HEADLINES: 2026

"While an impressive feat to make the batteries light enough " R5 #196
"Looks to me like they changed batteries, which seems a little like cheating?" R5 #199
a) indeed, but
b) Technically what constitutes "cheating"? A violation of the rules. &
c) We are at the ["lawless"] frontier stage of this technology. The reason it's not as easy to identify cheating among robots as it is among humans is, there are rules for humans. Less so if any for robots. What rule says a runner can't switch batteries mid-race?

1776772990364.png

Not uncommon for marathon runners to snatch an open cup of liquid refreshment to drink, somewhere along the 26 mile course.
Robots don't drink.

"the ice is to cool the batteries" S2 #200

"There are many who hold that things break about even in life for all of us.
I have observed for example that we all get the same amount of ice.
The rich who get it in the Summertime, the poor who get it in the Winter." attributed to Mat Basterson Bat Masterson
 
a) indeed, but
b) Technically what constitutes "cheating"? A violation of the rules. &
c) We are at the ["lawless"] frontier stage of this technology. The reason it's not as easy to identify cheating among robots as it is among humans is, there are rules for humans. Less so if any for robots. What rule says a runner can't switch batteries mid-race?

View attachment 4731

Not uncommon for marathon runners to snatch an open cup of liquid refreshment to drink, somewhere along the 26 mile course.
Robots don't drink.



"There are many who hold that things break about even in life for all of us.
I have observed for example that we all get the same amount of ice.
The rich who get it in the Summertime, the poor who get it in the Winter." attributed to Mat Basterson Bat Masterson

It also appeared to me that the guy had to hold onto the robot in order to stop it from falling backward once it had stopped?
 
April 22
THE IDEA FOR THE FIRST EARTH DAY

Senator Gaylord Nelson recruited Denis Hayes, a young activist, to organize the campus teach-ins and to scale the idea to a broader public, and they choose April 22, [1969?]

Happy Earth Day
&

"It also appeared to me that the guy had to hold onto the robot in order to stop it from falling backward once it had stopped?" R5 #202
Me too.
So the robot runs better than it stands.

Difficult to know from that small sample precisely what the problem is:
- poor vision
- inadequate software
- inadequate gravitation sensor

Long term, trivial.
 
""The Human Race"
it's over.
We lost." #195

and

A robot is beating human pros at table tennis. Its maker calls it a milestone for machines​

A paddle-wielding robot is so adept at playing table tennis that it is posing a tough challenge to elite human players and sometimes defeating them, according to a new study that shows how advances in artificial intelligence are making robots more agile.
Published 10:04 AM GMT-5, April 22, 2026
 
and

A robot is beating human pros at table tennis. Its maker calls it a milestone for machines​

A paddle-wielding robot is so adept at playing table tennis that it is posing a tough challenge to elite human players and sometimes defeating them, according to a new study that shows how advances in artificial intelligence are making robots more agile.
Published 10:04 AM GMT-5, April 22, 2026

That is quite an accomplishment, since it requires such rapid visual object recognition, as well as the calculations to predict trajectories.
But a failure in ping pong has no risks involved.
I would never trust the computer to do something like drive on a street, when a mistake could kill people.
 
"I would never trust the computer to do something like drive on a street, when a mistake could kill people." R5 #206
Too late.

I agree, the humanless automobiles already navigating public roadways have been released to the task prematurely. BUT !!

I believe a combination of automated airliner controls, and substantially upgraded ground-based radio infrastructure could reduce risk under adverse landing conditions.
 
Too late.

I agree, the humanless automobiles already navigating public roadways have been released to the task prematurely. BUT !!

I believe a combination of automated airliner controls, and substantially upgraded ground-based radio infrastructure could reduce risk under adverse landing conditions.

Yes I agree flying an airplane is so much more routine that it could be done entirely by computer.
I was just reading about a plane crash on take off, where the crew simply forgot to set the flaps and slats.
That not only was really dumb, but something a computer could have prevented.
I am not sure, but I think current bad weather landings are already done by the ground control?
But they can afford the best systems and daily maintenance at airports.
I don't think cars will ever be up to those same standards?
 
Yes I agree flying an airplane is so much more routine that it could be done entirely by computer.
I was just reading about a plane crash on take off, where the crew simply forgot to set the flaps and slats.
That not only was really dumb, but something a computer could have prevented.
I am not sure, but I think current bad weather landings are already done by the ground control?
But they can afford the best systems and daily maintenance at airports.
I don't think cars will ever be up to those same standards?

I'm an inveterate if not an invertebrate fence straddler.
There's no denying the obvious appeal of ideological simplicity.

But in practice, pure systems don't seem to do very well.
Laissez-faire stock markets are but one example. Seems simple. But without protection from insider trading, the average investor would be chronically victimized, cheated.

Regarding commercial airliner piloting it's dangerous to half-step, and automate some systems but not others.
I'm not familiar with the example you've cited, but wouldn't be surprised if the cockpit crew responsible had experience with an aircraft that automated that configuration.

I'm not advocating against hands-off automated night landings under extremely limited visibility conditions due to example fog or snow.
But pilots maintain proficiency with practice, exercise, repetition.

We've already lost passengers & crew to such lapses.
 
Just in case you wondered if his brain worm was still alive. It is and it's eating well. .....

1777147767287.png

BREAKING: RFK Jr. just told U.S. senators he still thinks flu shots can cause autism — and watching America’s Health Secretary repeat debunked garbage in 2026 feels like being governed by a YouTube comment section in a suit.

At a Senate hearing on Trump’s health budget, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was asked a very simple question.

Can you say, clearly, that routine vaccines like the flu shot do NOT cause autism?

Instead of answering like a grown‑up in charge of the nation’s health agencies, he danced, dodged, and dragged us all back into a fake “debate” that real scientists settled years ago.

He leaned on the same old talking points.

He claimed he’s “not anti‑vaccine, just pro‑safety.”

He insisted there are “studies out there” that suggest vaccines and autism might be linked.

He tried to make it sound like the science is split and he’s the brave truth‑teller in the middle.

It’s nonsense.

Decades of research, millions of children, and mountains of data all say ....

CONTINUED
 
I'm an inveterate if not an invertebrate fence straddler.
There's no denying the obvious appeal of ideological simplicity.

But in practice, pure systems don't seem to do very well.
Laissez-faire stock markets are but one example. Seems simple. But without protection from insider trading, the average investor would be chronically victimized, cheated.

Regarding commercial airliner piloting it's dangerous to half-step, and automate some systems but not others.
I'm not familiar with the example you've cited, but wouldn't be surprised if the cockpit crew responsible had experience with an aircraft that automated that configuration.

I'm not advocating against hands-off automated night landings under extremely limited visibility conditions due to example fog or snow.
But pilots maintain proficiency with practice, exercise, repetition.

We've already lost passengers & crew to such lapses.

{...
WAYNE COUNTY, Mich. – It’s been 38 years since Northwest Airlines Flight 255 crashed onto I-94, killing all but one passenger.

The aircraft took off from Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, and was airborne for all of 14 seconds before the crash along Middlebelt Road and I-94.

Flight 255 is the seventh deadliest plane crash in United States history, and is the deadliest aviation disaster to have a sole survivor.

Here is a look back at this Southeast Michigan tragedy.

Flight 255 crew and flight preparation

Captain John R. Maus, a 57-year-old from Las Vegas, and First Officer David J. Dodds, a 35-year-old from Galena, Illinois, picked up their aircraft, a McDonnell Douglas MD-82, that had just finished a leg with stops in Minneapolis and Saginaw, and prepared for their flight to Phoenix. About 10 minutes before the flight was due to depart the gate, a company transportation agent brought the flight release package to the airplane.
The takeoff performance data that was in the flight crew’s package was based on using either runway 21L or 21R. However, the flight had been instructed by ground control to taxi to runway 3C.

Runway 3C was the shortest of the three available runways. Captain Maus asked his first officer to verify that they could use runway 3C for takeoff. First Officer Dodds had to refer to the company’s Runway Takeoff Weight Chart Manual.

Their takeoff weight had to be below the allowable limits for runway 3C. The chart showed that if the flaps were set to 11 degrees, the maximum allowable takeoff weights for runway 3C was 147,500 pounds. The final takeoff weight for Flight 255’s airplane was 144,047. Basically, all of this technical mumbo jumbo just means that as long as the pilots set their flaps to 11 degrees, their plane would safely get off the ground even with their high takeoff weight and short runway.

While the plane was taxiing, the pilots got a little lost on their way to the runway. After missing a turn, the pilots contacted ground control who then redirected them back to runway 3C. At 8:44 p.m., Flight 255 was cleared for takeoff.

The plane crash

Recordings in the cockpit indicate that the engine power began increasing immediately after the all-clear for takeoff. However, the recording also revealed that the flight crew had trouble engaging the auto-throttle system at first, but did engage the system moments later. First Officer Dodds called “rotate” at 8:45 and a second later, the stall warning stick shaker activated and continued operating until the recording ended.

According to the crash report, all of these issues in the takeoff ultimately contributed to the overall system failure. The auto-throttle system failing to engage was the first red flag, with the stall warning being the second.

Witnesses of Flight 255 agreed that the takeoff roll was longer than what is normal in similar airplane takeoffs. The witnesses also stated that the flight rotation began about 1,200-1,500 feet from the end of the runway and that the tail of the aircraft came close to striking the runway.
...}
 
Just in case you wondered if his brain worm was still alive. It is and it's eating well. .....

View attachment 4780

BREAKING: RFK Jr. just told U.S. senators he still thinks flu shots can cause autism — and watching America’s Health Secretary repeat debunked garbage in 2026 feels like being governed by a YouTube comment section in a suit.

At a Senate hearing on Trump’s health budget, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was asked a very simple question.

Can you say, clearly, that routine vaccines like the flu shot do NOT cause autism?

Instead of answering like a grown‑up in charge of the nation’s health agencies, he danced, dodged, and dragged us all back into a fake “debate” that real scientists settled years ago.

He leaned on the same old talking points.

He claimed he’s “not anti‑vaccine, just pro‑safety.”

He insisted there are “studies out there” that suggest vaccines and autism might be linked.

He tried to make it sound like the science is split and he’s the brave truth‑teller in the middle.

It’s nonsense.

Decades of research, millions of children, and mountains of data all say ....

CONTINUED

Sorry, but I totally disagree.
No one should ever get a flu shot.
First of all they almost never work since the actual flu that season is almost never the one they guess for when they started making the vaccine 3 years before.
Second is that for vaccines to last, the immunity information has to be appended to the DNA of the bone marrow T-cells, and while the number of vaccine immunities that can be remembered is not clear, it is likely limited to less than a dozen.
So in no way should anyone be adding an additional immunity every year.

And clearly all shots used to contain thimerosal mercury, which most definitely does cause autism.
 
"Flight 255 crew and flight preparation
The plane crash"
R5 #212
We may share the lament about this tragedy.
I suspect from there we may diverge. Not clear to me what conclusion you draw from this.

Marge Inovera

"Sorry, but I totally disagree.
No one should ever get a flu shot." R5 #213
My position on this is deeply rooted in utilitarianism, greatest good for the greatest number.
I gather the scientific consensus on continents around the globe is based upon valid statistical compilations over decades / generations.

If they're right, I disagree with you.
If they're wrong, why the conspiracy? And how have they so successfully coordinated it?

This conspiracy theory explanation simply isn't plausible. It's too difficult to execute, with too little to gain.
And it's a slippery slope.
If we deny the efficacy of your category of pharmaceutical, shall we deny the efficacy of all? If so, how have so many pharmaceutical companies around the world become so powerful?
And why for example are persons with AIDS that would under other circumstances died long ago, still alive & well today?
 
We may share the lament about this tragedy.
I suspect from there we may diverge. Not clear to me what conclusion you draw from this.

Marge Inovera


My position on this is deeply rooted in utilitarianism, greatest good for the greatest number.
I gather the scientific consensus on continents around the globe is based upon valid statistical compilations over decades / generations.

If they're right, I disagree with you.
If they're wrong, why the conspiracy? And how have they so successfully coordinated it?

This conspiracy theory explanation simply isn't plausible. It's too difficult to execute, with too little to gain.
And it's a slippery slope.
If we deny the efficacy of your category of pharmaceutical, shall we deny the efficacy of all? If so, how have so many pharmaceutical companies around the world become so powerful?
And why for example are persons with AIDS that would under other circumstances died long ago, still alive & well today?


I do not have much proof, but annual vaccines really do not make much sense.
The place immunity is stored in with T-cells in the bone marrow.
These cells only have a life expectancy of about 12 years.
Yet many immunities, like for Polio, last more than 35 years.
That means the immune information has to be appended to the DNA and passed on to descendant T-cells.
But you can't do that for hundreds of immunities.
They have estimated only about a dozen immunities can be stored on the DNA of bone marrow T-cells.
Which means you need to carefully limit how many vaccinations you get.
And flu is the least fatal, so the least important.

As for those with something like AIDS, actually vaccinations are way too dangerous for them, and they instead should use antiretroviral therapy.
Basically, the idea is to temporarily block HIV reproduction and artificially stimulate production of appropriate antibodies.

Why is big-pharma pushing vaccinations so much?
Because they make over $100 billion a year off vaccinations.
There is nothing in the world nearly that lucrative.
 
"Why is big-pharma pushing vaccinations so much?
Because they make over $100 billion a year off vaccinations." R5 #215
Supply & demand.
Would "they" pay over $100 billion a year for placebo? And not know?
Patient outcomes would sound that alarm. Has it?

R5,
There are smart people at this including "doctors". There's more than one kind. This group includes the "take off your pants" kind.
The parity check, the patients.

For them ALL to be in on the same conspiracy simply is not plausible. Where's the whistle-blower?
Not ONE? No body other than you? Have you gone to The New York Times about this?
I'm not sure they'd bury an exposé regarding a $100 billion healthcare scam on page 2.

"There is nothing in the world nearly that lucrative." R5 #215
Google?
Except they don't jam a needle in your ...

update _________ 260426 _____________________________

Masked burglary crews terrorizing ritzy neighborhoods show ‘they’re doing their homework,’ veteran cop warns​

Former LAPD investigator says burglars are doing homework, tracking patterns and targeting affluent homeowners​

By Stepheny Price Fox News / Published April 25, 2026 8:00am EDT
A fast-moving burglary spree is unfolding across Los Angeles, with thieves targeting some of the city’s most affluent neighborhoods and striking multiple communities over the past week — even as police flood the area with patrols.
The latest incidents unfolded Wednesday night in the San Fernando Valley, where burglars hit homes in Studio City and Toluca Lake and targeted a commercial property in a separate theft that led to a police chase.
The violence escalated Thursday night when a woman in her 70s was strangled during a home invasion in the Hollywood Hills, according to the Los Angeles Police Department. The suspects, described as at least two masked men, fled with cash and jewelry and remain on the run.

note:
Anyone that's seen Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange might imagine what 2030 will bring if this police-eluding method is franchised across the continent.
 

Live updates: Gunman in custody after charging gala with Trump attending; motive unclear

The motive is still under investigation but “preliminary” findings indicate the suspect was targeting administration officials, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told NBC News.


==============================================
This is odd. This woman was seated next to Karoline Leaviit’s husband at the White House Correspondents Dinner. He leaned over to her and said, very seriously, “You need to be very safe.” And then the shooting started. She was explaining this on air to Fox News when she got cut off mid-sentence. It’s sus that her call got cut off RIGHT THEN. Because what she was implying was that it seemed that Karoline’s husband had advance notice of what was about to happen.

The Fox anchor made an excuse about the call getting dropped. NO, they protect Trump on Fox. Someone in the sound room cut the call off.

So this woman will get a severe talking to by men in black suits and told she mustn’t say such things. We will never hear about this from her ever again.

You can hear the call here:


==============================================

And there’s this*:

“My best friend and I went to the WHCD, and we ended up leaving early because something felt off. It started the second we got there. Every event we’ve ever been to, especially at this level, there are layers of security: bags checked, IDs checked, actual process. This time, nothing. We were just asked if we had tickets, [we] said yes, and got waved through, no bag check, no real screening, no line. Just thousands of people packed together, being pushed through the door as fast as possible. It felt wrong immediately. Like, viscerally wrong. My best friend literally turns to me and says “I think something is going to happen.”

“And then it did.

“This cannot happen. Not here, not at something like this.

“Praying for everyone, but there needs to be accountability because this should never happen again.”

*Original edited for punctuation. The original is here:


==============================================

Conspiracy theory? I'll leave it up to you.

1777208168248.png
 
“My best friend and I went to the WHCD, and we ended up leaving early because something felt off. It started the second we got there. Every event we’ve ever been to, especially at this level, there are layers of security: bags checked, IDs checked, actual process. This time, nothing. We were just asked if we had tickets, [we] said yes, and got waved through, no bag check, no real screening, no line. Just thousands of people packed together, being pushed through the door as fast as possible. It felt wrong immediately. Like, viscerally wrong. My best friend literally turns to me and says “I think something is going to happen.” S2 #217
How many plausible possible explanations are there for this?
- coincidence?
- incompetence?
- corruption?

Trump could be removed from office either by bullet, or the 25th Amendment.
VP Vance replaces him either way. Right?

So if this has been in any way a palace coup d'état attempt, why risk conspiracy to murder? Why not with this level of cooperation, instead invoke Amendment #25?

note:
It's early in this investigation.
It's perilous to assume each initial disclosure is fully accurate. ... wait until the dust settles.
 
Back
Top