribution center.

Comparing it with microplastics is not fair because microplastics are not known to be deadly like mercury is.
We use mercury as a disinfectant because of its known deadly effects.
No one would try to use microplastics as a disinfectant because they are fairly inert in comparison.
 
"The allergy is not caused by the thiomersal.
The allergy has to already exist." R5 #2,575
That's different from poison.
Guzzle a liter of gasoline, and look forward to a short and uncomfortable life.
That's not merely for a tiny fraction of the population. It's universal, 100%. Gasoline is "poison".
Vaccine may indeed prove a negative for a small % of millions of population. Generally the scientific medical consensus is, on basis of overwhelming utilitarian benefit (greatest benefit to largest %population) vaccine is worth the risk.

What % population has this thimerosal allergy?
What % population is susceptible to the disease the vaccine helps protect the patient from?

Do the math ?

"Comparing it with microplastics is not fair because microplastics are not known to be deadly like mercury is." R5 #2,575
There are (mis)interpretations of my #2,573 which are disputable. Exclude those.
My comment simply addressed issues to worry about. If you prefer worrying about Martian invaders, that's fine.
 
That's different from poison.
Guzzle a liter of gasoline, and look forward to a short and uncomfortable life.
That's not merely for a tiny fraction of the population. It's universal, 100%. Gasoline is "poison".
Vaccine may indeed prove a negative for a small % of millions of population. Generally the scientific medical consensus is, on basis of overwhelming utilitarian benefit (greatest benefit to largest %population) vaccine is worth the risk.

What % population has this thimerosal allergy?
What % population is susceptible to the disease the vaccine helps protect the patient from?

Do the math ?


There are (mis)interpretations of my #2,573 which are disputable. Exclude those.
My comment simply addressed issues to worry about. If you prefer worrying about Martian invaders, that's fine.

But mercury is about 100 times more toxic than gasoline, even if you do not have the allergy to it.
It is harmful to everyone in any quantity.
But with most people it leaves the body fairly quickly, and we don't notice the harm it does to children because they are not very good at noticing and expressing side effects.

And the mercury has nothing to do with the benefits of the vaccine.
All the mercury benefits is not having to sterilize the same needle being reused over and over.
 
Still waiting for those peer reviewed studies .....

That is silly, because in order to do a study properly, you first have to know if the test base has the allergic response potential to mercury or not.
And so far, we have no way of doing that.
So we have no way of telling how many of the test base has the allergic potential or not.
That makes any study totally inaccurate and useless right off the bat.

But that is totally irrelevant.
The facts are that mercury is always BAD, even if the harm is too minute to measure.
So mercury should never have been used at all, ever.
All you have to do instead is just keep the hypodermics clean, or package the vaccine in single doses.
 
Back
Top