You actually think that "the team" refused?
I tried to preserve the objective presentation. Mine was not an endorsement, merely a report, as follows:
PPS
I hadn't sought this example. But as I glanced the headlines I encountered this:
Girls high school basketball team forfeits tournament rather than play against transgender player
"You actually think that "the team" refused?" S2
As a statistician you know attributing a single monolithic position to an entire sport team is problematic. There may be no two in that group that share precisely the same perspective on it.
The implication of course is that the headline is not inconsistent with either majority, or plurality sentiment within that team. But it's a report of the outcome. It's not presented as a democratic result.
Jesus' teachings did not include bigotry.
I don't know enough about it to know for certain, but I appreciate the sentiment, and trust your perspective on it more than my own.
Not sure who asserts we can always tell.
The practical complication is when for example on the telephone, low fidelity audio plus ambiguous vocal register make it difficult to identify sex.
That's not a sabotage of harsh, punitive, disparaging moral judgement.
Instead, as a result of the way English is traditionally spoken, making "sir" and "m'am" distinction is the accepted standard. Thus failing to do so may be misinterpreted.
In that circumstance what is a person to do? Guess? That's a 50:50 gamble. Omit? That may be misinterpreted as gratuitous rudeness.
It's not a cosmos-ending cataclysm.
But it's a potential problem when it arises.