The Second Term of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States of America

We've always known that Vance is a buffoon - this just provides additional proof

JD Vance branded 'buffoon' for dismissing Trump family financial claims​

Vice President JD Vance is facing a wave of online ridicule after brushing off claims that Donald Trump and his family have cashed in on the presidency. In an interview with 2WAY’s Mark Halperin, Vance called the idea “laughable” and argued the Trumps were already extremely wealthy before politics came into the picture. He added that the family had paid a heavy financial and personal price for Trump’s time in office.

The comments landed awkwardly given Forbes’ latest numbers. The magazine puts Trump’s net worth at around $7 billion, roughly $2.7 billion more than when he won the 2024 election. In 2025 his fortune hit a record $7.3 billion, well above the previous peak of $4.5 billion in 2015.

CONTINUED
 
"Trump family financial claims" #4,201
Perhaps less so now, but I've long suspected DJT's "wealth" was a Potemkin village of leveraged baloney.
Mayor Rudy Giuliani said of Trump:
"The man's a genius."

Late night TV comedy host Stephen Colbert replied:
"Yes. Only a genius could lose a $Billion $dollars running a casino."
Trump is a narcissistic self-impressed bumbling incompetent.

Whether or not President Trump's personal $wealth acquired while in presidential office violates the Constitution's emoluments clause is a matter for our Constitutional scholars to resolve.
At very least, there is the appearance, if not the fact of impropriety.


Potemkin village
n.
Something that appears elaborate and impressive but in actual fact lacks substance: "the Potemkin village of this country's borrowed prosperity" (Lewis H. Lapham).
[After Grigori Aleksandrovich Potemkin, who is said to have had elaborate fake villages constructed for Catherine the Great's tours of Ukraine and Crimea.]
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition copyright ©2022 by HarperCollins Publishers. All rights reserved.
 

Justice Department IG refuses to investigate botched Reflecting Pool case after Trump’s false vandalism claims​

Attorneys for David Hearn have asked the inspector general’s office to reconsider, citing “numerous potential crimes” in DOJ’s handling of the case.
Lawyers for former Olympic canoeist David Hearn, left, including Norm Eisen, right, allege prosecutors had evidence in their possession that Hearn did not cause “any harm or monetary loss” by touching the pool. Mark Schiefelbein / AP

Oct. 21, 2026, 11:43 AM GMT-5 By Ryan J. Reilly and Dareh Gregorian
The Justice Department’s inspector general is refusing to investigate what went wrong with the botched criminal case against former Olympic canoeist David Hearn over damage at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, including whether there was any criminality on prosecutors’ parts, Hearn’s legal team said.
In a letter Wednesday to Inspector General Don R. Berthiaume, Hearn’s attorneys asked his office to reconsider its decision because of evidence of “numerous potential criminal violations — possible crimes committed solely by DOJ personnel, as well as crimes committed jointly by DOJ” employees and personnel from the Department of Interior.

Trump had blamed the damage at the pool on Hearn and other “vandals.” U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro’s office moved to dismiss the case at the end of July, saying it had found the damage was “the result of flawed installation by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings.”
A judge later tossed the case and barred the government from trying to charge Hearn again.
 

Trump supporters confronted with painful gas prices deliver striking response: ‘I'll take that any day’​

Voters at the North Carolina event backed the president's stance that the ongoing war with Iran is a 'small price to pay'​

By Ireland Owens , Charles Creitz , Kiera McDonald Fox News Published October 21, 2026 2:18pm EDT
 
"Guess they didn't differentiate between positive and negative actions and results." S2 #4,213
Neither does Time magazine. Hitler was "man of the year" there.

"The Man of the Century" JMoI "10/22/26" #4,213
The 21st century is only 1/4 over.
Generations will be born, complete their lives, & die before the next century begins.
This "award" (euphemism for butt-smooch) is at best premature.
Obvious example: there are over 70 years left in this "century".
Elon Musk, reportedly the solar-system's first $Trillionaire, is about 56 years old.

So the actual one that "has made more for humanity" may not yet have been conceived, parent's not yet met, perhaps not yet adults.

BUT !
That's a trivial quibble in context of a more objective consideration of the merit of such Trump award.
 
"Neither does Time magazine. Hitler was "man of the year" there." s #4,215
"Stalin was Man of the Year twice in 1929 and 1942" S2 #4,216
Hitler's name is synonymous w/ "bad guy".
The name Hitler is invoked in Godwin's law *. BUT !
That's because Hitler killed people.
However, Stalin, a U.S. ally in WWII reportedly killed more humans than Hitler. :oops:

* Godwin's Law:
A term that originated on Usenet, Godwin's Law states that as an online argument grows longer and more heated, it becomes increasingly likely that somebody will bring up Adolf Hitler or the Nazis. When such an event occurs, the person guilty of invoking Godwin's Law has effectively forfeited the argument.
 
1792838996904.png

Stephen Hubbard, a retired American teacher held in Russia since 2022, was released on Wednesday. The same day, President Donald Trump brought up his case at a campaign rally in South Carolina while describing his diplomatic efforts, then returned to a grievance he has voiced before: the awards he says he was denied.

Trump again complained about missing out on the Nobel Peace Prize, and this time he added a second honor to the list. "But I didn't get the Nobel Prize. I didn't get the Pulitzer. I should have gotten the Pulitzer for writing, too. The people that got it shouldn't have gotten it, you know? They got a Pulitzer Prize for their accurate and wonderful writing on the subject of Russia, Russia, Russia," he said, before adding: "But they had it wrong. They all had it wrong."

His reference to Russia may be connected to his ongoing lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board. In 2022, the board stood by its decision to give the 2018 national reporting prize to The New York Times and The Washington Post for their coverage of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Trump's name appears on several books, but many were written with professional authors. Co-author Tony Schwartz said in a 2016 New Yorker article that he wrote most of "The Art of the Deal," Trump's 1987 breakthrough, with little input from Trump.

Schwartz, a longtime critic, said earlier this year: "Reality has no meaning to him. Reality is what he makes it in that moment. And in some measure, he believes it. The problem for him right now is most people don’t.”

Trump’s remarks drew quick reaction online. One person wrote: "Now this barely literate imbecile thinks he deserves a Pulitzer." Another commenter on X said: "At this rate, the only prize he's winning is the participation trophy for Most Delusional Man Alive."

It remains unclear what writing Trump has published in the past year that he believes deserves a Pulitzer.

SOURCE with comments

1792839206703.png

And just in case you thought the only DEI hires were Don Jr, Eric, and Ivanka:
1792839573138.png
 
Back
Top