HEADLINES: 2026

"So it seems Fauci is the fault of the covid being created." R5 #240
That's one seemingly plausible explanation. It doesn't seem consistent with Fauci's otherwise impeccable public health lifelong commitment.
If malice was Fauci's agenda, why did he not better leverage the AIDS pandemic?

#240 is not the only possible explanation, and it's not the Ockham's Razor / most likely explanation.

More plausible, IF Fauci had some involvement @Wuhan, that Fauci was wooed by China for nefarious Chinese benefit,
wherein China withheld the bio-warfare details, misleading Fauci to believe the research was therapy / benevolence based.

I haven't encountered any plausible reports of Fauci betraying the People of the United States, even if Trump has insinuated it.
I do not find Trump a particularly reliable witness, nor is Trump exceptionally well informed.
 
That's one seemingly plausible explanation. It doesn't seem consistent with Fauci's otherwise impeccable public health lifelong commitment.
If malice was Fauci's agenda, why did he not better leverage the AIDS pandemic?

#240 is not the only possible explanation, and it's not the Ockham's Razor / most likely explanation.

More plausible, IF Fauci had some involvement @Wuhan, that Fauci was wooed by China for nefarious Chinese benefit,
wherein China withheld the bio-warfare details, misleading Fauci to believe the research was therapy / benevolence based.

I haven't encountered any plausible reports of Fauci betraying the People of the United States, even if Trump has insinuated it.
I do not find Trump a particularly reliable witness, nor is Trump exceptionally well informed.

There are only 2 possibilities for the "gain of function" research I can think of.
One would be for biological weapons purposes, and the other would be to try to anticipate what future epidemics might modify naturally?

But neither makes sense alone, since you would think either one of these motives would have started research first on a cure would have been fundamental to the program.

Which makes one wonder if the mRNA research had come first, and covid was created in order to test or sell the mRNA?
Since Pfizer and Moderna made over $60 billion off their mRNA vaccine that did not work, one has to be suspicious.
 
Which makes one wonder if the mRNA research had come first, and covid was created in order to test or sell the mRNA?
mRNA vaccines have been in the works for years. When COVID hit it was just a matter of identifying the virus to tailor the vaccine to it.

Since Pfizer and Moderna made over $60 billion off their mRNA vaccine that did not work, one has to be suspicious.
Only thing is, the vaccine did work.
 
mRNA vaccines have been in the works for years. When COVID hit it was just a matter of identifying the virus to tailor the vaccine to it.


Only thing is, the vaccine did work.

All mRNA does or can do is reprogram the ribosomes in our own cells to grow proteins.
The original point of mRNA was to cure protein deficiencies.
We do not know what bone marrow T-cells store for immunity epitopes.
So there is no way mRNA could ever work as a vaccine of any type.

Here is what the AMA says are the mRNA vaccines approved, and they all look like recent covid vaccines to me.
https://synapse.patsnap.com/article/how-many-fda-approved-mrna-are-there
And people still got covid after the mRNA covid vax.
 
"In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle,stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson

"All mRNA does or can do is reprogram the ribosomes in our own cells to grow proteins." R5 #244
I imagine you're aware your tenacious contradiction of mainstream immunology not only contradicts the scientists, but also the science.

Nope, not sure why, BUT !!
Is there a distinction being overlooked here?

Is mRNA vaccine a vaccine that is composed of mRNA ? - or -
Is mRNA vaccine a vaccine manufactured using mRNA chemistry to pharmaceutically reproduce the vaccine?

"And people still got covid after the mRNA covid vax." R5 #244
It's a vaccine, not a cure.
And the manufacturers are generally candid about efficacy. Some vaccines provide more protection than others.
 
"In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle,stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson


I imagine you're aware your tenacious contradiction of mainstream immunology not only contradicts the scientists, but also the science.

Nope, not sure why, BUT !!
Is there a distinction being overlooked here?

Is mRNA vaccine a vaccine that is composed of mRNA ? - or -
Is mRNA vaccine a vaccine manufactured using mRNA chemistry to pharmaceutically reproduce the vaccine?


It's a vaccine, not a cure.
And the manufacturers are generally candid about efficacy. Some vaccines provide more protection than others.

Not sure I see your point?
All medical sources pretty much agree the mRNA vaccine was a bust and did not stop infection spread among those vaccinated.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/ar...u-from-getting-covid#does-it-prevent-covid-19

{...
The COVID-19 vaccine does not prevent COVID-19. A person who is fully vaccinated can still contract the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, and may go on to develop the disease.
...}

Since the whole point of a vaccine is to prevent infection, that means it did not work.

When people claim that it reduced the hospital death rate, that is a deliberate deception.
It is true that for 2 months after an mRNA inoculation, that a person's immune system will be highly active and reduce severity of any infection.
However that is not a vaccine that prevents infection, but a treatment to reduce severity instead.
And the way that worked is that all the cells effected by the mRNA were detected as rogue by the immune system, and needing to be destroyed.
So the mRNA shot made the immune system go into overdrive for 2 months, killing our own cells that had been reprogrammed to grow spike proteins.

To answer your question, the mRNA vaccine is just composed of mRNA.
The mRNA are instruction to the ribosomes of our cells, to start growing spike proteins.
It is then our own cells with these spike proteins, that then are supposed to act as the actual vaccine.
The intent was that by making out own cells grow spike proteins, that we would familiarize our immune system to any pathogen with the same spike proteins.

The problem with this is that our own exosomes (which are the means the body uses to communicate with our cells, like telling them to multiply to heal a wound) also have the exact same spike protein. The only difference is our exosomes only have one, while covid had hundreds.
In fact, there are some who guess that covid used to be an exosome that mutated out of control and became cancerous.
So spike proteins can never be used to identify a pathogen.
Meaning mRNA could never possibly work.

If you want to read the opinions of Dr. Robert Malone, the first person to successfully use mRNA technology, here is a link:
https://www.malone.news/p/when-is-mrna-not-really-mrna
 
No vaccine is 100% effective - that's why herd immunity is important.

And those who did contract COVID generally had less severe symptoms.

The mRNA was 0% effective.
And in fact it seems to have made people susceptible to getting covid over 4 times.

It did reduce symptoms for 2 months, but that is just because it put the immune system on high alert due to all the cells it mangled by making them grow spike proteins.

The mRNA caused lots of amputations and deaths from blood clots, since any human cell it reached had to be destroyed by the immune system.
 
Back
Top