What to call this thread?

Rigby5 said:
I don't see how the Post Office could reduce mail in voting for only one side?
Click to expand...
If ICE manages to discourage Democratic supporter from turning up to vote at the polls they're more likely to vote by mail. Republican supporters are less likely to be deterred from voting in person.

"As of December 24, 2025, the USPS officially changed its policy so that postmarks reflect the date a mailpiece is processed at a facility, not the date it was deposited or handed to a carrier. This change means mail dropped in blue collection boxes may receive a later postmark date than expected, potentially impacting deadlines for bills, taxes, and ballots. "

Customers who wish to obtain a postmark aligning with the date of mailing may request a manual (local) postmark at a retail location.
 
Rigby5 said:
"I don't see how the Post Office could reduce mail in voting for only one side?" R5 #1,280
Click to expand...
Difficult to get 100%.
But long tenured postal patrons can become familiar to, recognized by their local postal workers.
And those postal workers know whether the individual subscribes to Better Homes & Gardens, or American Rifleman.

BUT !

Ballot suppression needn't only be perpetrated illegally at the post office.
Those mail-in ballots are tallied elsewhere, and may be easier to suppress than ballots cast in person at conventional election polling places.
 
sear said:
Fairness means applying rules equally.
Would it not then be 100% fair to prevent all women from athletic competition?
Click to expand...
It's not that long ago that white female athletes were complaining about black competitors - seems they had an unfair advantage because they weren't "feminine enough".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top