Shiftless2
Well-known member
How do you conclude that masks and social distancing increased the death toll?.... Biden endorsed the social distancing and masks with covid, which greatly increased the death toll.
How do you conclude that masks and social distancing increased the death toll?.... Biden endorsed the social distancing and masks with covid, which greatly increased the death toll.
So you have previously explained."Except I think that is not true.
First of all, half of the Ukrainians are ethnic Russian and have repeatedly voted to stay as part of Russia." R5 #3,560
But instead Putin has chosen to drag the carnage out for years."Russia could easily have defeated the Ukraine in a week." R5 #3,560
Seems more like fantasy than reality."Russia could easily have defeated the Ukraine in a week." R5 #3,560
"All Putin had to do was to attack the civilian infrastructure like water, fuel, and electricity, like we did to Iraq in Shock and Awe.
Russia never did that." R5 #3,560
For search syntax I entered:"I have never seen any country being treated as delicately as Russia is treating the Ukraine." R5 #3,560

How do you conclude that masks and social distancing increased the death toll?
So you have previously explained.
But your alternate version represents a very small minority view.
It does not explain the sacrifice made by those in the combat zones.
But instead Putin has chosen to drag the carnage out for years.
If that's the case then mass murder is a Putin priority higher than territorial conquest.
Putin is a monster, no doubt. But you present him as even worse than he seems to be.
Russian rate of losses in Ukraine almost triples in one year
Seems more like fantasy than reality.
Putin could end this in a week, but year after year refuses to do so?
- piffle -
IAEA brokers localised Ukraine ceasefire to allow nuclear plant repairs
Concerns over the safety of the Zaporizhzhia plant, Europe’s largest, have been rife throughout Russia’s war on Ukraine.
By Al Jazeera Staff, AFP and Reuters / Published On 5 Jun 2026
For search syntax I entered:
Russia atrocity Ukraine *
The first page was full of different sources. The following is the link at the top of that list.
![]()
Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine triggered a humanitarian crisis
Russian authorities are desperate to evade justice for the crimes they’ve committed in Ukraine. We won’t let them.www.amnesty.org
Your continued portrayal of Russia as victim of Ukraine is so slim a minority view, I doubt it's common even in Russia.
And your portrayal of Putin as some sort of ethical champion is laughable.
Recently I encountered a report of Russia inducting mercenaries, often from impoverished nations in Africa.
And as is common with mercenaries, their employer is using them as fodder, marching them into the meat-grinder.
It's horrific. BUT !
Nice shade of lipstick you've slapped on it.
* Instead of continuing to sing the Putin melody, provide yourself some constructive insight. Try these two search syntaxes separately.
- Russia atrocity Ukraine
&
- Ukraine atrocity Russia
or whatever other syntax you think will reveal disclosures supporting your view.
"Russia could easily have defeated the Ukraine in a week." R5 #3,560
Because no such deprivation has occurred in the intervening years?"And clearly it is good that Putin did not try to end the war quickly, since that would have meant depriving the civilians of utilities and food." R5 #3567

Think you can quote any reputable news source that asserts this? I can't name any."Russia could easily have defeated the Ukraine in a week." R5 #3,560
You really have gone down the anti-vaccine rabbit hole (or at least the anti-mRNA one)And the mRNA seems to have been incredibly bad since those who took the mRNA shot seem to lose immunity and get covid multiple times.
Because no such deprivation has occurred in the intervening years?
How many human beings have lost their lives in this flagrant display of Ukrainian aggression which Putin could have won in a week?
View attachment 5627
Think you can quote any reputable news source that asserts this? I can't name any.
You really have gone down the anti-vaccine rabbit hole (or at least the anti-mRNA one)
mRNA vaccines "prevented immunity"? That's a new one - but if you believe that you're going to have to produce a peer reviewed article in a legitimate scientific or medical journal that concludes that.