Trump Gets Triggered By Looming Criminal Charges & Melts Down

Talks under way to wind down Trump cases, say reports

Story by Rob Corp - BBC News

The US Department of Justice is in talks with the office of special counsel Jack Smith over winding down the two federal cases he is overseeing against president-elect Donald Trump, according to US media reports.
Last year, Mr Smith brought charges against Trump over the alleged mishandling of classified documents and his suspected role in attempting to thwart the transfer of power after the 2020 presidential election.
But the justice department has a long-standing policy that sitting presidents cannot be prosecuted - which would apply when Trump returns to office in January.
Trump said during the election campaign that he would fire Mr Smith "within two seconds" if ....
I'm not a particularly "kill the messenger" kind of guy.
That's a stunningly unthinkable consequence for perhaps the most dangerous criminal in the U.S. today. Trump may endanger the Constitution, and our conventions of law & order more than anyone else on Earth
including Putin.

None the less S2, thanks for #580. Grim though it is, it is something U.S. citizens should be aware of.
 
"This even made the news in Canada." #582
"One of the differences between reality & fiction is, fiction has to make sense." fiction author Thomas Leo Clancy Jr.
recap:
a talentless n'er-do-well, not merely a compulsive liar, but compulsively lies in superlatives presenting a greater danger to the United States Constitution than any other entity in the solar system,
commits numerous violations of law including violations of enumerated Constitutional law, of which there are very few.
Then, lies his way though another presidential election campaign, winning by a larger margin than pre-vote polling suggested (indicating there were voters polled that intended to vote Trump, but were too ashamed to confess it to the pollsters).

And in his second term as president will have the authority to bulldoze any justice department action against him. A maniac president that is above the law, AND KNOWS IT !!

Not plausible !
Therefore by the Clancy standard, it must be true.

All that is quite, quite bad. BUT !!
It will establish a precedent which raises the alarming question: what about next time ?!

<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>

Know what?
Me turning purple about it wouldn't mitigate this. I'm going to get on with my life ... a pox on all their houses.

Anyone want to split a pie ?
 
Don't forget that Trump isn't the only individual charged over Jan 6th

Biden's DOJ Throws Wrench in Jan. 6 Defendants' Requests

Story by Gabe Whisnant


he Department of Justice said Monday that special counsel Jack Smith's decision to pause his prosecution of President-elect Donald Trump is not reason to do the same for rioters that stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Last week, Smith asked U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan for three weeks to assess how to proceed in a pending election interference case against Trump following his victory in the November 5 presidential election.

After Chutkan granted Smith's request, several January 6 defendants, including conservative journalist Steve Baker, argued the ruling meant that all criminal cases connected to the Capitol riots should be halted.

William Shipley, Baker's attorney, filed a motion Sunday to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that stated in part, "To deny this motion, in the face of the Justice Department's official position [in the Trump case], would run contrary to the interests of justice and likely subject the defendant to criminal convictions for no purpose other than expediency."

Baker's trial is scheduled to begin on Tuesday, according to court documents.

The DOJ said Monday that Trump's case was unique and didn't represent ....

CONTINUED
 
Don't forget that Trump isn't the only individual charged over Jan 6th

"After Chutkan granted Smith's request, several January 6 defendants, including conservative journalist Steve Baker, argued the ruling meant that all criminal cases connected to the Capitol riots should be halted." #584
Candidate Trump has committed to pardoning his insurrectionist co-conspirators.

My rank, my authority level in this matter barely rises to that of baffled layman / onlooker. BUT !!
From my layman's perspective I thought a primary purpose of law enforcement was public safety.
Further, I thought the more serious the crime, the higher the government priority in addressing it.

The United States Constitution doesn't address / define many crimes:
- not kidnapping
- not rape
- not murder
BUT !

Article 3 Section 3 and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment address treason and insurrection.
It appears to this lay observer / tax payer / citizen President Donald J. [If you don't fight like hell you won't have a country anymore] Trump is unmistakably guilty of this most serious crime of all.

Is there any crime in the U.S. regarded as more serious?
In this case such treachery justifies, requires swift deliberate law enforcement response. BUT !!

It's been nearly 4 years.
The U.S. government response to President Trump, the recognized criminal mastermind of the January 6 insurrection, bears the appearance of being lackadaisical, casual, indifferent.

The result: the one human in the solar system more dangerous to the United States Constitution than any more formally recognized enemy, a man that has both sworn an oath of fidelity to the Constitution, and subsequently perjured that oath,
is preparing to hold the presidency for an additional 4 year term, in direct violation of section #3 of the 14th Amendment.

How can we not perceive this as gross systemic failure?
What is the purpose of enumerating the crime of treason in the Constitution, and prohibiting civil office to such traitors
if such law is to not be enforced?

If the system, if the United States of America is that weak, that vulnerable, that fatally incompetent, then Darwinian justice indicates it deserves to fall.

- oh well -
226257849260d12d94e74cc99e45670d6db2725.gif


Have a nice day.

ref:

§2381. Treason​

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
 

Donald Trump Faces New Legal Headache

Story by Ewan Palmer

A
lawyer has filed a lawsuit against the FBI and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to force the release of special counsel Jack Smith's reports on the federal criminal investigations into President-elect Donald Trump.

Attorney Devin Stone, better known as the YouTuber LegalEagle, is suing the agencies after they rejected his Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, he said. Stone previously sought a court order to make public Smith's findings surrounding Trump's alleged criminal attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and his handling of classified documents.

Smith reportedly intends to resign before Trump returns to the White House on January 20. The prosecutor is expected to draft a final report summarizing his decision to charge Trump in the classified documents and 2020 election obstruction cases, in accordance with federal policy regarding special counsels, according to The New York Timesand NBC News.

Speaking on his YouTube channel, Stone said it is vital that ....

CONTINUED
 
At least there's some good news ...

Trump Suffers Legal Blow As NY Refuses to Drop $500M Civil Fraud Fine

Story by Kevin Scott

AA1vUoeH.img


Donald Trump in civil court

Knewz.com is reporting that President-elect Donald Trump is facing a civil fraud fine of about $500 million, as determined by New York Judge Arthur Engoron. The ruling found Trump liable for inflating his net worth, and Trump's appeal is currently under review by a New York appeals court, which questions the fine's amount. His legal team claimed New York Attorney General Letitia James overstepped her authority.

In this photo gallery, we assess James' pushback and Trump's latest news.

SOURCE
 
"... and Trump's appeal is currently under review by a New York appeals court, ..." #588
Jurisdictional overlap (federal vs State) aside, sensible laymen might assume the New York State Supreme Court is the highest law court in the Empire State.
- nope -
That's the New York State court of appeals. BUT !

Not all prosecutorial appeals in New York State occur in this highest court.

y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y what the ... y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Judge tosses Trump 2020 election case after prosecutors' request​

By Andrew Goudsward / November 25, 20247:08 PM GMT-5
WASHINGTON, Nov 25 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Monday dismissed the federal criminal case accusing Donald Trump of attempting to overturn his 2020 election defeat after prosecutors moved to drop that prosecution and a second case against the president-elect, citing Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president.
The order from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan puts an end to the federal effort to hold Trump criminally responsible for his attempts to hold onto power after losing the 2020 election, culminating in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob of his supporters.


So

"Judge tosses" "citing Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president"

applies for insurrection, but not civil fraud ?

%$#@!
"One of the differences between reality & fiction is, fiction has to make sense." fiction author Thomas Leo Clancy Jr.
It must be true. This doesn't make sense.
 

Trump loses bid to toss hush money conviction on immunity grounds

Story by Luc Cohen and Jack Queen

Donald Trump on Monday lost a bid to overturn his criminal conviction stemming from hush money paid to a porn star in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's July ruling recognizing immunity from prosecution for a president's official acts.

Justice Juan Merchan's denial of Trump's motion to dismiss the New York state case forecloses one avenue for the Republican president-elect to enter the White House on Jan. 20 for his second four-year term without the stain of a criminal conviction.

Trump's lawyers are separately trying to ...

CONTINUED (video at site as well)
 
"Trump loses bid to toss hush money conviction on immunity grounds" #590
sanity check:

As a felon, Donald Trump can no longer travel to 38 countries

By Daniel Miller / Updated May 31, 2024 10:15am CDT
Donald Trump was found guilty in his hush money trial, making him a convicted felon, which now may affect his ability to travel.
Countries globally have strict entry requirements to protect residents and maintain national security.

Citing the World Population Review, Newsweek reported that G7 nations Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan have policies restricting entry to people with felony convictions.
Israel and China also enforced similar bans, and these rules can result in the denial of visas or entry permits to convicted felons, possibly impacting the Republican presidential front runner’s ability to travel internationally, according to Newsweek.

So what is the orange Don going to do?
My brother-in-law, or in this case, brother-outlaw, spent a portion of the U.S. Vietnam War in Canada. So he can cross into Canada, but President Trump can't?

I love Canada more than ever now ! Go Leafs !
 

Federal appeals court upholds sexual abuse verdict against Trump

By Kara Scannell


A federal appeals court upheld the jury’s verdict finding Donald Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll and denied his request for a new trial.

Trump challenged the $5 million civil verdict alleging the trial judge made numerous errors, including allowing testimony of two other women who claimed Trump sexually assaulted them.

The appeals court concluded the trial judge didn’t abuse his discretion in ruling on evidence. Even if he made any errors, they said, given the strength of Carroll’s case, they are not persuaded Trump’s rights were affected to warrant a new trial.

“Both E. Jean Carroll and I are gratified by today’s decision. We thank the Second Circuit for its careful consideration of the parties’ arguments,” said Roberta Kaplan, Carroll’s attorney.

A separate jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million after finding Trump defamed her by denying the sexual abuse. Trump has also appealed that verdict.

Carroll alleged Trump raped her in the Bergdorf Goodman department store and then defamed her when he denied her claim, said she wasn’t his type and suggested she made up the story to boost sales of her book. Trump denied all wrongdoing. He does not face any jail time as a result of the civil verdict.

While the jury found that Trump sexually abused her, sufficient to hold him liable for battery, the jury did not find that Carroll proved he raped her.

Carroll filed the lawsuit last year under the “New York State Adult Survivors Act,” a state bill which opened a look-back window for sexual assault allegations like Carroll’s with long-expired statutes of limitation.

Steven Cheung – Trump’s top spokesman and incoming White House communications director – said more appeals are coming.

“The American People have re-elected President Trump with an overwhelming mandate, and they demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax, which will continue to be appealed. We look forward to uniting our country in the new administration as President Trump makes America great again,” Cheung said.

 

NY judge upholds Trump hush money conviction despite Supreme Court's immunity ruling

Josh Meyer and Aysha Bagchi

A New York judge Monday upheld President-elect Donald Trump’s felony conviction for falsifying records to cover up a “hush money” sex scandal, rejecting his claim that a sweeping recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity had nullified his Manhattan criminal case.

For now, the ruling by Judge Juan Merchan keeps in place Trump’s criminal conviction, though the former and future president, through a spokesman, immediately vowed to fight it.

If Merchan’s ruling is upheld, Trump will make history on January 20, 2025, as the first criminal felon to occupy the White House and serve as president. The judge's decision shoots down only one of several efforts by Trump to wipe clean his record of the criminal felonies before he returns to the White House on Jan. 20.

Separately, Trump has asked Judge Juan Merchan to dismiss the entire New York criminal case as a result of his November election victory. Merchan didn't rule on that argument Monday.

In his ruling, Merchan sided with prosecutors from the Manhattan district attorney’s office who said that while ....

CONTINUED
 
Federal appeals court upholds sexual abuse verdict against Trump #592
NY judge upholds Trump hush money conviction despite Supreme Court's immunity ruling #593

Since Trump has cut the cheese, a little whine to go with it:
Lay opinion may vary widely. But according to the Constitution President Elect Trump is not eligible to serve again as president.

The Constitution of the United States of America:
ARTICLE #14: Ratified July 9, 1868
SECTION 3. No person shall ... hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, ... who, having previously taken an oath, as ... an officer of the United States ... or as an executive ... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same ...

Total failure to enforce this enumerated clause of the Constitution jeopardizes the Constitution itself, & the People and nation of the United States. The president elect has publicly committed to a dictatorship on "day one", January 20, 2025. Simply that would also be a violation of the Constitution,

241231a.JPG
Refusal to enforce the Constitution in this matter establishes a whole new class of dangers.
And our legal foundation of stare decisis enshrines this madness, potentially for perpetuity,
or at least until reversed, if ever. terra incognita
“Toto, I have a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore.” Dorothy
 

Cannon temporarily blocks report on Trump classified-documents probe

Story by Perry Stein, Jeremy Roebuck

The federal judge in Florida who dismissed Donald Trump’s indictment for allegedly mishandling classified documents has temporarily blocked the Justice Department from releasing special counsel Jack Smith’s report detailing the findings of that investigation.

U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon barred Smith and Attorney General Merrick Garland from “releasing, sharing, or transmitting” the report or any drafts or conclusions from it while a federal appeals court in Atlanta weighs an emergency motion from two of the president-elect’s former co-defendants.

The co-defendants said releasing the report would unfairly prejudice them. Their motion cited a letter from Trump’s attorneys that also argued the release of Smith’s findings was not in the public interest and would interfere with his presidency and his presidential transition.

It is not clear that the report on the classified documents probe would have been released before Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, even without ....

CONTINUED
 
- No one is above the law. - cliché
ARTICLE #14: Ratified July 9, 1868
SECTION1. No State shall ... deprive any person ... within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
If Trump does not receive equal treatment under the law, doesn't that mean the rest of the U.S. population is denied their "equal protection" enumerated right?

- meanwhile -

'All hell will break out' if Hamas doesn't release hostages by inauguration​

Trump was joined at Mar-a-Lago by Steven Witkoff, who he has tapped as his special envoy to the Middle East. The two were asked about ongoing efforts to secure a deal to release the Israeli and other hostages still being held by Hamas.
"All hell will break out. If those hostages aren't back … If they're not back by the time I get into office, all hell will break out in the Middle East," Trump said.

Asked to elaborate, Trump only said: "And it will not be good for Hamas. And it will not be good, frankly, for anyone."

Well isn't that special.

Part of the problem is Trump's outsized ego motivates his need to prove himself.
Hamas is likely to know this, and has options, including murdering any hostages currently still alive. Then on inauguration day, dump the corpses in a pile on the doorstep of any U.S. embassy.

Further, the U.S. military commanders receiving an "all Hell" order may have to decide whether the order is legal or not. It is not required that U.S. military members obey illegal orders. That includes initiating an act of War.
Even if Trump's commanders try to obey such command, what are they going to bomb? Netanyahu has left little behind, except rubble. Trump's going to bomb the rubble?

Even if Trump thinks he isn't bluffing, he should have discussed this with his Pentagon liaison. More than a week before the fact, this appears to be a brutish blunder on Trump's part, amateurish.
 
Back
Top