Israel's War on Civilization

https://imgur.com/wqN9qcR

This incident occurred on November 16, 2024.

A 64-year-old woman, Alexandra Szustakiewicz, was arrested and charged with two felony hate crime counts and disorderly conduct after attacking a Palestinian-American couple at a Downers Grove Panera Bread. The incident, recorded on video and widely shared on Reddit, showed her verbally abusing and physically assaulting the couple, including attempting to throw hot coffee and hitting the man, over his "Free Palestine" sweatshirt.

The confrontation, targeting the man and his pregnant wife, has fueled discussions on anti-Palestinian sentiment, with the couple facing both support and threats online.

abc7chicago.com

Woman charged in alleged anti-Palestinian hate crime inside Downers Grove Panera due in court

Dowers Grove police said she started a fight with a couple at a Panera, because of what they were wearing.
abc7chicago.com abc7chicago.com

1761056657751.png


1761056675688.png
 

Israel....where the rapists walk free, and the whistle blowers are under investigation​

1761847295711.png

1761847333645.png


QOQbnv4.jpeg


www.aljazeera.com

Israeli protesters rally for ‘the right to rape’ prisoners

Protesters, politicians and TV commentators in Israel are defending the right of soldiers to mistreat prisoners.
www.aljazeera.com www.aljazeera.com
 

This is Israel, this is what Israel does to Palestinians every day. This is what every US politician supports, what every Israeli politician supports, what they have made illegal to protest or object to.​


EFaIsmr.jpeg


wQXflxV.jpeg


MlCE9T5.jpeg


xOtAoNw.jpeg


Just imagine, just for a fleeting second, what the worlds reaction would be if this, any of this, were being done by Palestinians to Israelis.

news.sky.com

Video appears to show IDF soldiers sexually abusing Palestinian detainee

CCTV broadcast by an Israeli television channel allegedly shows IDF soldiers leading away a prisoner before sexually abusing the person behind their shields.
news.sky.com news.sky.com

www.haaretz.com

Ex-top IDF lawyer hospitalized as authorities examine possible suicide attempt

Concerns Were Raised That Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi, Former IDF Chief Legal Officer, Swallowed Sleeping Pills, a Source Said. She Was Arrested Last Week After Being Embroiled in a Scandal Over the Leak of a Video Showing Israeli Soldiers Abusing a Palestinian at an Israeli Detention Facility
www.haaretz.com www.haaretz.com
 
Shiftless2 said:
"Israel has attacked Gaza nearly every day of the ceasefire" November 10, 2025 #87
Click to expand...
The United States has retained a less than wholesome political stand on this troubled area through Democrat and Republican administrations alike.

Why?
Because we're not smart enough to know better?

Apparently the Israeli lobby has obtained from U.S. politics a commitment more reliable than U.S. commitment to fairness, anti-oppression.

Innocent civilians are dying there, with full knowledge of U.S. federal government.
Is it any wonder innocent civilians are dying here in the U.S., in Minnesota, with full knowledge of U.S. federal government?

"Choose your enemy well, for he is who you will become." old Hebrew adage
Click to expand...
Not only does this look dire both there and here.
But reasonable projections of current U.S. politics suggest Renee Good, & Alex Pretti will not be the last to die at the hands of Trump's bloodthirsty henchmen.

Three more years ! Three more years ! Three more years ! Three more years ! Three more years ! Three more years ! Three more years ! Three more years !
 
sear said:
Is that not a violation of international law? BUT !
Israel claims its enemy uses such infrastructure as hospitals and schools as base for military combat operations. Would that not also violate international law?

In the NFL "those penalties offset ..." . It appears digging deeper will be required to implement a permanent resolution.
Click to expand...

Actually it is not a violation of international law to use hospitals or schools as headquarters for military operations.
It is only a violation to use them for things like weapons depots.
But the Palestinians have no weapons really, so can't really be in violation.

In fact, Palestine is like the French Resistance in WWII, and are pretty much justified in doing anything they can, since they are the victim.
Israel has stolen over 90% of Palestine, and imposed a starvation blockade for decades.
The Palestinians are justified in doing anything they can.
 
Rigby5 said:
"Actually it is not a violation of international law to use hospitals or schools as headquarters for military operations." R5 #90
Click to expand...
You're welcome to post authoritative support for this assertion. The following source contradicts you: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/protection-hospitals-during-armed-conflicts-what-law-says

Military headquarters so far as I know legitimate warfare targets. Hospitals are not, unless such hospital is not neutral.

Rigby5 said:
"It is only a violation to use them for things like weapons depots." R5 #90
Click to expand...
It is also a violation to use them for things like weapons depots.

It's basically an issue of neutrality. Such hospital is required to treat injured troops from either combatant force equally. Serving as a base of operations for either side removes that neutrality, and the protections neutrality confers.
 
sear said:
You're welcome to post authoritative support for this assertion. The following source contradicts you: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/protection-hospitals-during-armed-conflicts-what-law-says

Military headquarters so far as I know legitimate warfare targets. Hospitals are not, unless such hospital is not neutral.


It is also a violation to use them for things like weapons depots.

It's basically an issue of neutrality. Such hospital is required to treat injured troops from either combatant force equally. Serving as a base of operations for either side removes that neutrality, and the protections neutrality confers.
Click to expand...

My understanding is that military headquarters are not legal targets.
Normally assassination of generals is never done.
The only exception I know of is when the US shot down Admiral Yamamoto in WWII.
And I think that not only was illegal, but a very bad idea that cause the war to be extended, since Yamamoto wanted Japan to surrender.

Technically headquarters are not a force of aggression that can be attacked under the principle of self defense.
The laws were made by those who are likely to be in those headquarters, so they would have a vested interest.
But historically headquarters are not normally ever attacked as far as I know.
 
Rigby5 said:
"My understanding is that military headquarters are not legal targets." R5 #92
Click to expand...
Rigby5 said:
"The laws were made by those who are likely to be in those headquarters, so they would have a vested interest.
But historically headquarters are not normally ever attacked as far as I know." R5 #92
Click to expand...
When at war one must take care not to extinguish any viable authority to surrender. That's rather more pragmatism than international law.

Rigby5 said:
"Normally assassination of generals is never done." R5 #92
Click to expand...
Understood, for reasons including above, though we did it to Iran.

Rigby5 said:
"Technically headquarters are not a force of aggression that can be attacked under the principle of self defense." R5 #92
Click to expand...
The brain of a bully will never steal your lunch money. BUT !
A bully without a brain won't either.

If the commanding general is wearing the uniform, rank and insignia of the enemy, s/he's fair game. I know of no commissioned officer exception.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top