Using this logic every country in the world would be justified in attacking the US - after all, they have a serious arsenal of weapons
One of the biggest lies floating around right now is this idea that Iran posed no threat. And suddenly everyone’s a foreign affairs expert.
That’s simply not true.
You can have strong feelings about this conflict. But pretending Iran was harmless before this is detached from reality.
Iran has one of the largest ballistic missile arsenals in the Middle East. Not theory. Not speculation. Fact.
It has thousands of drones. It's demonstrated the ability to launch coordinated missile and drone strikes across the region. It's targeted U.S. assets and regional bases in previous escalations.
That’s documented.
In this round of fighting, missiles and drones were fired across the Gulf. Airspace shut down. Bases went on high alert. Interceptors were launched. Civilian areas were put at risk.
That’s not “no threat.”
Was Iran about to invade North America? Of course not. That’s not the standard.
The standard is whether it had the capability and willingness to strike allied assets, destabilize the region, and endanger Western personnel.
It did.
Enriched uranium. A highly developed ballistic missile program. Expanding drone capacity. Active proxy networks across multiple countries.
That isn’t harmless. It never was.
And here’s another reality people don’t want to acknowledge. Canada is a NATO ally. The United States is our closest defence partner. Israel is an ally.
Prime Minister Mark Carney has already made it clear that Canada is not militarily involved.
But alliances matter. Security partnerships matter. Strategic alignment matters.
Recognizing that Iran posed a real regional threat is not cheerleading war. It’s acknowledging facts.
We don’t need to exaggerate the threat.
But we don’t get to pretend it didn’t exist either.
SOURCE
The reason I disagree is that the more nukes out there, the safer everyone actually is.
That is because of MAD.
Nukes can only be used if the other person does not have the nuclear deterrent.
So then the world would be safer with a nuclear Iran than without it.
And that is proven by these illegal current attacks on Iran, that is murdering hundreds, if not thousands, of innocents.
The reality of Iran not being a threat is obvious from the fact it only makes defensive weapons.
Sure it has a huge missile arsenal, but very short range.
It can not hit the US with anything.
The actually "bad guys" are NATO.
NATO is actually the Allies from WWI, who actually are the historic colonial imperialists, with the worst history of abusing the whole rest of the world.
Originally the bad guy colonial imperialists were England, France, and Spain.
But the US replaced Spain after the Spanish American war.
And let us not forget the Allies were the bad guys in WWI.
If you look at the weapons of NATO, they are not defensive.
They are long range missiles, aircraft carriers, submarines, long range bombers, amphibious assault craft, etc.
Realistically Iran was never the problem, but NATO has always been the real problem.
And this attack on Iran is obvious proof.
There were no charges, no trials, no attempt to hear both sides in the court of public opinion even.
It was the act of extreme dictatorship, without regard for law, ethics, justice, or human rights.
It is proof once again, that we are the bad guy.