Photos, vids, etc ....

I considered putting this in the LBGT thread as well

293365105855013fc2bd005056a9545d
 
Shiftless2 said:
"Happy Birthday, Ma'am!" "90 Wow!" #2,842
Click to expand...
They had closets back then too.

pro·noun (prōnoun′)
n. Abbr. pron. or pr.
1. The part of speech that substitutes for nouns or noun phrases and designates persons or things asked for, previously specified, or understood from the context.
2. Any of the words within this part of speech, such as he or whom.
[Late Middle English pronoun, pronoune, partial translation of Latin prōnōmen (translation of Greek antōnumiā, interchange of names, pronoun) : prō-, pro- + nōmen, name, noun.] *

ad·jec·tive (ăjĭk-tĭv)
n. Abbr. a. or adj.
1. The part of speech that modifies a noun or other substantive by limiting, qualifying, or specifying and distinguished in English morphologically by one of several suffixes, such as -able, -ous, -er, and -est, or syntactically by position directly preceding a noun or nominal phrase.
2. Any of the words belonging to this part of speech, such as white in the phrase a white house.
adj.
1. Adjectival: an adjective clause.
2. Law Specifying the processes by which rights are enforced, as opposed to the establishing of such rights; remedial: adjective law.
3. Not standing alone; derivative or dependent.
[Middle English, from Old French adjectif, from Late Latin adiectīvus, from adiectus, past participle of adicere, to add to : ad-, ad- + iacere, to throw; see yē- in the Appendix of Indo-European roots.]
adjec·tive·ly adv. *

adjective pronoun
n.
A pronoun acting as an adjective, such as which in which dictionaries? *

* The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition copyright ©2022 by HarperCollins Publishers. All rights reserved.
 
Rigby5 said:
"Except that the Ukraine never had their own drones, so those are US drones piloted by US soldiers." R5 #2,852
Click to expand...
Multiple reports over the years detail a David vs Goliath character to Ukraine's defense against its Russian aggressors / occupiers.
Recently such reports included disclosures of simple contributions Ukrainian citizens are making to the War effort.
For example, using a 3D printer to manufacture plastic nose-cones for Ukrainian drones.

No doubt Americans have direct involvement in assisting Ukrainian defense, including US Navy terrorism intelligence expert Malcolm Nance, one of many from the U.S. to help defend Ukraine.
 
sear said:
Multiple reports over the years detail a David vs Goliath character to Ukraine's defense against its Russian aggressors / occupiers.
Recently such reports included disclosures of simple contributions Ukrainian citizens are making to the War effort.
For example, using a 3D printer to manufacture plastic nose-cones for Ukrainian drones.

No doubt Americans have direct involvement in assisting Ukrainian defense, including US Navy terrorism intelligence expert Malcolm Nance, one of many from the U.S. to help defend Ukraine.
Click to expand...

The US is not "defending" the Ukraine at all, since all the Ukraine had to do in order to prevent this war, was not cut off all communications in 2022.
The pro-Russian government elected in 2012 had been kicked out in 2014, and that was when the Ukraine tried to block Russian use of Sevastopol.
So it was Zelensky deliberately forcing the war in 2022 that caused the actual war, 8 years later.
And I doubt Zelensky would have done that if not for the US pouring in billions worth of weapons from 2014 on.
 
Rigby5 said:
"I think Rand Paul was trying to do something sooner, but was not allowed." R5 #2,856
Click to expand...
And Senator Paul [R] is so devoted a partisan hack his fidelity to party overshadowed his other motives?
Senator Paul may be the least likely currently serving U.S. senator for that explanation.

Rigby5 said:
"The facts still are that Fauci funded the Wuhan research, and that research was done in Wuhan because it was illegal in the US." R5 #2,856
Click to expand...
Even if we presume that to be true, is that what Republicans are threatening Fauci with?
Is whatever they're threatening appropriate for an esteemed world-class doctor / epidemiologist involved in international research?

Is it possible Fauci's antagonists are simply trying to cover up their own manifold inadequacies for having been out of the loop?
Why are U.S. and China's scientists not cooperating more effectively on such research? The answer to that, punish Fauci ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top