Science is not about proving the Protestants are better than the Catholics, or
the way to Jehovah is through Christ, or ...
It's about legitimacy. When there's error in science, as there may have been in Sir Isaac Newton's 3 Laws of Motion,
science develops clarifications, which is how we've:
- preserved Newton's 3 laws, while adding
- quantum physics, equally legitimate science, but without adherence to Newton's laws, &
- relativity, which adheres to neither the laws of quantum physics, nor the laws of Newton.
Superb!
Then the methodological deficiencies can be:
a) peer reviewed, a rock-bottom fundamental practice within science as a whole, as a discipline
b) deficiencies specifically enumerated, exposed
That's what they did with Pons & Fleischmann.
But instead of exposing the ostensible inaccuracy & imbalance, they suppress it?
That's not pure science. That's dirty politics.
But this controversy over mRNA has nothing to do with science or religion.
Instead it is entirely about the $80 billion both Moderna and Pfizer made and are making off mRNA.
The mRNA science was developed by Dr. Robert Malone.
We know what it does.
It reprograms the DNA of organelles in the human cells, to grow proteins.
What Moderna and Pfizer claim is that since it is the proteins of pathogens that the immune system detects, remembers, and responds to, that then you can simulate a vaccine by just using mRNA to make out own cells simulate a pathogen.
But that obviously is impossible.
The point of covid having spike proteins is because we have ACE2 doorways in all our cells, that open if a spike protein is inserted, like a key in a lock.
Those ACE2 doorways exist because our exosomes need to often use them to enter and exist our cells.
Those exosomes are how our cells broadcast alerts and receive instructions for things like to heal a nearby wound.
So spike proteins can not then possibly used as an epitope identifying an invading pathogen.
The spike proteins of covid are identical to the spike protein of an exosome.
So whatever the immune system uses as an epitope to identify an invading pathogen, it is not and can not be the spike protein.
That is easily proven by the fact there is absolutely nothing positive done by the mRNA injection after 2 months.
Not only have fully vaccinated people gotten infected by covid as many as 5 times, but 2 months after the mRNA injection, it no longer does anything at all to severity or symptoms.
So why does this report not say that?
The obvious reason is money$.
The $80 billion is the single most lucrative business the world has ever seen.
There is no huge investment in machines or raw materials.
It is basically something for nothing.
{...
Science, Public Health Policy and the Law
The Autopsy Data Are In: What They Reveal About COVID-19 Vaccines and Public Health Oversight
James Lyons-Weiler
Editorial
Two newly published peer-reviewed studies in
Science, Public Health Policy & the Law provide critical forensic evidence that strengthens the link between COVID-19 vaccination and a range of fatal adverse events. The systematic review led by Hulscher et al. and the VAERS-based autopsy analysis by Rose together represent an important step forward in our effort to understand COVID-19 vaccine safety through post-mortem investigation. These studies highlight both the urgent need for greater transparency in pre-release and pre-approval vaccine safety science and the systemic failures that have hindered the collection of autopsy data in the COVID-19 era.
A Pattern in Post-Vaccination Deaths
The Hulscher et al. systematic review examined 325 autopsy cases from 44 published studies, finding that 73.9% of deaths were adjudicated by independent physicians as being directly caused by or significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccination. The leading causes of death included:
– Sudden cardiac death (35%)
– Pulmonary embolism (12.5%)
– Myocardial infarction (12%)
– Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT, 7.9%)
– Myocarditis (7.1%)
– Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%)
– Cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%)
Most deaths occurred within one to two weeks of vaccination, with the highest concentration in the first week. The temporal relationship between vaccination and fatal outcomes suggests an urgent need for deeper forensic investigation.
However, while the autopsies in Hulscher et al.’s study provide invaluable insight, they are only part of the picture. Rose’s (2025) new analysis of VAERS autopsy data exposes an even larger issue: the dramatic decline in autopsy rates despite rising post-vaccine deaths.
The Vanishing Autopsies: What Rose’s Study Reveals
If an increase in unexpected deaths follows the administration of a medical intervention, the logical response is to increase forensic investigations. Yet, Rose’s analysis of VAERS autopsy data from 2021 to 2023 demonstrates the opposite:
– The absolute number of autopsy reports in VAERS increased by 1,714% compared to influenza vaccines.
– Paradoxically, the rate of autopsies per reported death declined by 77.6%.
This paradox suggests that while more post-vaccine deaths were reported, fewer autopsies were conducted to determine causality. The study further demonstrates that the majority of COVID-19 vaccine-associated autopsies linked the cause of death to cardiovascular events, including:
– Myocarditis (11%)
– Cardiac arrest (12%)
– Pulmonary embolism (16%)
Strikingly, when compared to influenza vaccines, VAERS data contained no cases of cardiac arrest or pulmonary embolism as a cause of death following influenza vaccination. This discrepancy further supports concerns over unique cardiovascular risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines.
Why the Decrease in Autopsy Rates?
Rose’s findings raise a pressing question: Why were fewer autopsies performed when they were needed most? The study points to several contributing factors:
1.
Systematic discouragement of autopsies—During the COVID-19 pandemic, medical institutions actively discouraged autopsies, citing concerns about viral transmission. This reluctance appears to have extended into the vaccine era, despite the clear need for forensic clarity.
2.
Gaps in VAERS reporting—While autopsies should be systematically recorded in VAERS for cases of post-vaccine mortality, many reports list only “death” with no additional details, limiting their forensic utility.
3.
Institutional reluctance to probe vaccine-related fatalities—Given the scale and urgency of the vaccine rollout, regulatory agencies may have been hesitant to conduct widespread forensic investigations that could raise public concerns.
This failure to perform and record autopsies represents a significant void in our understanding of vaccine safety. Had systematic forensic investigations been conducted from the outset, we might have better characterized these risks and taken steps to prevent unnecessary deaths.
...}
Two newly published peer-reviewed studies in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law provide critical forensic evidence that strengthens the link between
publichealthpolicyjournal.com
Here is another link showing dozens of sepsis and resulting amputations due to the mRNA vaccination damage.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-mrna-vaccine-injury-stories-sepsis-amputation/5846724?print=1
