What to call this thread?

[Shiftless2]

I don't see how the Post Office could reduce mail in voting for only one side?

If ICE manages to discourage Democratic supporter from turning up to vote at the polls they're more likely to vote by mail. Republican supporters are less likely to be deterred from voting in person.

"As of December 24, 2025, the USPS officially changed its policy so that postmarks reflect the date a mailpiece is processed at a facility, not the date it was deposited or handed to a carrier. This change means mail dropped in blue collection boxes may receive a later postmark date than expected, potentially impacting deadlines for bills, taxes, and ballots. "

Customers who wish to obtain a postmark aligning with the date of mailing may request a manual (local) postmark at a retail location.

 

[sear]

"I don't see how the Post Office could reduce mail in voting for only one side?" R5 #1,280

Difficult to get 100%.
But long tenured postal patrons can become familiar to, recognized by their local postal workers.
And those postal workers know whether the individual subscribes to Better Homes & Gardens, or American Rifleman.

BUT !

Ballot suppression needn't only be perpetrated illegally at the post office.
Those mail-in ballots are tallied elsewhere, and may be easier to suppress than ballots cast in person at conventional election polling places.

 

[Shiftless2]

Good detail.
I have shared this with lots of people.

You might want to keep this one in mind as well

 

[sear]

You might want to keep this one in mind as well

View attachment 3870 #1,283

Fairness means applying rules equally.
Would it not then be 100% fair to prevent all women from athletic competition?

If they want to compete, let them crochet doilies, or vacuum a sofa !
[/satire]

 

[Shiftless2]

Fairness means applying rules equally.
Would it not then be 100% fair to prevent all women from athletic competition?

It's not that long ago that white female athletes were complaining about black competitors - seems they had an unfair advantage because they weren't "feminine enough".

 

[Rigby5]

So far, I have not seen ICE near polling places?
We will have to see what happens?

 

[Shiftless2]

So far, I have not seen ICE near polling places?
We will have to see what happens?

Give them time - after all, the mid-terms are still a few months away.

 

[sear]

It's not that long ago that white female athletes were complaining about black competitors - seems they had an unfair advantage because they weren't "feminine enough". S2 #1,285

We have a shameful history. Some of the most famous political rhetoric in our culture: "All men are created equal ...". The man that penned them, a slave owner.

After Lee's surrender to Grant at Appomattox April 9, 1865 both Confederate and Union troops rode trains to return to their homes. But due to the persistent racism of the day, victorious Negro Union troops were required to ride in the back of the train, while defeated White Confederate troops rode in front. Escaped slave / abolitionist /journalist / influential lecturer Frederick Douglass responded:

"We Negroes love our country. We fought for it. We ask only that we be treated as well as those that fought against it." Fredric Douglass

Makes sense.
So by WWII we had that all ironed out. Right?
The U.S. military was still segregated during WWII.

Truman didn't desegregate the U.S. military until 1948.

Regarding athletic competition:
it's competition.

Reducing the number of competitors may seem to improve the prospect of winning, among the remaining competitors.

 

[Shiftless2]

Regarding athletic competition:
it's competition.

And some competitors will be better than others. After all we don't see many (any?) 5'6" NBA players.

 

[sear]

And some competitors will be better than others. After all we don't see many (any?) 5'6" NBA players.

Understood.
For sake of analysis, if the pool against which an athlete must compete is reduced by 20%, I suspect that tends to make success more probable.

In the Trump era, doing what is right is subordinate to winning.

"We will have so much winning if I get elected, that you may get bored with winning." Republican leading presidential candidate Donald Trump - September, 2015