Florida classroom bookshelves left empty as education reform law goes into effect

More on #109

In case you were wondering just how racist we are...

The Knox County School District announced last week that it has banned the book 'Roots: The Saga of an American Family.'

When I was a teenager, my dad borrowed the full set of VHS tapes from my uncle and we spent several cold Canadian nights watching them. It was my first real exposure to the brutal realities of the Middle Passage and of slavery.

What's more? It was voted an official Tennessee state book in 2024.

The district cited a passage from the book that it said violates state law.

Evidently, the book offending passage contained "sadomasochistic abuse" (aka rape).

Omitting the brutality cheapens the reality.

Shame on you, Tennessee.

Shirt in bio.

Vid at site
 
The 100-year-old widow of a WWII veteran compared her Florida county’s efforts to ban certain books to Nazi Germany

 
Have to post this every once in a while .....


1780342723541.png
1780342777650.png
1780342822517.png
1780342858735.png
1780342892281.png
1780342929404.png
1780342975686.png
1780343017952.png
The original author of this lives in a country with good sexual education that covers homosexuality, transsexuality, sexual abuse, STDs and pregnancy. They still have problems but they have very, very few teen pregnancies and much less sexual abuse and pedophilia.
 
"Have to post this every once in a while ....." S2 #207
Question:
A responsible adult offers a young vulnerable child the "good touch / bad touch" insight.
Then what?
There may be some marginal benefit to validating an abuse victim's dislike of an encounter.

But as the abuser is sometimes an adult in a position of trust, whether a parent, a teacher, or clergy,
what further guidance can we offer children, after the "good touch / bad touch" basics? Call the police?
 
"What guidance? In this case it was tell someone - the point of that chapter in the book." S2 #209
I didn't read the book. I skimmed the cartoon.

I was born in '54, probably reached adulthood before the "good touch / bad touch" lesson was taught.
So beyond the title I don't know how practical the lesson is.
 
"Thanks, Moms for Liberty!" #211
TMfL !

Webster01.JPG hoist by one's own petard
meaning: victimized by one's own scheme

Where does the phrase hoist with one's own petard come from?

Aside from historical references to siege warfare, and occasional contemporary references to fireworks, petard is almost always encountered in variations of the phrase "hoist with one's own petard," meaning "victimized or hurt by one's own scheme."
The phrase comes from William Shakespeare's Hamlet: "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hoist in this case is the past participle of the verb hoise, meaning "to lift or raise," and petar(d) refers to an explosive device used in siege warfare.
Hamlet uses the example of the engineer (the person who sets the explosive device) being blown into the air by his own device as a metaphor for those who schemed against him being undone by their own schemes.
 
A new report alleges that public libraries and publishers are censoring faith from the American story while actively pushing progressive, revisionist history to young readers.

The study by conservative publisher Brave Books, titled "The America 250 Faith Gap," analyzed more than 300 books across 25 reading lists curated by children's publishers, public libraries and other institutional sources for the nation’s upcoming 250th anniversary. The study reportedly found zero titles directly addressing faith, religious liberty or Christianity's role in the founding of the United States, despite religious liberty
 
Thanks for pointing that article out. But when they complain that "[the] study reportedly found zero titles directly addressing faith, religious liberty or Christianity's role in the founding of the United States, despite religious liberty being enshrined in the First Amendment." they are intentionally missing the point.

Fact is, the Founding Fathers would not be considered Christian by the standards of today's Evangelicals - many were actually Deists. And the Constitution contains exactly two references to God and/or religion - both are negative.

1782234987669.png
 
Florida hasn't just banned books "[they're] bringing a new lesson into classrooms.
🇺🇸
📚


A new education mandate requires Florida public schools to teach students about the dangers and historical impact of communism, with supporters saying the goal is to strengthen civic awareness and protect democratic values.

What do you think—should schools play a bigger role in teaching students about the history and dangers of political ideologies?

1787483280357.png

Better they learn about fascism because ....

1787483320182.png

SOURCE with comments
 
An array of Kennedys : [3]

"...our nation needs the services of organizations who will remain vigilant in the defense of our principles." President John F. Kennedy

"If we cannot end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity." John F. Kennedy

"when we make peaceful protest impossible we make violent protest inevitable" sometimes attributed to JFK

&

"What is objectionable, what is dangerous, about extremists is not that they are extreme, but that they are intolerant. The evil is not what they say about their cause, but what they say about their opponents." Robert Kennedy (1925-68)

or

“The senate is notoriously slow. uh Sometimes it takes us months to get nothing done.” John Kennedy [R-LA] on FNS 26/03/08

Thanks you S2 for the grim reminder of just how far we have fallen. At this dark hour, no persuasive evidence we will ever recover.
 
1788890601704.png

This is huge: Governor Maura Healey just punched back against Republican efforts to ban books across America.

Governor Maura Healey has signed Massachusetts’ new “Freedom to Read” law, creating statewide protections for books in public schools and libraries and establishing a clear process for reviewing challenges to library materials.

The law also strengthens protections for librarians and educators who have increasingly found themselves caught in the middle of political battles over books.

And the timing matters.

Across the country, book challenges and removals have surged in recent years. Republican-led states including Florida, Texas, Utah and Iowa have been at the center of some of the most prominent fights over what books students can access in schools and libraries.

The targets have ranged widely—from books dealing with race and American history to novels featuring LGBTQ characters, sexuality, abuse, grief and other difficult subjects. Put simply: Republicans want to ban books that paint Republicans in a bad light.

Critics argue that these policies go much further, allowing political officials and organized groups to remove books from shelves and limit what entire communities can read.

Massachusetts is now taking a very different approach.

Under the new law, challenges to books still can be made. But decisions must follow established standards and a transparent review process rather than simply removing books because of political pressure.

That distinction is important.

This isn’t a law saying every book belongs in every classroom.

It’s a law saying decisions about books should follow a fair process—and that librarians and teachers shouldn’t face retaliation simply for doing their jobs.

At a moment when battles over books have become a major political issue across America, Massachusetts has officially planted its flag on the side of protecting access to reading.

And Governor Maura Healey just put that protection into law.


SOURCE with comments
 
Back
Top