What about what Trump has done / is doing do they find acceptable? Talkin' bad about the Fed Chair?
The world is on fire, and we are the arsonists. And 41% or OK with that.
The Second Term of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States of America
- Thread starter sear
- Start date
What about what Trump has done / is doing do they find acceptable? Talkin' bad about the Fed Chair?
The world is on fire, and we are the arsonists. And 41% or OK with that.
What about what Trump has done / is doing do they find acceptable? Talkin' bad about the Fed Chair?
The world is on fire, and we are the arsonists. And 41% or OK with that.
{...
In the RCP Average, Trump’s approval rating hovered around 43% during his first term and currently stands at 46.9%.
Stacking this up against other presidents, he doesn’t fare too well. The only president with approval below Trump’s at this point in his presidency was Trump himself during his first term, at 38%. Bill Clinton’s approval rating in June 1993 was also close, at just 41%. Richard Nixon, in the middle of the June 1973 Senate hearings related to Watergate, and after top aides H.R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman had resigned, exceeded the approval of both Clinton and Trump, at 44%.
The tendency for most presidents is to have a generally high job approval at the start of their term, which then declines as they face their first major setbacks or controversies. Biden’s approval in June 2021 was 56% in the Gallup poll and around 53% in the RCP Average, but it dropped to 45.3% after the Afghanistan withdrawal, which was enveloped in chaos and resulted in the deaths of 13 U.S. service members.
A 40% approval rating is approximately 30 points below the ratings of some of the most popular presidents. Of the presidents that Gallup measured, John F. Kennedy led the pack at 73% in June of 1961, followed by George H.W. Bush in 1989 at 70% approval, and Lyndon Johnson in 1965 at 67%.
...}
How Trump’s Approval Stacks Up Against Past Presidents
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Bad enough when he thought that he’s King of America. Now he thinks he’s King of the World.
Anyone else beginning to think that Trump's goal is to start WWIII?
Anyone else beginning to think that Trump's goal is to start WWIII?
Shiftless2
Well-known member
'Baby got himself a bruise': DHS faces scrutiny over ICE agent 'internal bleeding' claim
Story by David EdwardsDepartment of Homeland Security officials faced calls to produce medical records after claiming to multiple media outlets that Jonathan Ross, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer who shot Renee Good, was suffering from internal bleeding.
According to CBS News, DHS officials did not respond to requests for additional information about Ross' condition.
"The most common type of visible internal bleeding is a bruise," the Cleveland Clinic's website advises. "A bruise is skin discoloration from damaged, leaking blood vessels underneath your skin. Even though ....
MORE (including vid)
======================================================
From the article:
Shiftless2
Well-known member
The Suicide Pact: What Happens the Moment We Touch Greenland…
Why is invade Greenland not the same as Venezuela?
I did not write this. It was written by Brent Molnar. This sounds bad, very bad.
If the United States follows through on the threat to invade Greenland, we need to be crystal clear about what happens the next morning. This is not a real estate transaction or a routine military exercise. It is the geopolitical equivalent of pulling the pin on a grenade in a crowded elevator. The moment American boots hit the ground in Nuuk to seize territory from a fellow NATO member, the world as we know it ends. The consequences will not be temporary sanctions or angry letters. They will be total, permanent, and devastating.
The first domino to fall is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization itself. NATO is built on the sacred promise of Article 5, that an attack on one is an attack on all. If the U.S. attacks Denmark, we are not just breaking the treaty; we are triggering it against ourselves. NATO dissolves instantly. The alliance that kept the peace in Europe for 75 years evaporates, leaving the continent to rearm and realign against the new aggressor across the Atlantic. We don't just lose an ally; we create a unified enemy.
The military repercussions will be swift and humiliating. Europe will immediately ....
MORE>
=======================================================
All that followed by civil war - I'm sure Putin is laughing his ass off
Unmistakably so.
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Since I am somewhat sympathetic to Russia, it sort of seems an insult to Russia to call Trump a "Russian asset".
While on the surface it would seem to Russia's advantage to break up NATO as Trump risks doing, the reality is that NATO has never been the good guys, and instead participated in the toppling of over half a dozen popular Mideast leaders like in Bosnia, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Syria, the Ukraine, etc.
I suspect NATO is actually just a US asset, so will bow to the will of Trump in the long run.
Last edited:
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Your choice, but please don't conflate your tolerance for Trump's anti-Americanism with Trump patriotism.
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel: Samuel Johnson April 7, 1775
The Trump administration excluded Zelenskyy from participating in the formulation. Judging by the terms of the formulation the terms were apparently written by Russia, likely within the Kremlin.
Those terms included amnesty for Russian war atrocities, etc.
Essentially Putin handed the terms off to Trump, and Trump passed it along to Zelenskyy.
That's not the only example, but example enough. President Trump is a Russian puppet.
Fine.
What does Thune have to say about it?
McConnell raises a didactic point here.
Since McConnell's observation seems to be history based, it suggests Trump wants something other than what Greenland already seems willing to share. What else could that be, other than ownership?
Trump has caught Putin fever? Putin gets Ukraine, and Trump gets Greenland?
Thanks Mitch.