What to call this thread?

It's a practical application of reductio ad absurdum, following a proposition to its logical extreme to test its validity.
If there was not one single example of any artificial deviation from an Olympic competitor being a competitive advantage, the argument would be moot.

As R5 #1,296 suggests, the Pistorius case may be such an example, though it does not necessarily bear directly on the trans issue.


It may help settle rivalries, solidify resentments among contestants.

NASCAR was reportedly born of Prohibition, the Constitution's 18th Amendment.
The idea was to have an automobile fast enough to deliver moonshine from distillery to customer, with the ability to outrun the "revenuers", government agents enforcing Prohibition law.

But drunken rednecks arm-wrestling at the neighborhood bar is different from nation States participating in international competition.


This can happen when winning becomes a higher priority than the competition itself, an explanation for why 12 year old Soviet gymnasts had to shave their beards before competition.


You've reminded me of Kevin Costner's Waterworld.

You may be right R5. I suspect it's more likely to be the more obvious braggadocio of the self-impressed, not content merely to believe themselves superior, but to demonstrate it.

And those "12 year old Soviet gymnasts had to shave their beards before competition" are the females.
 
Actually those shots by ICE at moving vehicles like Renee Good, are illegal since they could easily have hit innocent bystanders.
The DOJ's policy says not to shoot at moving vehicles but not just because of innocent bystanders (that would be the case even if they were shooting at someone standing still)

1769606848790.png
 
SPIKED: The Education Department announced it has determined San Jose State University violated Title IX due to its handling of transgender former volleyball player Blaire Fleming.

The department said the university "caused significant harm to female athletes" by allowing Fleming to compete on the team, and it now has 10 days to comply with a series of agreements or risk "imminent enforcement action."

1769631081132.png

 
1769709859853.png


A former Republican lawmaker who repeatedly claimed that trans healthcare “harms kids” has been sentenced to 17 years in federal prison for child sexual abuse material offenses.

The man, Robert John “R.J.” May III, served in the South Carolina House of Representatives and built part of his political profile around opposing LGBTQ+ rights, drag performances, and gender-affirming care — often framing his rhetoric as a fight to “protect children.”

In federal court, May pleaded guilty to charges involving the distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). A judge sentenced him to 210 months (17.5 years) in prison, citing the seriousness of the crimes.

The case has drawn widespread attention because of the stark contrast between May’s public statements and his criminal actions, reigniting debate over hypocrisy, political rhetoric, and who actually poses harm to children.
 
Back
Top