The Second Term of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States of America

[sear]

"The reason I disagree is that the more nukes out there, the safer everyone actually is.
That is because of MAD." R5 #2,828

This assertion is reminiscent of the adventurer / experimenter that leaps from the Empire State Building's observation deck to "see what happens"
and as he plummets toward the pavement is overheard through a 7th story window saying to himself, "No problem so far!"

Superficially paradoxical perhaps, but "MAD", mutually assured destruction does not work UNLESS !!

Unless each nuclear armed nation's arsenal is under the control of leadership that wishes to survive (antithetical to the namesake "MAD").

But doomsday cults are quite familiar to Western civilization *.

Some experts scale human history in millions of years.
Difficult to imagine humanity surviving a few more centuries, if MAD, a dynamic which does not succeed without leadership determination to survive,
if MAD is allowed to continue without Plan-B safeguard.

So far, zippo.

* ref:
Nostradamus, Jim Jones, pick your favorites:

https://www.cnbc.com/2011/04/06/Notorious-Doomsday-Prophets-and-Cults.html

 

[sear]

"... Trump claims there was election fraud in 2020 without any evidence, but " R5 #2,840

United States Constitution:
ARTICLE #22: Ratified February 27, 1951
SECTION 1. No person shall be elected to the office of President more than twice, and ...

Donald J. Trump has a reputation for lying.
In the case of many of Trump's assertions the truth of what Trump may claim may matter.

In this case, no.
Whether Trump won the 2020 election is immaterial. IF Trump ASSERTS that he won the 2020 election, after claiming he also won in 2016,
then even if Trump won again in 2024 that ostensible election victory would for reason of Constitutional enumeration be null and void.

 

[Shiftless2]

Operation Epic Fury: where we killed our own handpicked successors for Iran AND had an ally shoot down three of our own fighter jets.

This isn't a war plan. This is what happens when you let Donald J. Trump, who bankrupted casinos, run a military operation from a country club.

They named this thing 'Epic Fury' and the only thing it's furiously doing is generating friendly fire incidents and killing the people we needed alive.

At what point does 'so successful it knocked out most of the candidates' stop being a flex and start being an admission of catastrophic incompetence?

What's your favorite part of this masterclass in strategic planning?



SOURCE with comments

 

[Rigby5]

This assertion is reminiscent of the adventurer / experimenter that leaps from the Empire State Building's observation deck to "see what happens"
and as he plummets toward the pavement is overheard through a 7th story window saying to himself, "No problem so far!"

Superficially paradoxical perhaps, but "MAD", mutually assured destruction does not work UNLESS !!

Unless each nuclear armed nation's arsenal is under the control of leadership that wishes to survive (antithetical to the namesake "MAD").

But doomsday cults are quite familiar to Western civilization *.

Some experts scale human history in millions of years.
Difficult to imagine humanity surviving a few more centuries, if MAD, a dynamic which does not succeed without leadership determination to survive,
if MAD is allowed to continue without Plan-B safeguard.

So far, zippo.

* ref:
Nostradamus, Jim Jones, pick your favorites:

https://www.cnbc.com/2011/04/06/Notorious-Doomsday-Prophets-and-Cults.html

But the reality is that MAD retaliatory effect has been vastly more successful than the alternative of an arbitrary government dictatorship over nuclear weapons.
The facts are the US had no legal or moral justification for the nuclear experiments on civilians of Nagasaki or Hiroshima.
Since not having a MAD nuclear retaliation then totally failed, that then leaves MAD as the only possibility left to the world.

As for doomsday cults, that is not common or normal, since it requires people supporting suicidal leaders.
That did happen with Jonestown, but that was because of Jim Jones already dying from some medical problem.

{...
Audio tapes of 1978 meetings exhibit Jones complaining of high blood pressure, small strokes, weight loss of thirty to forty pounds within the span of two weeks, temporary blindness, convulsions and, in his final month, grotesque swelling of the extremities.
During meetings and public addresses, Jones' once-sharp speaking voice often sounded slurred; words ran together or were tripped over. He would occasionally not finish sentences even when reading typed reports over the commune's speaker system.
...}

Jonestown - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[sear]

Operation Epic Fury #2,843

"But the reality is that MAD retaliatory effect has been vastly more successful than the alternative of an arbitrary government dictatorship over nuclear weapons." R5 #2,844

Splendid.
What you are (deliberately?) overlooking is the "low probability / high consequence" calculation.
You cite it as a success, so far.

Who disputes that?
The point is, there's a subset of the population that is homicidal, and a subset of the population which is genocidal.

It's merely a matter of time before one of them acquires the ability to terminate the human race.
It needn't be a POTUS.

Tossing a stone into a crowd to spark a brawl is a long-tenured scenario.
It's not impossible to imagine a variety of malefactors staging a provocation which appears to be the beginning of nuclear war.
The nuclear dominoes predictably fall from there. Prosperous nations being converted into smoldering craters based on a false flag doomsday ruse.

We're less likely to succumb to self-extinction if we eliminate the means to it.

 

[Rigby5]

Splendid.
What you are (deliberately?) overlooking is the "low probability / high consequence" calculation.
You cite it as a success, so far.

Who disputes that?
The point is, there's a subset of the population that is homicidal, and a subset of the population which is genocidal.

It's merely a matter of time before one of them acquires the ability to terminate the human race.
It needn't be a POTUS.

Tossing a stone into a crowd to spark a brawl is a long-tenured scenario.
It's not impossible to imagine a variety of malefactors staging a provocation which appears to be the beginning of nuclear war.
The nuclear dominoes predictably fall from there. Prosperous nations being converted into smoldering craters based on a false flag doomsday ruse.

We're less likely to succumb to self-extinction if we eliminate the means to it.

You miss the point.
Regardless of nuclear weapons being a risk, the facts are that without MAD has absolutely proven to be the worst possible failure.
It is totally guaranteed that without MAD, then nuclear weapons will definitely be used, as they already have been.
MAD is the only possible solution left, regardless of how risky that may be.

There is no question in my mind that if not for MAD, we would have nuked Russia, China, Vietnam, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.
The fact we now can assassinate with only hundreds of collateral damage deaths, shows we still are not governed by the Rule of Law.

 

[sear]

"You miss the point." R5 #2,846

No.
I understand your point. It's wrong.

"Regardless of nuclear weapons being a risk, the facts are that without MAD has absolutely proven to be the worst possible failure." R5 #2,846

"Without MAD" means before MAD, and before MAD means before the capability.

You declare it:

" absolutely proven to be the worst possible failure." R5 #2,846

We have only one history.
So while it may be true that it was "proven to be the worst possible failure" it was simultaneously an unprecedented spectacular cosmic success. No civilization anywhere else in the cosmos has equaled it, so far as we know.

"MAD is the only possible solution left, regardless of how risky that may be." R5 #2,846

- piffle -
That's a defeatist's mantra.

Smallpox bedeviled mankind for millennia.
We could have embraced your fatalist mantra and euphemistically "lived with it", which is to say, DIED from it.

Instead we eradicated it.

"You miss the point." R5 #2,846

I understand your point.
I vehemently reject it because it's conspicuously wrong.

 

[Rigby5]

No.
I understand your point. It's wrong.


"Without MAD" means before MAD, and before MAD means before the capability.

You declare it:

We have only one history.
So while it may be true that it was "proven to be the worst possible failure" it was simultaneously an unprecedented spectacular cosmic success. No civilization anywhere else in the cosmos has equaled it, so far as we know.


- piffle -
That's a defeatist's mantra.

Smallpox bedeviled mankind for millennia.
We could have embraced your fatalist mantra and euphemistically "lived with it", which is to say, DIED from it.

Instead we eradicated it.

I understand your point.
I vehemently reject it because it's conspicuously wrong.

I am not sure I understand your point?
Instead of MAD, are you suggesting we get rid of all nuclear weapons instead?
While that has some appeal, I do not see how we could be sure to trust that anyone else actually did that?