The Second Term of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States of America

Heather Cox Richardson ·
Follow​

tsoSendopr59561 0a8m1t0g5eyda2eYtfaafga9M1A4s7mg8l3r9h2:9  3 ·
https://www.facebook.com/#
March 26, 2025 (Wednesday)

Monday’s astounding story that the most senior members of President Donald Trump’s administration planned military strikes on Yemen over an unsecure commercial messaging app, on which they had included national security reporter and editor in chief of The Atlantic Jeffrey Goldberg, has escalated over the past two days.

On Monday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looked directly at a reporter’s camera and said: “Nobody was texting war plans.” Throughout the day Tuesday, the administration doubled down on this assertion, apparently convinced that Goldberg would not release the information they knew he had. They tried to spin the story by attacking Goldberg, suggesting he had somehow hacked into the conversation, although the app itself tracked that National Security Advisor Michael Waltz had added him.

Various administration figures, including Trump, insisted that the chat contained nothing classified. At a scheduled hearing yesterday before the Senate Intelligence Committee on worldwide threats, during which senators took the opportunity to dig into the Signal scandal, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said: “There was no classified material that was shared in that Signal group.” Director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Ratcliffe agreed: “My communications, to be clear, in the Signal message group were entirely permissible and lawful and did not include classified information.” In the afternoon, Trump told reporters: “The attack was totally successful. It was, I guess, from what I understand, took place during. And it wasn’t classified information. So this was not classified.”

After Gabbard said she would defer to the secretary of defense and the National Security Council about what information should have been classified, Senator Angus King (I-ME) seemed taken aback. “You’re the head of the intelligence community. You’re supposed to know about classifications,” he pointed out. He continued, “So your testimony very clearly today is that nothing was in that set of texts that were classified.... If that’s the case, please release that whole text stream so that the public can have a view of what actually transpired on this discussion. It’s hard for me to believe that targets and timing and weapons would not have been classified.”

Meanwhile, reporters were also digging into the story. James LaPorta of CBS News reported that an internal bulletin from the National Security Agency warned staff in February 2025 not to use Signal for sensitive information, citing concerns that the app was vulnerable to Russian hackers. A former White House official told Maggie Miller and Dana Nickel of Politico, “Their personal phones are all hackable, and it’s highly likely that foreign intelligence services are sitting on their phones watching them type the sh*t out."
Tuesday night, American Oversight, a nonprofit organization focusing on government transparency, filed a lawsuit against Hegseth, Gabbard, Ratcliffe, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio—all of whom were also on the Signal chain—and the National Archives for violating the Federal Records Act, and suggested the administration has made other attempts to get around the law. It notes that the law requires the preservation of federal records.

Today it all got worse.

It turned out that administration officials’ conviction that Goldberg wouldn’t publicly release receipts was wrong. This morning, Goldberg and Shane Harris, who had worked together on the initial story, wrote: “The statements by Hegseth, Gabbard, Ratcliffe, and Trump—combined with the assertions made by numerous administration officials that we are lying about the content of the Signal texts—have led us to believe that people should see the texts in order to reach their own conclusions. There is a clear public interest in disclosing the sort of information that Trump advisers included in nonsecure communications channels, especially because senior administration figures are attempting to downplay the significance of the messages that were shared.”

The Atlantic published screenshots of the message chat.

The screenshots make clear that administration officials insisting that there was nothing classified on the chat were lying. Hegseth uploaded the precise details of the attack before it happened, leaving American military personnel vulnerable. The evidence is damning.

The fury of Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), an Army pilot who was nearly killed in Iraq, was palpable. “Pete Hegseth is a f*cking liar,” she wrote. “This is so clearly classified info he recklessly leaked that could’ve gotten our pilots killed. He needs to resign in disgrace immediately.” Legal analyst Barb McQuade pointed out that it didn't even matter if the information was classified: it is “a crime to remove national defense information from its proper place through gross negligence…. Signal chat is not a proper place.”

The screenshots also raise a number of other issues. They made it clear that administration officials have been using Signal for other conversations: Waltz at one point typed: “As we stated in the first PC….” Using a nongovernment system is likely an attempt to get around the laws that require the preservation of public records. The screenshots also show that Signal was set to erase the messages on the chat after 4 weeks.

The messages reveal that President Trump was not part of the discussion of whether to make the airstrikes, a deeply troubling revelation that raises the question of who is in charge at the White House. As the conversation about whether to attack took place, Vice President J.D. Vance wrote about Trump’s reasoning that attacking the Houthis in Yemen would “send a message”: “I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now.” Later, he texted to Hegseth: “if you think we should do it let’s go. I just hate bailing Europe out again. Let’s just make sure our messaging is tight here. And if there are things we can do upfront to minimize risk to Saudi oil facilities we should do it.”

Hegseth responded: “VP: I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC. But Mike is correct, we are the only ones on the planet (on our side of the ledger) who can do this. Nobody else even close. Question is timing. I feel like now is as good a time as any, given POTUS directive to reopen shipping lanes. I think we should go; but POTUS still retains 24 hours of decision space.”

The decision to make the strikes then appears to have been made by deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who ended the discussion simply by invoking the president: “As I heard it,” he wrote, “the president was clear: green light, but we soon make it clear to Egypt and Europe what we expect in return. We also need to figure out how to enforce such a requirement.” If Europe doesn’t cover the cost of the attack, “then what? If the US successfully restores freedom of navigation at great cost there needs to be some further economic gain extracted in return.”

“Agree,” Hegseth messaged, and the attack was on.

Also missing from the group message was the person who is currently acting as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Christopher Grady. In February, Trump fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S. Air Force General Charles Q. Brown Jr., who took on the position in 2023 having served more than 3,000 hours as a fighter pilot, including 130 hours in combat, and commanded the Pacific Air Forces, which provides air power for U.S. interests in the Asia-Pacific region; the U.S. Air Forces Central Command, responsible for protecting U.S. security interests in Africa through the Persian Gulf; the 31st Fighter Wing, covering the southern region of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); the 8th Fighter Wing, covering southeast Asia; U.S. Air Force Weapons School for advanced training in weapons and tactics for officers; and 78th Fighter Squadron.

CONTINUED
 
Part 2

Hegseth publicly suggested that Brown had been appointed because he is Black. “Was it because of his skin color? Or his skill? We’ll never know, but always doubt,” Hegseth wrote.
With Trump’s controversial replacement for Brown still unconfirmed, Admiral Grady, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, is fulfilling the role of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. But he was not in the chat. The Pentagon's highest-ranking officer would normally be included in planning a military operation.

Also in the chat, participants made embarrassing attacks on our allies and celebrated civilian deaths in Yemen in the quest to kill a targeted combatant.

Attempts to defend themselves from the scandal only dug administration officials in deeper. On Monday night, independent journalist Olga Lautman, who studies Russia, noted that Trump’s Ukraine and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff had actually been in Russia when Waltz added him to the chat, underscoring the chat’s vulnerability to hackers. By Tuesday, multiple outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, picked up Lautman’s story.

Witkoff fought back against the Wall Street Journal story with a long social media post about how he had traveled to Moscow with a secure government phone and how it was not until he got home that he had “access to my personal devices” to participate in the Signal conversation, thus apparently confirming that he was discussing classified information with the nation’s top officials on an unsecure personal device.

Tonight, news of other ways in which the administration is compromised surfaced. The German newspaper Der Spiegel revealed that the contact information for a number of the same officials who were on the Signal chat is available online, as well as email addresses and some passwords for their private accounts, making it easy for hackers to get into their personal devices. Those compromised included National Security Advisor Waltz, Director of National Intelligence Gabbard, and Secretary of Defense Hegseth. Wired reported that Waltz, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, and Walker Barrett of the National Security Council, who was also on the Signal messaging chain, had left their Venmo accounts public, demonstrating what national security experts described as reckless behavior.

In the New York Times tonight, foreign affairs journalist Noah Shachtman looked not just at the Signal scandal but also at the administration’s lowering of U.S. guard against foreign influence operations, installation of billionaire Elon Musk’s satellite internet terminals at the White House, and diversion of personnel from national security to Trump’s pet projects, and advised hostile nations to “savor this moment. It’s never been easier to steal secrets from the United States government. Can you even call it stealing when it’s this simple? The Trump administration has unlocked the vault doors, fired half of the security guards and asked the rest to roll pennies. Walk right in. Take what you want. This is the golden age.”

Trump today did not seem on top of the story when he told reporters: “I think it’s a witch hunt. I wasn’t involved with it, I wasn’t there, but I can tell you the result is unbelievable.”

When asked if he still believed there was no classified information shared, he answered: “Well, that’s what I’ve heard. I don’t know, I’m not sure. You’ll have to ask the various people involved. I really don’t know.” He said the breach was Waltz’s fault—“it had nothing to do with anyone else”—and when reporters asked about the future of Defense Secretary Hegseth, who uploaded the attack plans into the unsecure system, he answered: “Hegseth is doing a great job, he had nothing to do with this…. How do you bring Hegseth into it?

He had nothing to do with it. Look, look, it’s all a witch hunt. I don’t know that Signal works. I think Signal could be defective, to be honest with you….”

The administration appears to be trying to create a distraction from the damning story. Yesterday evening, Trump signed an executive order that would, if it could be enforced, dramatically change U.S. elections and take the vote away from tens of millions of Americans. But, as Marc Elias of Democracy Docket put it, the order is “confused, rhetorical and—in places—nonsensical. It asserts facts that are not true and claims authority he does not possess. It is not meant to be taken seriously or literally. Rather, it is the empty threat of a weak man desperate to appear strong.”

After today’s revelations, Trump announced new 25% tariffs on imported cars and car parts including those from Canada and Mexico, despite a deal worked out earlier this month that items covered under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada agreement Trump signed in his first term would not face a new tariff levy. The 25% tariff is a major change that will raise prices across the board and hit the automotive sector in which more than a million Americans work. Upon the news, the stock market fell again.

And yet, despite the attempts to bury the Signal story, the scandal seems, if anything, to be growing. House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) wrote a public letter to Trump yesterday calling for him to fire Hegseth, accurately referring to him as “the most unqualified Secretary of Defense in American history.” Jeffries wrote: “His behavior shocks the conscience, risked American lives and likely violated the law.” “[H]ey Sen[ator Joni] Ernst and Sen[ator Thom] Tillis,” Jen Rubin of The Contrarian wrote tonight, “proud of your votes for Hegseth? This is on [you] too as much as Hegseth. You knew he was not remotely qualified.”
 

Heather Cox Richardson ·​

March 26, 2025 (Wednesday)

"The Atlantic published screenshots of the message chat.
The screenshots make clear that administration officials insisting that there was nothing classified on the chat were lying." #381
America in particular and the world in general needs to embrace the new paradigm.

Does "lying" from this Trump administration qualify as news? Wouldn't fidelity, factual accuracy be the more unusual headline?

OF COURSE disclosing U.S. military battle plans via not secure medium, on personal cell phones is a U.S. national security violation. - but -

Trump & henchmen are apparently above the law.

The true impact of this U.S. security breach by President Trump's inner circle goes far beyond Houthis in Yemen.
There were reportedly "sources & methods" exposures here.
And while that can possibly result in useful intelligence assets being murdered, that's not the least of it.

The U.S. is now recognized as an unreliable intelligence partner. So the Trump administration's feed of accurate threat identification and assessment may be damaged or broken.

This mess may have sewn the seed of our next 09/11/01.

- get ready -
 

Alt National Park Service ·​

endrtopsoSmll39f5gg90llc0uc1t885l60m311l55ll8it9fa2h78l55fgt ·

https://www.facebook.com/#
Dr. Peter Marks, the Food and Drug Administration’s leading vaccine expert, abruptly resigned citing Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s aggressive and misleading stance on vaccines as a threat to public health.

“It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies,” Dr. Marks wrote in a resignation letter addressed to acting FDA Commissioner Sara Brenner.

Dr. Marks was forced to step down after being given an ultimatum by a Department of Health and Human Services official: resign or be fired.

The resignation followed a series of controversial remarks by Kennedy earlier that day in West Virginia, where he claimed Covid-19 “did not kill healthy people”—a statement contradicted by data showing that around 30% of early pandemic deaths occurred in individuals without underlying conditions.

Kennedy has also raised concerns for promoting vitamin A as a treatment during a recent measles outbreak in Texas, while minimizing the proven effectiveness of vaccines. Just a day before Dr. Marks’ departure, Kennedy announced the creation of a new federal office dedicated to investigating vaccine injuries.

The resignation underscores growing tensions within federal health agencies as scientific leaders push back against politically driven misinformation.
 
486969045_10106982570614374_2583121157685120791_n.jpg


Matt Mikalatos

Here's 24-year-old Frengel Reyes Mota, a Venezuelan immigrant with no criminal record in the States or in Venezuela.

He's not part of a gang.

He's not said anything about Gaza or Israel.

He's just a house painter who left his home country due to the unrest and difficulties there, and came to the US legally seeking asylum.

He didn't show up for his asylum hearing this week, though, because when he showed up for his regular ICE check-in -- which he should as a legal immigrant in the US -- ICE arrested him and soon deported him to the largest prison in Latin America, the notorious Terrorism Confinement Center in El Salvador.

If you haven't heard of this prison, it's a 57 acre facility where prisoners are held in cells of about 150 prisoners. There are racks of bunks four-high, two toilets and two Bibles per cell. Prisoners are only let outside of their cell for 30 minutes a day for exercise or Bible study. No recreation, visitation, or phone calls are allowed. The lights are kept on in the cells 24/7. There are a number of controversies and allegations of human rights violations in this prison.

What did Reyes Mota do so that ICE took him into custody without charges and illegally removed him from the court system before transferring him to an extra-national prison for terrorists?

Nothing.

In fact, when ICE showed up at his asylum hearing this week and revealed the arrest paperwork it HAD THE WRONG NAME IN IT SIX TIMES. And not a misspelled name, it was talking about someone named Carlos Ortiz-Morales. Other sections referred to Reyes Mota as "she" and "her" and at least once a different person's immigration number was listed in the description. It was arrest by Chatgpt hallucination or gross human incompetence or both.

And when this was pointed out in court at Reyes Mota's asylum hearing by his lawyer this week, when the judge asked ICE if they made a mistake, the ICE lawyers said they'd "look into it."

As more of these cases are coming out, I keep hearing well-meaning people say "There's more to the story."

I get it. It's disorienting to think that a country that says things like "innocent until proven guilty" or "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" would also arrest an innocent man and fly him off to a gigantic horror show of a prison. So there MUST be "more to the story" even though Reyes Mota has no criminal record, isn't part of a gang, doesn't have a gang tattoo or even have a tattoo at all.

"There's more to the story."

THEN PROVE IT IN COURT.

If there's more to the story the US government should have just rolled into the asylum hearing this week and proved it. But they didn't because their paperwork DIDN'T EVEN HAVE THE RIGHT NAME ON IT throughout the document. And they couldn't prove it anyway, because there's nothing to prove.

PLUS: to remove an asylum applicant without a court order is ILLEGAL. This is a very clear case where -- unlike Reyes Mota --ICE broke the law.

So, here's your "more to the story":

Reyes Mota is married. He married a woman who already had a son, so he's the father to a 9 year old boy. He's got a dog that he loves named Sacha. The family doesn't have tons of money, so Reyes Mota carefully plans the budget so he can occasionally buy his dog treats. Reyes Mota is a hard worker, a legal immigrant, a good husband and father, a financially responsible tax-paying part of the US community.

Or he was.

This week the judge in Reyes Mota's asylum case "froze" the case. Meaning that if Reyes Mota returns to the country he can pick up where he left off. Assuming he can be released.

Assuming he's brought back to the US.

While he was still in detention, before he was flown out of the country, Reyes Mota was able to talk to his family. He asked if his dog was eating okay. He wanted to know how his son was doing in school.

Of course he's not allowed to make any phone calls now so his family has no idea if he's okay, how he's doing, what's happening.

ICE is "looking into it."
 
"Here's 24-year-old Frengel Reyes Mota, a Venezuelan immigrant with no criminal record in the States or in Venezuela. ...
He's just a house painter" #386

xe·no·pho·bi·a (zē′nə-fōbēə, zĕn′ə-)
n.
Fear of, hatred of, mistrust of, or contempt for that which is foreign, especially strangers or people from different countries or cultures.
xe′no·phobic adj.
Usage Note: Xenophobia has long had two acceptable pronunciations: the traditional pronunciation with a short e in the first syllable, and a variant with a long e. In our 2015 survey, the Usage Panel overwhelmingly found both forms to be acceptable.
Slightly more Panelists (55 percent as compared to 45 percent) use the long-e pronunciation in their own speech.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition copyright ©2022 by HarperCollins Publishers. All rights reserved.


What's alarming / revealing, it's likely Trump may not really care much if at all for these fellow humans.
Instead Trump is subjecting these millions to these life-changing adversities for Trump's own political fortunes.

The good news is, this level of sociopathy may be relatively rare.
The bad news is, he's president until 2029.
 

They got jail time for leaking gov’t secrets

Igti6Lc.jpeg


Her name is Reality Winner. She’s in jail for 5 years and 3 months for leaking classified information in the social media

0HKvaem.jpeg


This is Jack Teixira. He’s in jail for 15 years for leaking classified information on social media

ShsqSZQ.jpeg


All these people, leaked classified information in an unsecured group chat in social media. No jail time. So why are they exemptions to rule of law?
 
"All these people, leaked classified information in an unsecured group chat in social media. No jail time. So why are they exemptions to rule of law?" #388
a) Sensible question.
b) You're not the only one to ask it.
Some murmuring suggests presidents are exempt.
I don't recall any plausible annotated legal argument supporting the assertion. BUT !!

We are not likely to see diminution of the Trump rampage until the rule of law is restored.
It would appear therefore, those in a position to enforce the law here see fit to not bother.

Business Insider

Tesla owners are offloading their cars in droves​

Kenneth Niemeyer / Thu, March 27, 2025 at 1:49 PM EDT

  • One industry expert attributed the rise in part to Elon Musk's actions.
  • Tesla also faces other challenges in the EV market including increased competition and an aging lineup.
Used Tesla listings jumped by 33% so far this year with at least one industry expert saying CEO Elon Musk's antics continue to have an "undeniable" impact on the brand.

Citing Autotrader data, analysts for Cox Automotive said Wednesday that Tesla listings jumped from around 8,500 at the beginning of 2025 to 11,515 on March 16. Still, the company saw increases in all other EV listings during the same period at 27% year-to-date, said Stephanie Valdez Streaty, Cox Automotive's director of industry insights, in an industry forecast.

Many public servants devote their labor for noble reason.
I suspect Elon Musk chose the Trump bandwagon hoping to improve his own lot, "richest man in the world" evidently not good enough.

Yet to be determined, will it end up being a net gain, or a net loss for Musk?
 
The Independent

Rep. Elise Stefanik ‘scrambled’ to try to change Trump’s mind about pulling her UN nomination​

Graig Graziosi / Fri, March 28, 2025 at 2:04 PM EDT

Republican Congresswoman Elise Stefanik reportedly was shocked by Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw his nomination for her to become the country's UN Ambassador, according to people familiar with the issue.
Trump’s decision leaves Stefanik in a difficult situation as she was preparing to leave her congressional seat to serve in his administration. According to Axios, most of her congressional staff have resigned, and she has already given up her slot on the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump announced on Thursday that he wants Stefanik to remain in Congress to keep her district in Republican control following the 2026 midterm elections.

"Donald Trump won the Elise Stefanik district by 21 points in November 2024. He withdrew her nomination to be U.N. Ambassador because the extremists are afraid they will lose the special election to replace her," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in a statement. "The Republican agenda is extremely unpopular, they are crashing the economy in real time and House Republicans are running scared. What happened to their so-called mandate?"


The Democrats are an obvious adversary against the Republican wrecking-ball political agenda.

The Trump administration, less obvious an adversary, but all the more formidable. The Dems. could not have:

According to Axios, most of her congressional staff have resigned, and she has already given up her slot on the House Intelligence Committee.
 
485102241_638451205757789_2444070742282233451_n.jpg


Kenneth Kirk

oSnrtepsdom4h10a:P4 20uh 51igh9c0Ma2751i1c a 9h999la9cr34tuM ·

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum responded to Trump’s threats with a backhand:

“So, you voted to build a wall.

Well, dear Americans, even if geography isn’t your strong suit—since you consider America a country rather than a continent—you should know that beyond that wall, there are 7 billion people.

And since the word 'people' might not resonate with you, let’s call them 'consumers.'

These 7 billion consumers can switch from iPhones to Samsung or Huawei in less than two days.

They can swap Levi’s for Zara or Massimo Dutti and, within six months, replace Ford and Chevrolet with Toyota, KIA, Mazda, Honda, Hyundai, Volvo, Subaru, Renault, or BMW—brands that often outperform in quality.

They can cancel Direct TV, and though they might not want to, they can stop watching Hollywood films in favour of higher-quality productions from Latin America or Europe, which offer richer narratives and better cinematography.

Believe it or not, people can skip Disney and instead visit the Xcaret resort in Cancun, or explore destinations in Mexico, Canada, South America, and Europe.

Even in Mexico, you’ll find better hamburgers than McDonald's, with superior nutritional value.

Have you ever seen pyramids in the U.S.?

Egypt, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, and Sudan all have ancient wonders—none of them in the U.S.

If they did, Trump would probably have bought and sold them by now.

We know that Nike isn’t the only sneaker brand—there’s Adidas, and even Mexican brands like Panam.

We understand the economy more than you think.

And we also know that if these 7 billion consumers stop buying American products, unemployment will rise, and your economy—trapped within its self-imposed wall—will crumble to the point where you'll beg us to tear it down.

We didn’t want to do this, but... You wanted a wall?

Well, you got one.”

Her approval ratings to historical levels, with one recent poll putting her support at 85 percent!
 
"Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum" #391
President of Mexico since 2024
Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo (born 24 June 1962) is a Mexican politician, scientist, and academic who is serving as the 66th president of Mexico since 1 October 2024, the first woman to hold the office. She previously served as Head of Government of Mexico City from 2018 to 2023.

A scientist by profession, Sheinbaum received her Doctor of Philosophy in energy engineering from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). She has co-authored over 100 articles and two books on energy, the environment, and sustainable development. She contributed to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and, in 2018, was named one of BBC's 100 Women. More from Wikipedia


" responded to Trump’s threats with a backhand:

“So, you voted to build a wall.
Well, dear Americans, even if geography isn’t your strong suit—since you consider America a country rather than a continent—" #391
Thank you Madame President.


"And since the word 'people' might not resonate with you, let’s call them 'consumers.'" #391
(y) This gal reads Trump like a dime novel.


"Her approval ratings to historical levels, with one recent poll putting her support at 85 percent!" #391
Make that 86%.
 
"Countries that have issued a travel advisory this year warning their citizens about visiting the United States" #392
I'm curious about the wording, the content, the detail of the "advisory".


This illustrates the monumental ignorance of Trump & cohort.
Their actions corroborate the foundation: I (we) don't know what this does, so it must not be important. It is a fundamental mistake to elect any presidential candidate whose plan-A for minimum presidential adequacy is O.J.T.
Four years is not long enough to cram that much education into one ignorant egotist. Trump was born in '46. If he hadn't learned these fundamentals by age 77 it's unrealistic to believe the education will be complete before 2029.

Yes, Trump offered some vague, perfunctory assurance to these disaster victims. But Trump is an ignorant liar.
And such hollow assurance is a Republican tradition. President Bush (younger) extended similar empty assurances to the New Orleans victims of hurricanes Rita and Katrina.

"Conservatives aren't supposed to be particularly nice. They're supposed to be competent. That's why you excuse their other attributes. And ...[hurricane] Katrina seemed to indicate they weren't competent either." George Will commenting on government's inadequate disaster response in Louisiana
 
487128684_1211535773669986_5406785654013155367_n.jpg


House Speaker Mike Johnson comes out swinging, folks! He says, "Now that conservatives are back in power, we're gonna turn the economy around!" And boy, did they ever—except they flipped a bitch so hard the whole damn economy went flying through the windshield. These geniuses managed to wipe out over 6 trillion dollars in stock market value quicker than Trump can bankrupt a casino!

Think about that number for a second—6 trillion! That's not pocket change, folks; that's enough cash to buy Twitter, Tesla, and probably still have enough left over to bail Rudy Giuliani out of jail. And speaking of geniuses, how about Trump's brilliant tariffs? They're raising the cost of living faster than the cholesterol levels at a MAGA rally barbecue. Now basic necessities cost so much, your weekly grocery run feels like a hostage negotiation.

I bet MAGA conservatives didn't realize that by "turning the economy around," they meant driving it straight off a cliff. Who knew these "fiscal conservatives" could crash the economy faster than the Trump FAA crashes planes? Hell, at this point, the only thing these people seem capable of stimulating is the unemployment line.

But hey, maybe they'll sell red hats emblazoned with "Make Bankruptcy Great Again!" At least that’ll keep the merch tables humming while everything else goes down in flames.
 

Trump says he ‘couldn’t care less’ if auto prices rise because of tariffs STORY #396

Corroborated on FOX News Sunday.

FNS250330a.JPG

"$6 Trillion wiped out in two months" #397
It looks bad.
Governor Reagan beat President Carter in the 1980 election during Carter's hideous $economic botch, including double digit interest rates, etc.
And though Reagan's economic remedy was not without pain, the U.S. economy as Reagan's advisors predicted did eventually enable economic prosperity.

Thus it's ignorant to assert that any economic adversity is detrimental.
In Trump's case however, that's the most plausible explanation.
"We know that protectionism makes the world poorer." George Will
 
Corroborated on FOX News Sunday.

View attachment 1318
More likely they're not going to buy that new car (or at least put off purchasing one for a few years). The used car market will do extremely well and so will auto repair shops (after all, have to keep that car running for another couple of years don't we) but the auto manufacturers aren't going to do as well.
 
"... but the auto manufacturers aren't going to do as well." S2 #399
"I couldn't care less ... because people are going to start buying American-made cars." Trump
Your overall conclusion in #399 seems consistent with prior examples S2.
Such change creates winners & losers. I'll be hanging on to my old paint for foreseeable future.

For one thing: many if not most new cars have shark-fin antenna. Reportedly this means they're hackable.
That's lunacy.
Bad enough that government overseers allow this, though it gives police advantage in apprehending fleeing felons.
But it's a potential life-ender for victims of hacking pranksters.
Pranks may be a joy. It's a ridiculous cause to die for in a flesh-mangling machinery pile-up.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

"I couldn't care less ... because people are going to start buying American-made cars." Trump
Is this what Trump voters really wanted?
 
Back
Top