The Second Term of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States of America

[Rigby5]

You have to remember that Ford was appointed VP after Agnew stepped down and the speculation was that he was given that role because he agreed to let Nixon walk.

{...
Spiro Agnew served as the 39th Vice President of the United States from 1969 until his resignation in 1973. His resignation was a result of a scandal involving allegations of tax evasion and corruption during his tenure as Governor of Maryland. Agnew faced investigations into bribery and extortion, leading to a plea deal where he pleaded no contest to a single felony charge of tax evasion. He resigned in October 1973 to avoid further legal repercussions and to restore public trust in the Vice Presidency. Following his resignation, Agnew spent the remainder of his life largely out of the public eye, rarely making public appearances and often blaming others for his downfall.
...}
{...
President Richard Nixon resigned from office on August 9, 1974
...}
So offhand they seem to not be related?

 

[Rigby5]

Oooops ....

16K views · 1.9K reactions | The Trump administration wants to cut off federal student loans for college programs whose graduates don’t earn enough money after graduation. Conservatives thought this would target “woke” liberal arts majors… but it wi

The Trump administration wants to cut off federal student loans for college programs whose graduates don’t earn enough money after graduation. Conservatives thought this would target “woke” liberal...

www.facebook.com

Personally I would like to see free college tuition.
I think it would boost the economy by making our workforce more competitive.
But the effect on Christian colleges I had not even thought of.

 

[sear]

"Agnew" S2 #3,239

- gesundheit -

"Spiro Agnew served from 1969 until his resignation in 1973" R5 #3,241

BOTH Dick & Spiro in office during Woodstock !

 

[Shiftless2]

 

[sear]

"FDA withdraws publication of COVID and shingles vaccine research findings" #3,244

S2,
Have they shown their hand here?
It's one thing to curtail funding on basis that it's wasted, because everybody knows vaccine never worked.

But "research findings" means the expenditure is already made.
If the findings corroborated legitimacy of their position, what harm in informing the public? Subjecting the findings to further corroboration / peer review?

Suppression of findings for research already conducted? Is there any explanation more plausible than "cover-up"?
What else could they be hiding, other than the efficacy of vax?
On whose agenda?
They're doing RFKj's bidding. I get that.
Whose bidding is RFKj doing?