What to call this thread?

Bigots that discriminate against dark-skinned persons may find exercising their malice simplified.
Bigots that would wish to discriminate against Muslims, or Jews, or Polish, or ... potentially more complicated.
"I guess if you can't tell, then there is no problem?" R5 #1,399
"No problem", until the bigot learns the truth ...

Therein lies an important lesson about bigotry.
 
"Big ruling out of Connecticut. A federal judge has ruled that blanket denials for FFS violate the affordable care act.
Though it only applies to two plaintiffs, class certification is pending, and it will provide strong legal rationale for challenges." S2 #1,401
hmmm
 
Bigots that discriminate against dark-skinned persons may find exercising their malice simplified.
Bigots that would wish to discriminate against Muslims, or Jews, or Polish, or ... potentially more complicated.

"No problem", until the bigot learns the truth ...

Therein lies an important lesson about bigotry.

A solution for rest rooms would be to just make many single person ones.
But the fact it does not bother me is not really fair to what women may feel?
 
Cost aside, that's fine in new buildings but retrofitting existing buildings is a another matter.

I am not sure, but it seems to me that most rest rooms are long and shallow, so would mostly just require the outer wall having lots of doors added, with partitions to the existing stalls?
I think I would leave out the urinals entirely?
Each new room could have its own sink, there could be a room with just sinks, or the sinks could be in the hallway?
 
"A solution for rest rooms would be to just make many single person ones." R5 #1,404
S2 #1,405 beat me to it. I suspect the cost, per "seat" would increase.
Another problem, when the porcelain appliances are outnumbered, there's a waiting line.
W/ individual doors, which door ...
"A solution for rest rooms would be to just make many single person ones." R5 #1,404
"I think I would leave out the urinals entirely?" R5 #1,406
Just like a man !
Women don't like sitting on a wet seat.

"But the fact it does not bother me is not really fair to what women may feel?" R5 #1,404
Maybe you're not doing it right. Next time try feeling them a little harder. ;)

"Each new room could have its own sink, there could be a room with just sinks, or the sinks could be in the hallway?" R5
Ever pee in a sink before?
“If women are so bloody good at multi-tasking, why can't they have sex when they have a headache?” Scottish comedian Billy Connolly
 
The mental gymnastics required to find someone to blame ....

649229030_1511973257605374_2211373429761842757_n.jpg
 
S2 #1,405 beat me to it. I suspect the cost, per "seat" would increase.
Another problem, when the porcelain appliances are outnumbered, there's a waiting line.
W/ individual doors, which door ...

Just like a man !
Women don't like sitting on a wet seat.


Maybe you're not doing it right. Next time try feeling them a little harder. ;)


Ever pee in a sink before?

I think in restrooms they have the seat on a spring so that it is normally up and had to be held down to sit on?

I have seen people pee in sinks, but only when there hundreds waiting, like at a concert.
I would not have the nerve.
 
"I would not have the nerve." R5 #1,409
Willingness to do so is inversely proportional to bladder capacity.

Once the emergency reaches "condition yellow", you either lighten the load, or enjoy the rest of the game in wet trousers.
 
Willingness to do so is inversely proportional to bladder capacity.

Once the emergency reaches "condition yellow", you either lighten the load, or enjoy the rest of the game in wet trousers.

I actually only went to a few games in high school, and one professional baseball game.
 
Attendance record aside, I don't recall ever cueuing for porcelain.

BUT !

I read a report that in public accommodations, the stall nearest the door is the cleanest.
 
Attendance record aside, I don't recall ever cueuing for porcelain.

BUT !

I read a report that in public accommodations, the stall nearest the door is the cleanest.

I think the longest wait was at rock concerts.
They may not be a good judge of how many will attend, and under estimate the facilities needed?
 
The stadium I attended most was NYC's Madison Square Garden (MSG).
I saw a NY Rangers ice hockey game there.
On separate occasion, Evil Kinevil jumping school buses on a Harley.
Also Stevie Wonder, warming up the crowd for The Rolling Stones.

I remember the scalpers loitering at the entrance @MSG.
I don't recall any plumbing indoors.
 
For those who've asked what the Republican response was when I asked them to prove that I am transgender was, here it is. They admitted that the only way they are going to police bathrooms is based on profiling people's appearance and that they couldn't actually prove it. Also saying that the bill isn't about me when it would absolutely still apply to ban me from bathrooms and locker rooms.


Note - the sound is messed up - I had to open the volume control and hold it - every time I released it the video muted
 
650816731_929827613342095_5423781295004513992_n.jpg



I see John James dropped by a local school board meeting the other day to spew more nonsense and lies about schools and LGBTQ issues.

Please understand that when people make trans folks an "issue" in education and political discussions their goal is to insinuate that anyone who is not cisgender is to be feared, ostracized, and not trusted with your child, or students, or around other adults.

It's a stealth campaign of slurs and "dirty tricks," and says a whole lot more about the persons making the argument than it does about the supposed targets of their ire.

Let’s talk some facts for a change.

About 1.6 million adults and children identify as transgender in the United States, or 0.6% of those ages 13 and older, representing less than one percent of the population.

Now, let's put ourselves in the shoes of a trans student in a public school. We're talking about kids who are doing what all of us do at their age and developmental stage: trying to figure out who we are, and how we want to “be” in the world.

Struggling with establishing an identity—how we want to see ourselves, and how we want others to see us. And in so doing, as they work through a dizzying array of questions and challenges, some of those children and their families may seek medical guidance, or see a social worker or family counselor.

Social conservatives want to make that impossible—to be clear, they want to deny health care to persons who need it.

And let’s talk about trans students playing sports…

If you think kids benefit from playing sports...that it "builds character", and "healthy habits", and "discipline", and "time management", and "learning to work with others"...

...then wouldn't we want ALL children to be able to participate in athletics?

And if your concerns are about "safety issues", and "competitive advantage", then shouldn't you also be demanding height and weight and speed limits in scholastic sports for all athletes?

Or insisting that all teams institute "no cut" policies, or having multiple teams for sports with a plethora of kids wanting to participate, so any kid who wants to play a sport has that opportunity?

Let's not even bother with the fact that only 2 trans kids played a sport in Michigan in the fall of 2025 (both in cross country), and none in the winter or spring seasons.

None.

In addition to the fact that there's little chance of a cross country runner injuring another runner--many cross country teams also have coed practices, and lots of cross country squads accept any kid who wants to participate.

Because these trans bans have nothing to do with safety issues or competitive advantage problems.

It's all about targeting a tiny number of children who are already dealing with more challenges in their lives than most of us will ever encounter, and are only looking for a way to fit in, and be part of something bigger than themselves. And to have a little fun with their friends by playing a sport.

They aren’t lurking in bathrooms hoping to get a glimpse of some other child’s body parts.

It's about manufacturing fear, and anger, and rage by demonizing schoolchildren.

And what about parents of trans kids who support their children's desire to play a sport? Don't they have "parental rights"? Or are those rights only reserved for parents who want to deny "other" kids from having access to school athletics?

What's next?

Limiting who can participate in band, or chorus, or orchestra classes?

How about restricting the right to take an AP course based on a child's sex or gender?

Where does this all end?

We need serious people talking about serious issues. Enough with the distractions and deflections--all of our children deserve to be treated with dignity, compassion, and care.

And *all* means *all*.

SOURCE
 
Back
Top