"a real estate investor has announced that he'll travel in a submersible to the Titanic to prove it's a safe journey." #135
- twit -
I'm pretty sure I posted this before:
The bathysphere story:
Along-tenured oceanographer was taking a PhD candidate down the bottom at mid-ocean.
It was so deep that in hydro-dynamic free-fall it took the bathysphere 45 minutes to reach bottom.
The bathysphere was cramped, cluttered further with instruments suited to this particular dive.
Those instruments included a powerful laptop computer, and an HD flat-panel display.
The more tenured scientist spent the 45 minutes of the descent reviewing details of the location, and of today's tasks:
topology
geology
bio-forms
etc.
Their submersion time was limited, so when they reached bottom the more tenured scientist took up his half of the space to peer through the 8" glass view-port, allowing the student the other half.
But the young student / doctoral candidate didn't.
Instead, the student took his place before the flat-panel display, which it turns out actually provides the better view.
This was not merely an education for the more tenured oceanographer. Near as I can tell it was the beginning of the end of the bathysphere.
We (they) now use unmanned drones, robots either connected by cable to the surface ship / mother ship, or not.
And their goings on can be monitored via multiple high-res cameras on multiple view screens, clearly the superior view.
I understand, some of these submersibles offer a lot better unaided view than an 8" diameter view port.
None the less, do the risk : benefit calculation, going that deep is pointless needless risk.
Perhaps there's some scientifically poorly understood inverse proportion between IQ & bank balance.
If I had that kind of $cash I'd try an experiment, in 50' of water.
Take the sub down, see how it looks.
Then send a maxed out robot down to the same dive site, and see which provides the better view.
After that decide whether the risk is worth it.
ps
Some cinema may not be intended to deceive, but rather to entertain. HOWEVER
the drama of the reaction shot of the submarine commander's face, below rated crush depth, as the sub hull creeks a little,
it may get the audience's attention. But it's a poor form of education for an actual deep sea diving submariner.
Just reading about these deep sea ding-a-lings makes me feel smarter.