News Related To The Ukraine / Russian War

sear

Administrator
Staff member

Polish government bans grain and food imports from Ukraine​

Sat, April 15, 2023 at 8:36 AM EDT
WARSAW (Reuters) - The Polish government has decided to ban imports of grain and other food from Ukraine to protect the Polish agricultural sector, the leader of the ruling Law and Justice Party (PiS), Jaroslaw Kaczyński, said on Saturday.
Large quantities of Ukrainian grains, which are cheaper than those produced in the European Union, have ended up staying in Central European states amid logistical bottlenecks, hitting prices and sales for local farmers.
This has created a political problem for the PiS in an election year.
"Today, the government has decided on a regulation that prohibits the entry, importation of grain into Poland, but also dozens of other types of food (from Ukraine)," Kaczyński said during the PiS party convention.


I totally understand domestic political concerns within Poland. But is excluding lower cost food from Polish markets really in the best interests of the Polish consumer?
 
European Commission on banning import of Ukrainian grain: Unilateral actions of EU member states are unacceptable
European Pravda — Sunday, 16 April 2023, 16:16
After Hungary and Poland banned the import of agricultural products from Ukraine, the European Commission said that trade policy belongs to the exclusive competence of the EU and unilateral actions of states are unacceptable.
Source: This was stated by European Commission spokesman Arianna Podesta in a comment to Polish news agency PAP, reports European Pravda.
Podesta stressed that the European Commission is aware of the ban on the import of grain and other agricultural products from Ukraine announced by Poland and Hungary.
Quote: "We ask the relevant authorities of both countries to provide additional information to be able to evaluate these measures," Podesta said.
She added that "in this context, it should be emphasised that trade policy belongs to the exclusive competence of the EU, and therefore unilateral actions are unacceptable."
"In such difficult times, it is extremely important to coordinate and approve all decisions in the EU," the representative of the European Commission added.

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/04/16/7398103/
 
I have not corroborated the following. My reason for elevated skepticism, "pravda.com". None the less, it casts the China / Russia relationship in a more Western-friendly light.

Source: AFP, citing Mao Ning, China’s Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman
Quote: "China respects the sovereign state status of the participating republics after the dissolution of the Soviet Union," she said.
The spokeswoman stated that "China respects the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all countries and upholds the purposes and principles of the UN Charter."

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/04/24/7399165/
 

European Pravda

Aligning Ukraine and EU since 2014
US State Department Reveals Possible Options of Sending F-16 Jets to Ukraine
Tuesday, 20 June 2023

Any potential transfer of F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine, whether from the United States or from an allied operator, would take months.
According to Stan Brown, the department's principal deputy assistant secretary for the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, while the US has not itself announced any transfers of F-16 fighter aircraft to Ukraine to date, it supports other allies' intent to deliver those aircraft to Kyiv, reports Military Times.
Brown underlined that the transfer of such aircraft to Ukraine has to be a "holistic" approach, to include training both pilots and maintainers.
One of the first steps in a potential transfer of F-16 aircraft will be the license to train those airmen, before the license to transfer the aircraft even occurs.
Then, the aircraft themselves need to be identified – whether they'll be delivered via a third-party transfer or another mechanism – before developing a plan for the Ukrainian military to use the aircraft.
Brown mentioned that the State Department is already working to complete the paperwork for third-party transfer requests coming from nations like the Netherlands so that pilot training can begin.
He did not specify the timeline for when these documents will be ready but mentioned that "it is now progressing much faster."
Previously, Denmark and the Netherlands lead the "fighter jet coalition" discussing the training of Ukrainian pilots on Western combat aircraft and the potential supply of fighter jets.
The Danish government is ready to transfer F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine with the approval of the US aircraft manufactures.
Rutte stated that the Netherlands has not yet made a decision on sending of F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine but is "seriously considering" such an option.


As the West perdiddles, innocent Ukrainian military & civilian continue to die from the senseless Russian onslaught.
 
OEftBG1.jpeg
 

Seems like there's some tensions within Russian forces.​

Prigozhin Turns Forces Back in Deal With Kremlin to Drop Charges​


  • Showdown averted after mercenary leader led troops on Moscow
  • Uprising is biggest challenge to Putin’s rule in decades

Prigozhin Says Wagner Military Column Is Turning Away From Moscow
By Bloomberg News
June 24, 2023 at 12:41 PM GMT-5Updated onJune 24, 2023 at 4:28 PM GMT-5

Wagner mercenary leader Yevgeny Prigozhin halted his advance toward Moscow and pulled his fighters back, defusing what had become the biggest threat to Vladimir Putin’s grip on Russia in his almost quarter-century rule.​

As part of a deal to end the uprising the Russian president had personally guaranteed that Prigozhin would be allowed to leave for neighboring Belarus and authorities would drop criminal mutiny charges against him and his fighters, according to the Kremlin.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...es-back-from-moscow-avoids-showdown#xj4y7vzkg

The reports of this seem to raise more questions than answers.
Not sure what Priozhin had in mind, making a move on Moscow, and then terminating. Seems like a textbook bad move.
 
S2 #7
Alright.
Niccolò Machiavelli will never be purged from international politics. The U.S. has been involved in such matters since the CIA approved overthrow of Iran's Mossadegh, right up through Reagan's Iran / Contra, etc.
"Plausible Deniability" is the rhetorical fig leaf. I can't prove MTG wrong, even if her wild guess just happens to be true, albeit by pure coincidence.

The good People of Russia (and perhaps several of the bad ones) have legitimate issue with Putin marching Russia's young into the Ukrainian meat-grinder. "More than 100,000 fighters from the Kremlin’s forces have been killed or wounded since December ... around 20,000 Russians who have been killed in about six months".

If MTG had through meticulous integrity earned an undisputed reputation as a Statesman, such claim about U.S. complicity against Putin might be taken more seriously.

Who takes MTG seriously?
Seriously?

But don't let MTG fog obscure reality.

Why did Prigozhin halt his advance on Putin's Kremlin?
There are many possible explanations.

One possibility:
Troops in Prigozhin's Wagner group included Russians released from prison in exchange for military service under Prigozhin's command.
Prigozhin may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he should know loyalty has limits, and even Russian ex-cons may feel some loyalty to the motherland.

But if that's Prigozhin's reason for stopping well short of Moscow, why did Prigozhin command the apparent revolt in the first place?

ref:
 
It's a cliche' that the first casualty of war is truth.
Even if the underlying message is true, the message may be muddled by superlatives and embellishments.

Ukrayinska Pravda

The miser pays thrice. Western companies clinging to Russia are losing markets, business and reputation​

Bohdan Miroshnychenko / Mon, June 26, 2023 at 2:46 AM EDT

That's the headline.
Certainly Russia's attempted military conquest of Ukraine is military. And Ukraine's efforts to defend include military. But that's not all.

Economic sanctions against Russia by Western governments, and private sector are restricting Putin's list of options.
Early in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, most Western companies sought ways to sit out the war without leaving Russia. They referred to their alleged responsibility for their Russian employees, contracts, food security, etc.
The Kremlin also claimed to leave business separate from politics, but this turned out to be a lie. Russia is now spending an increasing proportion of its taxes on the army and a decreasing one on humanitarian needs.
The shift in attitudes towards Western firms operating in Russia is gradually becoming a trend. Meanwhile, ethical companies that left Russia in the first months of the invasion may be rewarded for their choice when Russian assets are seized and during Ukraine’s recovery.

https://news.yahoo.com/miser-pays-thrice-western-companies-064635796.html
It's understandable that Ukraine would like to expel Russia from Ukraine, & perhaps also Crimea.
But has much thought been given to Russia's status after this Ukraine War? If Russia is restored to Cold War style isolation, is it reasonable for the West to expect no further trouble from Russia, if Russia is denied the benefits of Western prosperity?

Certainly this crisis must be brought to a Western-friendly end. But what thought is being given to prevent a future crisis from Russia?
 
15 Tips to Negotiate a Great Salary
1. Threaten a coup by driving 1,500km to your boss' office with 1000s of troops and vehicles
wikiHow / S2 #10
Plenty of unanswered questions on the NATO side, and perhaps a few in Russia.

Some reports indicate Prigozhin's contention with Putin was Russia was not aggressive enough in it's War against Ukraine.

In any case the "agreement" reportedly facilitated from Belarus leaves Prigozhin free for now.

The Coup Is Over, but Putin Is in Trouble​

The Wagner Group’s chief may have lost spectacularly, but Russia’s dictator suffered a huge political blow.
By Tom Nichols
A short recap of the past 24 hours in Russia reads like the backstory for a fanciful episode of Madam Secretary or The West Wing. Yevgeny Prigozhin, the brutal convicted criminal who leads the Wagner mercenary group, declared war on the Russian Ministry of Defense and marched into the city of Rostov-on-Don. He then headed north for Moscow, carrying his demand for the ousting of Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu and Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov. The city went on alert.

Prigozhin and his men came within 125 miles of the capital—that is, closer to Moscow than Philadelphia is to Washington, D.C. He then said that a deal had been struck and that Wagner’s forces were turning around to avoid bloodshed. Apparently, however, the blood Prigozhin saved from being shed was his own. If the “deal” announced by the Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov accurately reflects an actual settlement, Prigozhin has in the space of a day gone from being a powerful warlord to a man living on borrowed time in a foreign country, waiting for Russian President Vladimir Putin’s inevitable retribution.

According to Peskov, Russia is dropping all charges against Prigozhin, who must now go into exile in Belarus. Wagner fighters who did not take part in the rebellion will be given amnesty, and then they will sign contracts that will bring them under the control of Shoigu’s Ministry of Defense. I suggested yesterday that Shoigu’s attempt to seize Wagner’s men and dissolve the force might be one of the reasons Prigozhin went on the march. This outcome is a defeat of the first order for Prigozhin, who has now lost everything except his life.


Any guess how much longer Prigozhin will remain alive?
And if $money was involved:
- how much?
- from whom?
- to whom?
- for what?
 
Popular Mechanics

The Wagner Mutiny Hit Russia's Air Force Hard. Really Hard.​

Sébastien Roblin
Updated Tue, June 27, 2023 at 2:29 PM EDT
Last Friday, Yevgeny Prigozhin, a businessman-turned-warlord controlling Russia’s globe-spanning Wagner private military company and its tens of thousands of mercenaries, launched an armed mutiny aimed not so much at overthrowing President Vladimir Putin but, rather, the leadership of Russia’s defense ministry.
While Prigozhin claimed that Russia’s military had intentionally shelled his mercenaries, the underlying conflict was due to plans by Russia’s ministry of defense to convert much of his manpower into regular army service, as well as Prigozhin’s increasingly open personal attacks against unpopular Russian defense minister, Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu.
Prigozhin himself joined a mechanized force—including T-80BV and T-90s tanks—which surrounded and seized control of the Russian military headquarters in Rostov, a city of one million that serves as the logistical base for Russian forces invading southeastern Ukraine.

Separately, a column of Wagner troops counting over one hundred trucks went barreling down the M4 highway towards Moscow.
Twenty-four hours later—after Putin promised to “brutally” deal with a henchman he now described as a back-stabbing traitor in a public address—the relationship was patched over in a deal supposedly proposed by Belarussian dictator Alexander Lukaschenko. Charges of armed rebellion against Prigozhin were dropped, he would move to Belarus, and some of his troops would still be absorbed by Russia’s military while others may be transferred to Wagner’s extensive overseas deployments, particularly in Africa.

Never mind the seven Russian military aircraft reportedly shot down and 13 Russian air force (VKS) pilots killed by Wagner anti-aircraft fire, as reported by pro-Russian military sources. The full claimed count includes:
  • 2 attack helicopters (Ka-52 and Mi-35)
  • 1 armed transport helicopter (Mi-8)
  • 3 electronic warfare helicopters (Mi-8MTPR-1)
  • 1 Il-22M airborne command post/comms relay plane
 
Long View:

Putin seems to have believed, and openly claimed Putin's / Russia's military adventure in Ukraine would be fast & easy. Putin might have had some basis for this belief, his rapid conquest of Crimea for example.
Ukraine didn't work out that way. A year & a half later, Russia is bogged down.

The punchline for this: Russia's military was presented as the 2nd strongest military in the world. Turns out it's the 2nd strongest military in Ukraine.
"In the critical hours of Prigozhin’s insurrection, Putin’s Russia turned out to be what its critics had long claimed: a mafia state lacking robust institutions – but, unfortunately, one with the world’s largest nuclear arsenal."

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/columns/2023/07/4/7409775/
Putin won't live forever, and he may not even be able to cling to power much longer.

So what's to become of Russia after its War in Ukraine is over?

"The Berlin Wall" fell during the GHWB (the elder President Bush) administration. GHWB was not only president. He'd also been a master spy, head of the CIA.

The world has suffered a gargantuan blow as a result of the following GHWB administration failure. The U.S. president did not send Gorbachev a formal head of State to head of State letter:

Dear President Gorbachev:
For decades the U.S. and U.S.S.R. were locked in a mutually depleting Cold War that threatened our mutual annihilation.
That War is now over, and some might expect the victor to harvest the spoils.
But the United States of America maintains a proud tradition of welcoming our former adversaries as friends, as we have with both Germany and Japan after WWII.
Not a mere rhetorical welcome without substance or concern, but genuine, substantial peace and prosperity.

The Soviet economy was a zero sum game. For government to have more, the good people of the Soviet Union had less, and for the Kremlin to keep pace with the Pentagon, the good people of the Soviet Union were forced to have a great deal less.
As president of the United States I offer to you, to Russia and the good people that populate her, the same determined hand of friendship that it is our tradition to extend.

It will be a very long road Mr. Gorbachev, measured not in miles, but decades. Many challenges and obstacles await us in our mutual effort to welcome Russia to a far more prosperous, more comfortable, more secure future.
"A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." There is no benefit to delay. The sooner we begin to rebuild, to modernize, to benefit all of Russia the better.

I have appointed a liaison team to establish communications with their counterpart working group in Russia.
This combined team can begin by establishing the objectives Russia chooses to achieve, prioritized to your preference, to be executed only upon your approval.
If any time you sense a snag in their progress, or if you simply wish to touch base to solidify mutually beneficial diplomatic relations, please feel free to contact me directly.

Both our nations have paid a price. But the wisdom of your world-class leadership is surely equal to this task that lays before us. Our liaison team has communication keys to share with yours, for their consultation with Germany, Japan, and other Western nations eager to offer constructive suggestions on how to optimize Russia's post War transition.

All best to you and and Raisa.

Your partner in Russia's prosperity, with kindest regards

United States President George Herbert Walker Bush

202-456-1111

Apparently such letter was never sent.
The Cold War ended.
The former Soviet Union was allowed by the West to languish.
All that has lead to where we are today.

So what ?

Russia reportedly has the largest nuclear weapons arsenal on Earth.
Were it not so the prosperous West might simply prepare the gradual process of preparing Russia's economy and People to enter the E.U., to join in the global prosperity. BUT !!

Russian nukes are a problem.
What's the solution?

After the dust has settled in Russia's Ukraine War, is there a rational reason the West including the E.U. should not make an offer reflecting the spirit of the letter example above, with one substantial condition ?
That the West extend to Russia a transition to Western prosperity akin to that provided to former East Germany after reunification, ON THE CONDITION that Russia and her satellites including Belarus surrender their WMD including 100% of their nuclear arsenal.

Is there a rational reason this offer should not be extended?
 
July 7, 2023
The United States announced on Friday that it would supply Ukraine with widely banned cluster munitions for its counteroffensive against occupying Russian forces, and NATO's leader said the military alliance would unite at a summit next week on how to bring Ukraine closer to joining.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-se...ions-nato-makes-membership-pledge-2023-07-07/
Objection from allies based on risk of remaining munitions exploding, harming Ukrainians after the war. Nearly all casualties from these delayed explosions are civilians, most of them children. Is that worse than Ukrainians becoming Russians at gunpoint? Risky? Yes. Who better to weigh those risks than Ukraine?
 
Thanks R #14
I don't dismiss the severe warnings critics have provided for this weapons transfer. BUT !!
I agree that it's a decision that should be made by Ukraine.

Many lay critics may think Ukraine should be offered / provided other weapons. Turns out, there aren't m/any alternatives.
 

Some in West like seeing how Kremlin is being destroyed slowly, but price is too high for Ukraine / Friday, 07 July 2023


https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/eng/interview/2023/07/7/7165273/

The headline is more interesting than the article.
I've puzzled over why Ukraine hasn't inflicted a penalty on Russia by counter-attacking Russia, setting the Kremlin aflame for example.

Turns out what exceedingly few reports there are of it indicate many of the weapons Ukraine has been provided from the West were supplied on condition that they would NOT be used to counter-attack in Russia.
That seems for example to be a condition of Ukraine receiving the F-16 fighter jets it's been pleading for.

Bottom line, NATO to major extent is standing by while Ukrainian troops are smooshed in the meat-grinder of war with Russia.
NATO's reason? It continues to degrade Russia's military.

It seems unintended consequences may ensue for NATO.

For example:
Russia is likely to re-arm.
And when it does Russia will simultaneously upgrade to more modern, more lethal weapons.
Thus NATO may believe spilling Ukraine blood by the gallon serves NATO interests.
But the short-term gain is irrelevant. Russia is exceedingly unlikely to deliberately diffuse its weakened military further by expanding its War from Ukraine to NATO.
There may be an error here or there, an errant Russian missile crossing a border for example. But Russia deliberately attacking NATO before Russia is defeated in Ukraine? Unlikely.

More likely, something going wrong at a Ukrainian nuclear power plant.
Not sure what the Pentagon, or NATO has planned in response to that. Let's hope we don't find out.
 
Zelenskyy criticised partners who discuss NATO without Ukraine: unprecedented and absurd
Alona Mazurenko — Tuesday, 11 July 2023

Quote: "Ukraine will be represented in Vilnius at the NATO summit. Out of respect. But Ukraine also deserves consideration.
Now, on the way to Vilnius, we have received signals that the wording without Ukraine is being discussed. And I want to emphasise that this wording is only about the invitation and not Ukraine's membership.
Unprecedented and absurd – when there is no time frame for the invitation and the membership of Ukraine, and when some strange wording is added about the 'conditions' even for the invitation of Ukraine…
There seems to be no readiness to invite Ukraine to join NATO or make it a member of the Alliance.
This means that Ukraine's membership in NATO remains a possible bargain chip – in negotiations with Russia. And for Russia, this implies a motivation to continue its terror in the future."

Details: Zelenskyy stated that Ukraine values its allies and common security: "and we always appreciate an open conversation".
He added that "uncertainty is a weakness", and promised to discuss this at the summit openly.
As of the morning of 11 July, NATO Allies still do not have an agreed decision on what the wording of the summit communiqué will be on Ukraine and its Euro-Atlantic aspirations.


Russia's Kremlin has argued that NATO expansion is the reason Russia needs an aggressive military posture.
That's a lie.
NATO is a defensive treaty: an attack against any NATO member is by NATO agreement considered by NATO as an attack against all NATO member nations.

While some critics might argue this is merely NATO member nations spoiling for a fight, the more sober explanation is that expansive size and capability of NATO as a singular military entity is intended not to cause or invite war, but to discourage, prevent war.

It's understandable that Ukraine's President Zelenskyy may be a little off-kilter due to the rigors imposed on a wartime president.
But a textbook standard of advocacy, persuasion is to present an argument that explains why it's in a party's best interest to follow the advocated course of action.

For that, President Zelenskyy should explain to NATO members that including Ukraine in NATO will help buffer NATO from further Russian aggression.

Zelenskyy may not have been persuasive enough on that point.
It may be clearer once the Russia / Ukraine War is over.
 
July 11, 2023 8:57 am ET

President Biden and other NATO leaders arrived for a two-day summit in Lithuania that will see a historic expansion of the alliance in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
VILNIUS, Lithuania—President Biden remained at odds with other NATO leaders over Ukraine’s membership, as the military alliance’s annual summit kicked off just hours after gaining a boost from Sweden’s prospective accession.

Turkey Agrees to Allow Sweden to Join NATO
The pact came after hours of negotiations ahead of the military alliance’s summit in Lithuania.

Commentary | opinionOpinion: This Isn’t Your Father’s NATOhttps://api.cxense.com/public/widge...cx_testId=3&cx_testVariant=cx_165&cx_artPos=1
An anti-Putin military alliance now stretches from the Barents to the Black Sea.

 
Ukraine's Defence Intelligence confirms assassination of Russian commander involved in attacks on Ukraine: No witnesses to murder
Alona Mazurenko — Tuesday, 11 July 2023

Defence Intelligence of Ukraine (DIU) has confirmed that Stanislav Rzhitskiy, the former commander of the Krasnodar submarine of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, involved in missile attacks on Ukraine, has been shot dead in the Russian city of Krasnodar.
Source: Press service of the DIU
Quote: "On 10 July, the submariner was jogging in Krasnodar's 30th Anniversary of Victory Park. He was shot seven times with a Makarov pistol around 06:00. Rzhitskiy died on the spot due to his gunshot wounds.
The park was deserted due to heavy rain, so no witnesses could provide details or identify the gunman."
Details: The Krasnodar is one of six Varshavyanka-class submarines that are part of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy. Each of them has the capacity to carry up to four Kalibr cruise missiles.
Captain 2nd Rank Rzhitskiy had been living in Sevastopol since at least 2006.
For some time, he was the commander of the submarine Alrosa. After Alrosa was sent for modernisation, he was appointed commander of Krasnodar.

Previously: On 10 July, Stanislav Rzhitskiy, deputy head of the department for mobilisation, was reportedly shot dead in the city of Krasnodar, Russia. According to media reports, he was involved in missile attacks on Ukraine.
Background: In July 2022, journalists from Nashi Hroshi.Lviv published an investigation identifying the commanders of the Russian Black Sea Submarine Division. According to the data available for 2019-2021, Rzhitskiy commanded the submarine Krasnodar.
Rzhitskiy, as journalists suggest, could have been involved in the Kalibr missile attack on Vinnytsia in July last year, which claimed the lives of at least 27 people.


"Murder"?
Many have suggested Russia's military adventure in Ukraine is a war-crime from the start.
When an enemy military commander is killed during a War, it's "murder"?

And while it may seem Ukraine is responsible, any other suspects?
 
On July 11, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov criticized Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda’s proposal to establish permanent military NATO bases near the Russian border, claiming that Russia never moved its military infrastructure westward:
“It seems that the Europeans do not understand this mistake, here, it is very important to be aware that the Russian military infrastructure has never moved toward Western Europe, there has always been a movement in the opposite direction.”
That is false.

Over the last two decades, Russia has built dozens of new military bases and reactivated Soviet army installations along its borders with Western Europe. In 2014, Russia began a clandestine military operation in eastern Ukraine and in 2022 launched a neocolonial war against Ukraine, attempting to expand Moscow’s military westward. In 2023, Russia began deploying tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, which borders three NATO countries — Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.

Below is a brief catalog of Russian military progress in Europe. ...


If you follow the link you'll see it's quite a long list. So much for historical revisionism.
 
Back
Top