Just a little humor

But what big pharma is not willing to tell us is that not only did the mRNA vaccines not work at all, but there is a limit to how many functional immunities anyone can have.
Big pharma is not telling us that there are actually hundreds of different viruses we call "flu", and it is harmful to try to get more than around 10 different immunities or so.
You really have gone down the anti-vaxx rabbit hole haven't you. :(
 
" there is a limit to how many functional immunities anyone can have." R5 #1,523
Makes sense to me. It's difficult to imagine infinite immunities.

"Big pharma is not telling us that there are actually hundreds of different viruses we call "flu", and it is harmful to try to get more than around 10 different immunities or so." R5 #1,523
R5,
I had to scrounge to find the following, and subsequently have made it a permanent part of sear's notes.

Influenza only has 8 genes (humans have ~20K).
Two of those 8 genes are responsible for getting the virus into and out of a cell.
Viruses enter, or penetrate a cell using the Hemagglutinin gene; referred to as "H". But penetrating the cell isn't enough. After it penetrates and replicates, the replicants need to exit that cell to infect the entire host.

The gene for that is Neuraminidase, N.
In birds, there are 16 different kinds of H gene, and 9 different kinds of N. Every flu is some combination of those.

Humans have only caught a few.
The1918 influenza virus, H1N1, killed ~50M; ~3% of Earth’s human population.

Hong Kong Flu is H3N2.
Avian flu is H5N1.
 
You really have gone down the anti-vaxx rabbit hole haven't you. :(

Look it up.
The immune system memory comes from bone marrow T-cells.
But these cells only live about 10 years.
That means for something like an immunity to Polio to last over 50 years, the immunity information has to be appended to the T-cell DNA.
So that new replacement cells retain the old immunity information.
And the end of the DNA spiral is constantly lost.
There is only a small amount that can be appended reliably.
So the number of immunities you can acquire is limited.
It is not infinite.
 
Makes sense to me. It's difficult to imagine infinite immunities.


R5,
I had to scrounge to find the following, and subsequently have made it a permanent part of sear's notes.

Influenza only has 8 genes (humans have ~20K).
Two of those 8 genes are responsible for getting the virus into and out of a cell.
Viruses enter, or penetrate a cell using the Hemagglutinin gene; referred to as "H". But penetrating the cell isn't enough. After it penetrates and replicates, the replicants need to exit that cell to infect the entire host.

The gene for that is Neuraminidase, N.
In birds, there are 16 different kinds of H gene, and 9 different kinds of N. Every flu is some combination of those.

Humans have only caught a few.
The1918 influenza virus, H1N1, killed ~50M; ~3% of Earth’s human population.

Hong Kong Flu is H3N2.
Avian flu is H5N1.

Not to be picky, but humans actually have exactly 23 chromosome pairs, for a total of 46 chromosomes.
And actually, each chromosome can then have thousands of genes.

Since viruses have the ability to knock on the ACE2 receptors of our cells and be let in, it is likely they all evolved from exosomes that are supposed to have that key to be let in.

So the number of different viruses is pretty much infinite.
But they all need to have something similar for activating the ACE2 receptor.
However, targeting that ACE2 key is not a good idea since then you also risk having an autoimmune response against our own exosomes.

Meaning that what I have read is that the flu vaccines not only are a hoax, but very dangerous in that they take away from existing natural immunities.
 
"So the number of different viruses is pretty much infinite." R5 #1,527
I have no scientific reason to question that.
My #1,525 wasn't about all viruses, only about influenza.

"Meaning that what I have read is that the flu vaccines not only are a hoax, but very dangerous in that they take away from existing natural immunities." R5 #1,527
I have decades of industrial experience with applied statistics.
Not just statistical process control, but performance monitoring / evaluation, etc.
That in combination with my generations of observing what it takes to succeed at a conspiracy leads me to conclude the conspiracy you suggest is a virtual impossibility.

If there was some $gargantuan $payoff, some spectacular benefit to swindling billions, the conspiracy you suggest might seem to have at least a shred of plausibility.

Count me a skeptic.
 
Back
Top