Below The Fold ...
- Thread starter sear
- Start date
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Shiftless2
Well-known member
If only there was some way to prevent this. Maybe a shot or something.
reductio ad absurdum
The ancients distinguished between intrinsic wrong, they called it malumin se- evil, wrong by itself, contrasted with malum prohibitum- wrong by prohibition
In 2026 U.S.A. we straddle that fence with the Constitution.
CERTAINLY the U.S. Founders did not intend for their 3rd millennium countrymen to abuse children. Where do we draw the line?
Parents are not exempt from our Constitution's free exercise clause.
Parental withholding of vaccinations from their own children may endanger, potentially kill their own children. BUT !
The free exercise clause enumerates a Constitutional right of parents to do so.
There's no legal requirement for religious belief to be true. Faith is belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.
There isn't even a sincerity clause requiring parents to believe in anti-vax, it simply protects their right to withhold vaccination from their own children.
Chlorine for the gene-pool?
None of that gets US closer to solution. BUT !
It may at least help magnify the anguish of the problem.
United States Constitution Amendment #14: Ratified July 9, 1868
SECTION1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life,liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Normally it is hard to target and infect particular computers because the typical way of infection is to load something from an email.
At places I have worked like Intel and HP, each employee has 2 computers, one with broad internet access, and one with only local network access.
That keeps the local network computer safe usually.
But with something as important as centrifuges, the vendors could have been bribed into infecting computers before they were even purchased?
RFK Jr's vaccination schedule does not remove the vaccinations for measles, mumps, and rubella.
All it does is stop combining them.
And all doctors should have known the dangers of combining vaccinations.
The "dangers" which are?
And de-combining justifies the multiplication of $cost because ... ?
Implementing this new white house protocol multiplies the healthcare burden and the patient labor / time burden of these vax.
Isn't that what Trump / RFKj intend?
Who benefits?
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Those separate shots are not available in the US.
And the major medical associations don't agree with you on that one - who to believe "The American Academy of Pediatrics" or a heroin addict who snorts cocaine off of toilet seats and eats roadkill?? Especially when the one with the brain worm is making recommendations that are dangerous.
West Coast Health Alliance sticks with pediatric vaccine schedules despite Trump order
The West Coast Health Alliance says it will continue to endorse the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommended child and adolescent immunization schedules.
katu.com
New Mexico says childhood vaccine recommendations will remain unchanged
New Mexico health officials say the state will maintain its full childhood vaccination recommendations and continue using the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule as a guide.
www.organmountainnews.com
Could you be more specific?
Some of the less unappetizing selections from the - You kill it, we grill it! - portion of the
Road Kill Cafe' menu:
- Smear of Deer
- Anything Dead on Bread
- Glistening Guts Goulash
For those that prefer more of a challenge:
- Rigor Mortis Tortoise
mmm yummy
Shiftless2
Well-known member
“Everybody has their own path in life, and it has not one thing to do with me, and I don’t have one thing to do with them,”
Oprah Finally Addresses the Trumpy Doctors She Made Into Stars
The two men used Oprah Winfrey’s talk show to launch major careers.
Fact is she gave them air and fame knowing they were extremely bad people with major qualification issues.
Perhaps I'm not objective on this, but I think of Oprah as near American royalty.
Winfrey was born into poverty in rural Mississippi to a single teenage mother and later raised in inner-city Milwaukee.[13]
Oprah Winfrey - Wikipedia
Oprah has achieved superlative celebrity* with her several talents, and seemingly inexhaustible work ethic, despite humble origin, lesser gender, and darker color.
That's not an endorsement of the deviations of her associates.
But it's an acknowledgement those that achieve as mightily as Oprah has, generally leave some ripples astern.
Objective criticism of her must not merely acknowledge Oz pooh, but recognize it in context of what she has achieved
as a talk-show host, movie actress, and generally constructive if not inspirational presence in our culture.
Her boat is bigger than your house.
* Not merely recognizable, but recognizable by a single name: "Oprah".
Shiftless2
Well-known member
So she's not responsible for making these people famous and giving them a voice in government?
So she made business decisions with entertainment foresight,
not antagonistic political hindsight.
I do not know if Oprah would have given these doctors a hand up if she knew then what you and I know now.
You seem more comfortable assuming she would.
I confess my agnosticism, noting that over a spectacular career with the cards stacked against her,
we have to grope at fairly fine granularity to find a quibble.
I'm not pretending to be an Oz fan.
Instead I'm demonstrating my meager skill at processing more than one thought at a time.
Oprah has done some bad.
Oprah has done some good.
My opinion, based on what I know today, 5PM/ET August 14, 2026 leads me to the conclusion Oprah doesn't seem particularly malicious,
and seems to me to have been a net positive influence on our / her culture.
This may not mean much to you, but I sincerely believe Oprah would be a substantially better POTUS than Trump.
Dr. Phil? Is he in the Trump cabinet?
Oprah may have put these guys in public view.
I'm not sure we can hold her responsible for how they leveraged their own celebrity after that.
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Without her they wouldn't be in a position where people would hear the nonsense they push.
BTW - since he has a PhD he is a real doctor (different discussion but the origin of the title "Doctor" came from the Latin for teacher so the real question is whether MD's should be called doctor).
The danger and problem of combining multiple vaccinations is that we do not know how the immune system stores immunity information.
But in general, it has to mean chemical structures have to be appended.
And when you try to do several immunities at the exact same time, then you run the risk of the appended structures interfering or interlacing with each other.
There just is never any reason to do it.
It can not cost more to simply space out immunities instead of combining them.
Those separate shots are not available in the US.
And the major medical associations don't agree with you on that one - who to believe "The American Academy of Pediatrics" or a heroin addict who snorts cocaine off of toilet seats and eats roadkill?? Especially when the one with the brain worm is making recommendations that are dangerous.
West Coast Health Alliance sticks with pediatric vaccine schedules despite Trump order
The West Coast Health Alliance says it will continue to endorse the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommended child and adolescent immunization schedules.
New Mexico says childhood vaccine recommendations will remain unchanged
New Mexico health officials say the state will maintain its full childhood vaccination recommendations and continue using the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule as a guide.
It should be trivial to simply not combine vaccines.
No one actually knows exactly how immunity information is stored by the immune system except that it is done in the bone marrow T-cells.
Absolutely nothing is gained by combining immunizations.
"Simple" indeed!
Simple, but with the penalty of multiplying the cost of administering them, knowing that key to reducing per capita healthcare cost is $efficiency.
I wouldn't assume that.
Either way, ignorance is not peril. It is lack of assurance. And we have enough history to know the risks of not administering these vaccinations exceed that of doing so.
An immunological truism perhaps.
But in the reality of industrialized vaccinations, the standards of industrial efficiency apply as well in automobile manufacture as they do in containing measles outbreaks.
Since it only takes a few second to administer a vaccination, I see nothing gained by combining them.
It takes more time for the patient to come in 3 times instead of just once, but that is not really much of a factor.
What if by administering 3 vaccines at once, the immune system considers the 3 different pathogens as 1 really large pathogen?
Then all potential usefulness of the 3 vaccines is totally lost.
Shiftless2
Well-known member
You really have gone down that rabbit hole haven't you.
The reality is we do not know how immunity works.
While we can tell if immunity works, what other countries believe is that they should not be combined and not given as young as we do.