Shiftless2
Well-known member
Now I know you're trolling
HEADLINES: 2026
- Thread starter sear
- Start date
Trump has done lots of illegal things, but paying hush money and labeling it as legal expenses is not one of them.
There is no question is it Letitia who should be the one prosecuted for that violation of law.
The only time anyone has any say in what booking label is used is when it is to avoid paying taxes.
And clearly hush money is not something you derive pleasure out of paying, and it is a legitimate tax write off.
BBC
JD,
The reason you lost is you suck. Go bang a sofa. There's one in the oval office.
'The reason we lost is the war,' JD Vance says after Democrats take control of Congress
Democrat leads by fewer than 50 votes in MississippiJD,
The reason you lost is you suck. Go bang a sofa. There's one in the oval office.
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Staffer: Sir, the dog had a minor incident on the couch
Kash Patel: Did someone say dog?
JD Vance: Couch?
Trump: Minor?
Which war?
There is the Ukraine, Palestine, Iran, and Venezuela?
ICE could also be considered a war?
sear: ha !
Your counterpoint is sharp enough to cut glass R5.
Do you suppose JD is aware of them?
Or perhaps he's so burdened by guilt over the Iran War the others seem insignificant to him in comparison?
bonus trivia:
When will the MOC elect be sworn in (thereby displacing MAGA detritus)?
- hurry -
Shiftless2
Well-known member
I fixed your post
Guilt vs stupidity:
Guilt refers to the conscience burden of responsibility for detriment.
Stupidity refers to intellectual inadequacy, incompetence.
We agree, it was stupid. BUT !
Vance was a United States marine,
U.S. senator from Ohio,
is a published author, has a
BA from OSU,
JD from Yale, is
current vice president of the United States,
apparently with further ambition within the exec.
You're too lenient S2.
Stupidity CERTAINLY would explain it.
Doesn't treacherous destructive malice also?
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Safe to say that both guilt and stupidity apply here
Alarmingly accurate " to say that both guilt and stupidity apply here" S2 #509, edited by bloke wearing the following T-shirt art -
Bernie Sanders [I-VT] says he won't back Schumer [D-NY] as push for new leadership gains steam
Bernie Sanders says he won't back Schumer as push for new leadership gains steam
Bernie Sanders and Elissa Slotkin say they will not support Chuck Schumer for Senate majority leader, calling for a new generation of leadership.
www.foxnews.com
John Thune [R-SD] is the current Senate Majority Leader. BUT !
When the Democrat majority is sworn in early next year, the Democrats will need a majority leader.
Senator Schumer [D-NY] is recognized as a committed (some might say "hard-working") MOC.
BUT, some may believe the election results indicate a desire for change, and that may mean a change in leadership.
... can't replace somebody with nobody. If not Schumer, who ?
Bernie Sanders [I-VT] says he won't back Schumer [D-NY] as push for new leadership gains steam
Bernie Sanders says he won't back Schumer as push for new leadership gains steam
Bernie Sanders and Elissa Slotkin say they will not support Chuck Schumer for Senate majority leader, calling for a new generation of leadership.
John Thune [R-SD] is the current Senate Majority Leader. BUT !
When the Democrat majority is sworn in early next year, the Democrats will need a majority leader.
Senator Schumer [D-NY] is recognized as a committed (some might say "hard-working") MOC.
BUT, some may believe the election results indicate a desire for change, and that may mean a change in leadership.
... can't replace somebody with nobody. If not Schumer, who ?
Bernie is my favorite.
It is too bad Hillary cheated him out of the party nomination, because he would have been one heck of a good president.
No problem plugging your favorite MOC, but
it doesn't plug the leadership vacuum.
Chaz Schumer may mean well.
But I can't in good conscience let him off the hook for Biden's dotage blindsiding the Democrat's 2024 presidential race.
The one VP Harris had to leap into about a hundred days before the election.
I'm not (entirely) advocating for the nostalgic "smoke-filled room", where behind the scenes horse-trading helped pick the candidate. BUT !
I can't help but believe if minority leader Schumer [D-NY] had been sufficiently less hands-off,
the Dems. could have picked a candidate that could have / would have beat Trump in 2024.
SURELY there's more to it than that, but that alone is enough for me to be alert to the realization, it may be time to hand Democrat leadership off
to some body younger & smarter.