Are these homicidal authoritarians still pretending to be, explicitly claiming to be "pro-life"?
Or have they at least, at long last admitted to being what they have been from the start, anti-choice?
HEADLINES: 2026
- Thread starter sear
- Start date
Or have they at least, at long last admitted to being what they have been from the start, anti-choice?
Shiftless2
Well-known member
If they really are pro-life why aren't they worried about guns in schools. making sure that school children have lunches, providing pre (and post) natal medical care, and .....
Shiftless2
Well-known member
This Kentucky Supreme Court ruling isn’t just about charter schools.
It’s about stopping lawmakers from using taxpayer money to eventually fund private religious schools while pretending they’re "public."
Church/state separation still matters.
www.friendlyatheist.com
https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/k...qdsPnLbgBU2ysUcXON_aem__I6f8vKFPJ_VP6cG0rim8Q
It’s about stopping lawmakers from using taxpayer money to eventually fund private religious schools while pretending they’re "public."
Church/state separation still matters.
Kentucky Supreme Court crushes charter school scheme to drain public education funding
The unanimous ruling affirmed taxpayer dollars must fund accountable public schools, not privatized alternatives backed by conservatives
www.friendlyatheist.com
Indeed."This Kentucky Supreme Court ruling isn’t just about charter schools.
It’s about stopping lawmakers from using taxpayer money to eventually fund private religious schools while pretending they’re "public."
Church/state separation still matters." S2 #83
So the separation of Church and State is a principle worth defending, UNLESS
it's the bigot's own prejudice that's being proselytized.
Shiftless2
Well-known member
The perils of messing with someone who is smarter than they are ....
BREAKING: As Hillary Clinton heads into a closed-door deposition related to the Epstein investigation, she released a pointed opening statement, making clear she knew nothing about Epstein and slamming the Republicans for not allowing her to testify in public.
Below is her full, unedited statement:
SECRETARY CLINTON'S OPENING STATEMENT
Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member, Members of the Committee... as a former Senator, I have respect for legislative oversight and I expect its exercise, as do the American people, to be principled and fearless in pursuit of truth and accountability.
As we all know, however, too often Congressional investigations are partisan political theater, which is an abdication of duty and an insult to the American people.
The Committee justified its subpoena to me based on its assumption that I have information regarding the investigations into the criminal activities of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Let me be as clear as I can. I do not.
As I stated in my sworn declaration on January 13, I had no idea about their criminal activities. I do not recall ever encountering Mr. Epstein. I never flew on his plane or visited his island, homes or offices. I have nothing to add to that.
Like every decent person, I have been horrified by what we have learned about their crimes. It's unfathomable that Mr. Epstein initially got a slap on the wrist in 2008, which allowed him to continue his predatory practices for another decade.
Mr. Chairman, your investigation is supposed to be assessing the federal government's handling of the investigations and prosecutions of Epstein and his crimes. You subpoenaed eight law enforcement officials, all of whom ran the Department of Justice or directed the FBI when Epstein's crimes were investigated and prosecuted. Of those eight, only one appeared before .....
MORE including comments
BREAKING: As Hillary Clinton heads into a closed-door deposition related to the Epstein investigation, she released a pointed opening statement, making clear she knew nothing about Epstein and slamming the Republicans for not allowing her to testify in public.
Below is her full, unedited statement:
SECRETARY CLINTON'S OPENING STATEMENT
Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member, Members of the Committee... as a former Senator, I have respect for legislative oversight and I expect its exercise, as do the American people, to be principled and fearless in pursuit of truth and accountability.
As we all know, however, too often Congressional investigations are partisan political theater, which is an abdication of duty and an insult to the American people.
The Committee justified its subpoena to me based on its assumption that I have information regarding the investigations into the criminal activities of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Let me be as clear as I can. I do not.
As I stated in my sworn declaration on January 13, I had no idea about their criminal activities. I do not recall ever encountering Mr. Epstein. I never flew on his plane or visited his island, homes or offices. I have nothing to add to that.
Like every decent person, I have been horrified by what we have learned about their crimes. It's unfathomable that Mr. Epstein initially got a slap on the wrist in 2008, which allowed him to continue his predatory practices for another decade.
Mr. Chairman, your investigation is supposed to be assessing the federal government's handling of the investigations and prosecutions of Epstein and his crimes. You subpoenaed eight law enforcement officials, all of whom ran the Department of Justice or directed the FBI when Epstein's crimes were investigated and prosecuted. Of those eight, only one appeared before .....
MORE including comments