Quotable Quotes

Rep. Dan Sullivan on Putin: ~ "A dictator, an authoritarian, a mafia regime leader."....

Trump in response: ~ "I have to make deals with people, so I don't go around calling them names... I don't go around mocking people. You know, part of the reason you have [the Iran war] in the first place is Biden went around mocking Russia and mocking everybody else and didn't know what he was doing."....

 
Rigby5 said:
"I do not mind adding on a ballroom that much, but ..." R5 #2,325
Click to expand...
There are numerous problems.
- Trump began construction before the "public", in this case a euphemism for $taxpayer, was made aware Trump's design doesn't even meet fire code.
- Trump told a variety of lies about it.
> Trump said the new construction would not interfere with the pre-existing white house
> the project would not cost the U.S. $taxpayer, the project would be fully funded by private donations
> it would not disrupt the DC skyline
Rigby5 said:
"... destroying any building wing that old is really uncalled for." R5 #2,325
Click to expand...
This raises question about whether this is about Trump self-aggrandizement, or the exercise of power, with absolute impunity.

Trump does not "own" the white house. It's U.S. government housing. Trump is a (hopefully temporary) tenant.
When I was a U.S. military member (President Trump is "commander in chief") the UCMJ prohibited destruction of government property.

Why don't we offer Trump the choice:
- either complete your FINAL presidential term in Leavenworth, OR
- entirely from Trump's own personal funding replace the now demolished East wing with an identical duplicate.

Enjoy your stay in Leavenworth Mr. President.
 
sear said:
Why don't we offer Trump the choice:
- either complete your FINAL presidential term in Leavenworth, OR
- entirely from Trump's own personal funding replace the now demolished East wing with an identical duplicate.
Click to expand...
The Supreme Court gave him an unlimited "get out of jail" card when they ruled that anything that he does in his official capacity is legal. (He actually tried to use that as a defense in the Stormy Daniels case - claimed that he'd mentioned it to some aide in the White House so that made it part of his official duties.)
 
Shiftless2 said:
The Supreme Court gave him an unlimited "get out of jail" card when they ruled that anything that he does in his official capacity is legal. (He actually tried to use that as a defense in the Stormy Daniels case - claimed that he'd mentioned it to some aide in the White House so that made it part of his official duties.)
Click to expand...

While I agree crimes can not be part of his "official capacity", I did not see anything illegal about the Stormy Daniels hush money.
The most controversial part is that I think he then wrote it off as a business expense.
And actually I tend to think that was legal as well?
It is things like Venezuela, fast boats, Iran, ICE not using judicial due process, etc., that is criminal.
 
Shiftless2 said:
"The Supreme Court gave him an unlimited "get out of jail" card when they ruled that anything that he does in his official capacity is legal. (He actually tried to use that as a defense in the Stormy Daniels case - claimed that he'd mentioned it to some aide in the White House so that made it part of his official duties.)" S2 #2,327
Click to expand...
Rigby5 said:
"While I agree crimes can not be part of his "official capacity"" R5 #2,329
Click to expand...
At the hands of the U.S. voters (and the electoral college) the U.S. careens out of control.

Trump has debilitated the U.S. military by shocking reductions among senior U.S. military leadership. For what benefit?
Trump has the authority to so as commander in chief: United States Constitution Art.2 Sect.2.1

What Constitutional enumeration grants the president the authority to demolish an irreplaceable national landmark like the white house East wing?

There's more to "anything that he does in his official capacity" than any crime the president perpetrates during his own tenure.
It is a cliché that no one is above the law.

President Trump has much to answer for.

261019PBSNH02sp.JPG

sickening
 
sear said:
Trump has debilitated the U.S. military by shocking reductions among senior U.S. military leadership. For what benefit?
Click to expand...
Those members of the military that he fired weren't doing their job (said job being prostrating themselves in front of Trump and doing exactly what he wants). [end sarcasm]
 
I like reductions in the US military, and would like to see it return mostly to a volunteer militia.
The only thing we need permanent military for is high tech stuff that requires special training, or the training requirements themselves.
We should not have any offshore military bases in my opinion.
 
Rigby5 said:
"I like reductions in the US military" R5 #2,332
Click to expand...
Some persons are overweight. Losing 10 pounds might seem a benefit. BUT !
Decapitation is not usually the preferred protocol.

Whether the U.S. military should undergo headcount reduction is a matter that should be considered with the following understanding:
There's no more extravagant waste than a 2nd rate military. Gen. Horner
Click to expand...
For the U.S. to maintain its sovereignty, it needs a U.S. military powerful enough to maintain its U.S. sovereignty.
A military less capable than that is a potentially terminal risk.

But the U.S. military population is not homogeneous.
There are enlisted, non-commissioned, and commissioned officers.

The cuts Secretary Hegseth has made do not appear to have taken specialty / skill into consideration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top