Shiftless2
Well-known member
Don't they still have the right to demand ALL the evidence which includes the complete unredacted Epstein files?
HEADLINES: 2026
- Thread starter sear
- Start date
Seems to me their role as witnesses doesn't grant them the same supervisory control as those conducting the inquiry. BUT !!
If the release of Epstein files was not only court-ordered, but also deadlined (that compliance deadline now in the past, thus completion of the disclosure overdue),
then raising the point of order that their compliance is being demanded, yet the rule of law is not being followed.
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Waiting for MAGA heads to explode - it's going to be a glorious sight
Shiftless2
Well-known member
1,000 samples sent for testing after possible biological lab found inside Las Vegas home: FBI
The evidence has been transported to an FBI lab for testing, authorities said Monday.
abcnews.go.com
The property manager was arrested. They've got no idea yet what all was being worked on yet.
But...
"The owner of the property was arrested and charged in 2023 in connection with an investigation into an illegal bio lab in Reedley, California, authorities said. The owner, a Chinese national, remains in federal custody and has pleaded not guilty.
The case led to a congressional investigation that found the illegal bio lab had allegedly been receiving money from Chinese banks and was housing thousands of samples of potential pathogens labeled as being HIV, malaria, TB, COVID-19 and even Ebola.
The items found in the Las Vegas residence "were consistent in appearance with the items found and described in the Reedley, California, lab investigation," McMahill said Monday
"So, yeah, could we just, ya know, not?
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Judge refuses to toss The Satanic Temple's lawsuit, putting Boston's flag policy on trial
The city’s attempt to shut down the case has failed, which means allegations of religious favoritism and missing records are headed to the discovery phase
A federal judge won’t dismiss a lawsuit alleging religious discrimination by the city of Boston against The Satanic Temple. It means the case against the city will proceed despite all their attempts to have it tossed out. It’s a completely self-inflicted wound that the city could have handled years ago, but their refusal to handle the problem responsibly has led to endless litigation.
All of this stems back to when the city allowed groups to .....
Judge refuses to toss The Satanic Temple's lawsuit, putting Boston's flag policy on trial
The city’s attempt to shut down the case has failed, which means allegations of religious favoritism and missing records are headed to the discovery phase
www.friendlyatheist.com
More War Against Iran ?
Retired four-star Gen. Jack Keane said the U.S. should use military action against Iran while the regime is at its "weakest," arguing that Tehran continues to lie about its nuclear ambitions even as President Donald Trump keeps the door open to a new deal.
"I think we're coming down to the reality that the military option is, indeed, the best option here," Keane said on "Fox & Friends Weekend."
Trump faces "this historic opportunity that no other president has had" to set the conditions for regime collapse, which could herald enduring peace in the Middle East and be legacy-defining for the president, he said.
www.foxnews.com
Iran being armed with nuclear weapons seems undesirable to those seeking peace in the Middle East.
But is "the U.S. should use military action against Iran" the best alternative?
During this 2nd Trump administration the U.S. military has demonstrated itself superlatively proficient, both in its previous attack on Iran, and by removing Maduro from Venezuela.
Is Keane right?
If so, why the U.S. military? Is there a compelling reason a broader coalition including Iran's Middle East neighbors should not take the lead?
Retired four-star Gen. Jack Keane said the U.S. should use military action against Iran while the regime is at its "weakest," arguing that Tehran continues to lie about its nuclear ambitions even as President Donald Trump keeps the door open to a new deal.
"I think we're coming down to the reality that the military option is, indeed, the best option here," Keane said on "Fox & Friends Weekend."
Trump faces "this historic opportunity that no other president has had" to set the conditions for regime collapse, which could herald enduring peace in the Middle East and be legacy-defining for the president, he said.
Retired general argues military action against Iran is 'best option' as Trump faces 'historic opportunity'
Retired Gen. Jack Keane advocated for military action against Iran, saying Trump has a "historic opportunity" to achieve regime collapse and regional stability.
www.foxnews.com
Iran being armed with nuclear weapons seems undesirable to those seeking peace in the Middle East.
But is "the U.S. should use military action against Iran" the best alternative?
During this 2nd Trump administration the U.S. military has demonstrated itself superlatively proficient, both in its previous attack on Iran, and by removing Maduro from Venezuela.
Is Keane right?
If so, why the U.S. military? Is there a compelling reason a broader coalition including Iran's Middle East neighbors should not take the lead?
Shiftless2
Well-known member
This was major headlines but it's as important today as it was then
She waited sixteen years. Then she stood in a courtroom and asked one question that changed everything.
In the year 2000, a fifteen-year-old girl named Rachael Denhollander walked into a doctor's office in Michigan seeking help for chronic back pain. The physician she met was Larry Nassar, the national medical coordinator for USA Gymnastics and a trusted faculty member at Michigan State University. Parents across the country considered it a privilege to have their daughters treated by him. Coaches called him the best in the business.
What happened in that exam room would stay with Rachael for the next sixteen years.
Under the guise of medical treatment, Nassar sexually abused her. Her own mother was sitting in the room during the appointments, unable to see what was happening because Nassar had perfected how to position himself to obstruct her view. He had been doing this for years. He had fooled everyone — parents, coaches, university officials, Olympic committees. When Rachael left that office confused and violated, she had no idea she was one of hundreds.
The warning signs had been there for over two decades. As early as the late 1990s, young athletes had tried to report Nassar to coaches, trainers, and university officials. At least seven women or girls told someone before Rachael did. Every time, their voices were dismissed. Their concerns were ....
MORE>
Emphasis added
She waited sixteen years. Then she stood in a courtroom and asked one question that changed everything.
In the year 2000, a fifteen-year-old girl named Rachael Denhollander walked into a doctor's office in Michigan seeking help for chronic back pain. The physician she met was Larry Nassar, the national medical coordinator for USA Gymnastics and a trusted faculty member at Michigan State University. Parents across the country considered it a privilege to have their daughters treated by him. Coaches called him the best in the business.
What happened in that exam room would stay with Rachael for the next sixteen years.
Under the guise of medical treatment, Nassar sexually abused her. Her own mother was sitting in the room during the appointments, unable to see what was happening because Nassar had perfected how to position himself to obstruct her view. He had been doing this for years. He had fooled everyone — parents, coaches, university officials, Olympic committees. When Rachael left that office confused and violated, she had no idea she was one of hundreds.
The warning signs had been there for over two decades. As early as the late 1990s, young athletes had tried to report Nassar to coaches, trainers, and university officials. At least seven women or girls told someone before Rachael did. Every time, their voices were dismissed. Their concerns were ....
MORE>
Emphasis added