The Second Term of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States of America

"Did anyone watch Trump's speech (or even part of it)?" S2 #420
No.

"As Trump spun his globetrotting list of economic enemies, from Vietnam to Taiwan to the European Union, he declared this moment “Liberation Day.” Liberation Day!?! He actually said that years from now, we’ll all look back on this press conference as the day we got “so rich, so fast.” You know who else promises riches if you just believe hard enough? Cult leaders." #420
At risk of stating the obvious, Trump presides over the U.S. as he does over his own litigious, confrontational, treacherous, self-indulgent life.

Important Note:
Trump dominates our news cycles with his presidential shenanigans.
Persons of sense may grow fatigued with the unending gush of childish presidential mess-making.
This doesn't diminish the alarm that appropriately results.

But we dis-serve the world if we overlook the resultant displacement.
For example, our (former) friend and ally Germany is engaged in debate about how to respond to automation displacing human employment.
The U.S. faces the same consequences of technological progress. BUT !!
Trump so ruthlessly dominates our headlines, these other issues of society and governance are drowned out.

This does not mean their consequences will be any less consequential in the U.S. than they are elsewhere.
Instead it merely means Trump so destructively dominates our media these other very important issues are essentially being ignored,
left to be addressed in the shadows, by special interests rather than national social conviction.
 
BTW, if you haven't figured out how Trump arrived at the "tariffs" he's claiming that other countries are putting on American goods it's actually a simple calculation. While it uses grade school arithmetic it's total nonsense:

.... the Trump administration used quite a simple calculation: the country’s trade deficit divided by its exports to the United States times 1/2. That’s it.

The calculation was first suggested by journalist James Surowiecki in a post on X and backed up by Wall Street analysts. The Trump administration later confirmed that was the calculation it used.

For example, America’s trade deficit with China in 2024 was $295.4 billion, and the United States imported $439.9 billion worth of Chinese goods. That means China’s trade surplus with the United States was 67% of the value of its exports — a value the Trump administration labeled as “tariff charged to USA.”


“While these new tariff measures have been framed as ‘reciprocal’ tariffs, it turns out the policy is actually one of surplus targeting,” noted Mike O’Rourke, chief marketing strategist at Jones Trading, in a note to investors Wednesday.

“There does not appear to have been any tariffs used in the calculation of the rate. The Trump administration is specifically targeting nations with large trade surpluses with the United States relative to their exports to the United States,” he added.

The simple calculation used by the Trump administration could have broad implications for countries America depends on for goods — and the global companies that supply them.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch ...

Stellantis to idle Windsor plant, layoff 900 workers in Michigan, Indiana

COO cites new tariffs as reason


 
People can't say they weren't warned - this is what they said they'd do before the election ....

===========================================================================

Montana Department Of Propaganda

tSrodpesno02rft3 90M7th6u70:7792i 922ilhpf3P270gaftf5A12 3 8 ·

Oh, this is some straight-up, unapologetic sabotage. And it’s not even subtle. The Trump administration just took a goddamn sledgehammer to Head Start, the program that’s been the last line of defense for low-income kids and families for decades. No warning, no preparation, just a ruthless purge of the very people who keep these programs running. Five regional offices shut down overnight—gone, like someone yanked the plug and walked away whistling.

These weren’t just offices; they were lifelines. Boston, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle—whole regions just wiped out. The Boston office, Region I, was serving Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. New York’s Region II managed New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Chicago’s Region V oversaw Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. San Francisco’s Region IX covered Arizona, California, Nevada, Hawaii, and the Pacific Territories. And Seattle’s Region X kept Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington afloat. This isn't just a blow; it's a full-scale gutting.

These aren’t just bureaucrats getting pink slips; they’re the people responsible for approving grants, ensuring compliance, training, and providing technical support. You know, the basic structural foundation that makes it possible for Head Start to do its job—feeding kids, educating kids, making sure low-income parents have even a sliver of stability. And they’ve been wiped out with all the grace and subtlety of a mob hit.

And for what? To save money? Bullshit. This is ideological bloodletting. Project 2025—yeah, the Heritage Foundation’s fever dream of rolling back every social safety net that ever dared to offer a lifeline to someone not born into wealth. They’re going after Head Start like it personally insulted their grandparents. It’s not about cost-cutting; it’s about dismantling. Eliminate Head Start? Check. Slash funding for public education? Check. This is a scorched-earth policy against working families, and they're not even trying to hide it.
And they did this on the heels of a federal grant freeze that already had programs scrambling like hell just to stay operational. They set these places on fire and then turned around and asked why they didn’t build fireproof shelters. They threw everything into chaos and then acted shocked when kids are left without the education, health services, and nutrition support they need to survive.

The National Head Start Association is right to sound the alarm. These offices were the backbone of their ability to operate. You eliminate them, and you cripple the entire damn network. Programs across the country are suddenly left to flounder, with no guidance, no resources, and no help.
And who’s behind the wheel now? Elon Musk, the guy whose claim to fame is overpromising and underdelivering with the style of a con artist on a cocaine binge. He’s the one in charge of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—a title that sounds like it came from the fever dream of some tech-bro libertarian who thinks empathy is just a bug in the human operating system. They couldn’t have picked a more perfect avatar of clueless arrogance if they tried.

So, what’s the game plan here? Make life so impossibly hard for low-income families that they just vanish? Sweep them under the rug so the rich and comfortable don’t have to be reminded of their existence? Or is it just about freeing up funds for tax breaks for billionaires and stocking the Pentagon with golden toilet seats? Because it sure as hell isn’t about making things better for anybody who actually needs help.

This isn’t incompetence. It’s cruelty. It’s deliberate, targeted cruelty. And it's the kids who pay the price—kids who were already dealt a rough hand, now having their only hope for a better life systematically stripped away. The Trump administration is turning these communities into collateral damage for a psychotic ideological experiment.
They aren’t just cutting offices; they’re cutting throats. And they’re doing it with the kind of smug detachment only the ultra-wealthy can afford. This is a deliberate effort to sabotage Head Start from the inside out, and if Congress doesn’t get its act together and stop it, we’re going to see entire generations of children left out in the cold.

Emphasis added
 
"Fox News removes their Dow ticker as stocks crater from Trump's new tariffs" #423

"Very interesting ...." S2
(y)

Some accustomed to message board interactions may be exposed directly to the MAGA mindset.
If memory serves, they're rather zombie-like, impervious to reason, Kool-aid lobotomized.

This suppression of news by FOX conclusively settles any question about "fair & balanced". This may not mean we should ignore FOX. But we must be mindful to consider the source: Keep your friends close, your enemies even closer. Sun Tzu, also author of The Art Of War, 6th century BCE Chinese general and military strategist


Meanwhile, back on Earth:

Fortune

Are Trump’s tariffs as bad as the Smoot-Hawley Act, which is blamed for deepening the Great Depression? They’re actually worse​

Shawn Tully / Thu, April 3, 2025 at 3:07 PM EDT

Few economists can find good things to say about the infamous 1930s tariffs.
It's Smoot-Hawley all over again! At least by this reporter's calculations, the sweeping tariff regime that President Trump unveiled following the market close on April 2 literally lifts America's duties on imports to roughly the same level that the much-reviled legislation took them to at the start of the Great Depression.

The ultraprotectionist Smoot-Hawley Act is widely blamed for deepening and prolonging the worst chapter in U.S. economic history. In a 1993 debate with independent presidential candidate Ross Perot on Larry King Live, then VP and free-trade advocate Al Gore brought an antique picture of the two senators, mocking them for a disastrous policy prescription that "sounded reasonable at the time." Indeed, for the general public and a wide swath of trade experts, going the Smoot-Hawley route is the economic equivalent of shooting yourself in the foot.

The Trump announcement contained two big surprises. The first: The tariffs are much higher and more extensive than investors and businesses had expected, based on the President's ever-changing, and at times relatively dovish, musings in the previous days and weeks.
Second, the "retaliatory" tariffs were generally gigantic and bore no relation to the posted numerical duties the targeted nations impose on the U.S. For example, the EU slaps an average rate of 2.7% on our goods, according to the World Trade Organization.
Yet Trump is piling across-the-board tariffs of 20% on the 27-nation bloc.

How the Trump tariffs compare to Smoot-Hawley

In June of 1930, just eight months after the historic stock market crash that marked the start of the Great Depression, Congress enacted the Smoot-Hawley tariff law, championed by Senator Reed Smoot (R-Utah) and Representative Willis Hawley (R-Ore.). The nation had already turned toward protectionism, chiefly to protect farmers and industrial workers, eight years earlier when the Fordney-McCumber bill raised tariffs substantially, from the single digits to an average of 13.5%, where they stayed pre-Smoot-Hawley. The new law, designed to double down on shielding agricultural workers and folks toiling in the likes of steel and auto plants, raised imposed duties to over 50% on many products. Still, around two-thirds of U.S. imports remained tariff-free, so the average rate rose much less, by 6.3 points to just under 20%.

That's slightly below the 22% or 23% I get for the Trump plan. And that's stunning in itself. But the most astounding takeaway is that the Trump blueprint would raise today's tariffs from the current 3% by nearly 20 points, or sevenfold! That's three times the jump under Smoot-Hawley.

In the three years following the enactment of Smoot-Hawley, U.S. imports dropped by two-thirds, and, pounded by stiff retaliation from nations such as Germany, the U.K., and Canada, our sales abroad fell by a like percentage.

 

Occupy Democrats

dopsSnroet4hi3hi33u71g112g1cauggc72f3059590f624f91ut6328hg26 ·

https://www.facebook.com/#
BREAKING: Canada's new Prime Minister Mark Carney hits back hard against Donald Trump's apocalyptic new tariffs and officially announces the end of America's "global economic leadership," calling it a "tragedy."

The Trump Dark Age is upon us...

"The global economy is fundamentally different today than it was yesterday," said Carney. "The system of global trade anchored on the United States that Canada has relied on since the end of the second World War — a system that while not perfect, has helped to deliver prosperity for our country for decades — is over."

It's worth noting that Carney is a trained economist and former central banker. He understands the long term effects of these tariffs far better than Trump, who apparently doesn't understand them at all.

"Our old relationship of steadily deepening integration with the United States is over," Carney continued. "The eighty year period when the United States embraced the mantle of global economic leadership, when it forged alliances rooted in trust and mutual respect, and championed the free and open exchange of goods and services is over."

"While this is a tragedy, it is also the new reality," he went on. "We must respond with both purpose and force. We are a free, sovereign, and ambitious country. We are masters in our home."

Carney also stated that Canada will be matching Trump's 25% tariff on vehicles imported into the United States, meaning that prices are going to skyrocket even further.

"We take these measures reluctantly. And we take them in ways that is intended and will cause maximum impact in the United States and minimum impact in Canada," Carney explained.

Trump promised our country a Golden Age. When this is all said and done, we'll be lucky if we have a country at all.
 
As America enters the Golden Age of Stupid ....

1743794799152.png

Sean Prpick

Sotpsrndeo5lufgfhi27700m1hm2mauaa8926c045lt047106h1cu57f93h8 ·

Donald Trump has pushed America into a golden age of stupid. Now's Canada's chance to be smart

April 3, 2025, by Bruce Arthur, Columnist, Toronto Star

You ever tried to reason with a dog? It’s not easy. You can explain that the dog is doing the wrong thing; you can show the dog charts and graphs.

Odds are, though, the dog will just keep on being a dumb ol' dog.

In related news, on Wednesday Donald Trump tried to crash the global economy with tariffs. It is hard to grasp just how historically, world-alteringly stupid this is.

“There has certainly been no piece of trade policy in my lifetime that is at this level of stupidity, right?” said Rob Gillezeau, an assistant professor of economic analysis and policy at the University of Toronto. “It's not grounded in anything intelligent. Like, they're kind of just like ignoring economics altogether.”

“I think I can obviously come up with things that have happened in other countries (that are dumber),” says Joseph Steinberg, an assistant professor of economics at the U of T who specializes in international economics, including trade.

“I mean, you know, the policy trajectory that North Korea chose after the Korean War.”

He also mentioned Argentina’s self-inflicted economic crisis in the late 1800s that caused that nation to stagnate for more than 100 years.

I struggle to think of anything worse,” says Kevin Milligan, the director of the school of economics at the University of British Columbia.

Oh, it’s read-the-entrails dumb, but let’s try to spell it out: The White House announced tariffs because Trump thinks a trade deficit is a subsidy, which is like saying that if you buy a wheelbarrow from Home Hardware, you are subsidizing Home Hardware.

Trump said the Great Depression never would have happened if the U.S. had stuck with tariff-based policy, though the Smoot-Hawley tariffs famously helped worsen the Great Depression.

“People have made comparisons to the Smoot-Hawley tariffs, which were also bad, but this tariff jump is higher, and the U.S. is three times as trade exposed now as they were in 1932,” says Milligan.

“We have lots of bad economic policy in the world, but we've never seen anything this amateur or purposely destructive at the national level from a G7 economy,” says Gillezeau.

“I that there are pretty reasonable odds they cast themselves into another Great Depression, right?”

Basically, if Brexit was a form of economic suicide, Trump’s tariffs are more of a semi-random murder-suicide.

Trump’s functionaries appear to have copied and pasted a list of tariff targets from the CIA Factbook, which is how you wind up applying tariffs to an uninhabited island near

Antarctica populated by penguins, French territories which export small amounts of lobster and which are now tariffed at 99 per cent, and an island which only houses a U.K. and U.S. military base.

They appear to have calculated the tariffs by taking each nation’s trade deficit and dividing it by the nation’s exports to the United States, which isn’t how anything works.

When this was pointed out, a White House deputy press secretary disputed that and offered a mathematical formula that had only added two Greek letters to a formula that, uh, divided the trade deficit by exports to the United States.

The markets dove, inflation is predicted to spike, global currencies gained against the U.S. dollar — including the Canadian dollar — and recession risk is rising fast. It’s exactly what you would expect if you handed the world’s biggest economy to the most dim-witted cranks on Earth.

And it might be a glimpse of Canada's best hope.

Some prominent Canadians seemed to think that since Canada wasn’t given additional tariffs Wednesday, the tariff threat has passed and the talk of annexation is over.

This is remarkably vapid naiveté.

Canada’s position remains terribly precarious, jammed between Russia and this version of the United States.

What these tariffs do show is the blunt-force stupidity and madness of Trump and MAGA could help Canada.

It’s also what makes matters so precarious, of course: Trump could send the military into Canada on a whim, for instance, without an appropriate fear of international condemnation, or of the Canadian resistance involved.

But Trump's sheer backwards overreach offers an opening.

Tariffs against the world — with the exception of Russia, North Korea, Cuba and Belarus — give other nations added incentive to build trade networks with non-American markets, Canada hopefully included.

The popular resistance to the effects of this black hole of gawping idiocy should also slow Trump: as Milligan notes, one byproduct of tariffs on Southeastern Asian countries will be higher prices for clothing and shoes, which will especially impact lower-income Americans.

If Trump stays the course, a blinkered American public might actually realize what’s happening.

“After the Smoot-Hawley tariffs were enacted, the political parties that were in power and implemented those changes essentially lost power in the United States for an entire generation afterwards,” says Steinberg.

“It does present an opportunity for the rest of the world to do something different.”

That’s what Canada needs, all right.

The United States is in its golden age of stupid.

Now's our chance to be smart.
 

Wait... I thought.... what?!


QpoGaqM.png


Someone slap me but I thought Trump was in power and not Kamala.

From the news I've been reading the US is already walking the path of an economic depression...

Biden is still going to get blamed for this... just watch
 
Back
Top