You do NOT want any injections into the blood stream.
The blood stream is only for food distribution.
The immune system uses the lymphatic vascular system.
That is what all vaccinations want to use.
Below The Fold ...
- Thread starter sear
- Start date
You do NOT want any injections into the blood stream.
The blood stream is only for food distribution.
The immune system uses the lymphatic vascular system.
That is what all vaccinations want to use.
Totally wrong.
Asteroids we could not see before could not be counted.
There has never been a case of autism that we could not see and count before.
View attachment 6144
Child marriage with parental consent is still legal in Wisconsin. Republicans have blocked Democratic efforts to change that.
Nearly 300 16- and 17-year-olds were married in Wisconsin over the past decade.wisconsinwatch.org
Marriage is cultural and religious, so not under government jurisdiction.
The only thing government should legally do is set age limits for sexual activity, not marriage.
And that likely should be more like 16 or 17, not 18.
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Marriage is a secular matter, not a religious one. The government decides who can and cannot get married. Don't forget that it took a Supreme Court ruling to legalize same sex marriage. And you can't marry your cousin in the US. And then there's the question of avunculate marriage (banned in almost all states but acceptable, and encouraged, in much of the rest of the world)
Besides, absent that piece of paper called a marriage license (issued by the secular authorities) that church service is nothing more than a fancy ceremony with no legal import whatsoever. For that matter you can go down to City Hall and get married by a JP with no religious involvement whatsoever.
The age of consent in the US varies by state and ranges from 16 to 18 with 16 being the most common. BTW, there are exceptions - if the older party is in a "position of authority" (teacher, police officer, etc.) the age of consent is often higher (21?). And the age of consent for same sex activities is often higher.
And even then many states (but not all) have a "close in age" exemption (sometimes called a Romeo and Juliet law) that says that someone under the age of consent can have sex provided the older party is no more that a fixed number of years older (there is a minimum age below which someone can't give consent).
And that varies as you move around the world. For example, the age of consent in Canada is 16 [until relatively recently it was 14] but the close in age exemption says that a 14 or 15 year old can have sex provided the older party is less than 5 years older. Anyone younger that 14 can't give consent as a matter of law.
Last edited:
R5,
I may be more wobbly on this than you.
My aversion here is "autism". The medical term is "autism spectrum disorder".
Some maladies, like a compound fracture are unambiguous. The patient has it, or not. BUT !
Diagnosis of "autism spectrum disorder" can be more subtle.
I'm missing a key point.
Aren't I ?
autism spectrum disorder
n.
A neurodevelopmental disorder starting in early childhood, characterized by impairments in social interaction and communication and by restricted or repetitive patterns of behavior, with symptoms varying from mild to severe.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition copyright ©2022 by HarperCollins Publishers. All rights reserved.
I disagree.
I do not see marriage as a function of government at all.
Rather than religious, I consider it cultural.
The original idea of marriage historically was to provide protection for dependents.
I do not see most marriage laws as being too draconian, but clearly the laws are too picky, such as not allowing same sex marriage until recently, Mississippi having a marriage age of 21, etc.
Law has no possible jurisdiction over marriage since those laws would be preventing individual rights instead of protecting them.
R5,
I may be more wobbly on this than you.
My aversion here is "autism". The medical term is "autism spectrum disorder".
Some maladies, like a compound fracture are unambiguous. The patient has it, or not. BUT !
Diagnosis of "autism spectrum disorder" can be more subtle.
I'm missing a key point.
Aren't I ?
autism spectrum disorder
n.
A neurodevelopmental disorder starting in early childhood, characterized by impairments in social interaction and communication and by restricted or repetitive patterns of behavior, with symptoms varying from mild to severe.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition copyright ©2022 by HarperCollins Publishers. All rights reserved.
Whether or not the word "autism" was frequently used in the past, the conditions and symptoms were recorded, regardless of what the malady was labeled as.
So we know that the conditions and symptoms have greatly increase, by almost 5 times greater incidence.
Which is not at all unexpected, given the way we have deliberately violated the sanctity of the food chain with toxic compounds.
The only problem is diagnosing the source, since things like rf broadcasts could be just as likely a cause as could be vaccinations.
I don't know whether the per capita autism diagnosis is fairly steady, or if it's increasing. BUT !
An increase in per capita diagnosis does not necessarily mean a corresponding increase in the population. CERTAINLY that would explain it (if that's what it is). BUT !
That's not the only possible explanation.
Another perhaps more plausible explanation, improved diagnostic techniques, within the context of other maladies receding in the population, may have merely reduced the the former 20% undiagnosed,
down to 10%, presenting the superficial appearance that the actual disease is on the increase.