For my Canadian friends

Canadians will understand

1788308872817.png

Have say that, in days gone by, Tims made good donuts - of course that was in the days when donuts were all made locally in the back of every store. Since they've stopped that an just ship in frozen donuts from a central factory that's no longer the case.
 
Shiftless2 said:
Canadians will understand

View attachment 6254

Have say that, in days gone by, Tims made good donuts - of course that was in the days when donuts were all made locally in the back of every store. Since they've stopped that an just ship in frozen donuts from a central factory that's no longer the case.
Click to expand...

As far as I can see, JK Rowling is entitled to her own opinion.
She does not know the science, and can't extrapolate from her own experiences.
 
Rigby5 said:
As far as I can see, JK Rowling is entitled to her own opinion.
She does not know the science, and can't extrapolate from her own experiences.
Click to expand...
But she's using her money to lobby against equality. Fact is, she's actually threatened to bankrupt Amnesty International for opposing her.
 
Rigby5 said:
" JK Rowling is entitled to her own opinion." R5 #627
Click to expand...
True, but immaterial.
Her own opinion is not the issue. Opinion is state of mind. It's not a matter of thought. It's a matter of conduct.
Rowling seems to be committed to civil rights discrimination. That's a crime under the Constitution, including the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
 
But in Canada it's not known as "Canadian Bacon". That name is simply an American marketing ploy. And the stuff they sell in the US under that name is a poor imitation of the real thing.

1788451876731.png

Since you probably can't find it where you live you can make your own. It's not difficult - I bought my Prague Powder (sometimes called "pink salt" on Amazon - a comment, it's not salt so you cannot substitute the "pink salt" you find in gourmet stores and you can't put it on food).

You'll find a number of other recipes on line - the only difference being the spices that go in the marinade.

cookwhatyoulove.com

Peameal Bacon Recipe — Authentic Ontario-Style, Made at Home

Make peameal bacon at home with perfect seasoning and less salt, a simple, budget-friendly way to enjoy this Canadian favorite.
cookwhatyoulove.com cookwhatyoulove.com
 
Shiftless2 said:
"But in Canada it's not known as "Canadian Bacon". That name is simply an American marketing ploy." S2 #632
Click to expand...
Geoffrey took a cab from Zurich Airport to midtown Zurich. One of the first retail shops he found sold cheese.
Geoffrey had eaten swiss cheese in Peoria, and decided to try what Switzerland had to offer,
and ordered sliced swiss cheese.

The clerk shrugged:
"It's all Swiss. What kind would you like?"
Geoffrey ate at McDonald's.
 
First time I went to Switzerland (Zurich to be exact) I was under strict orders from my wife to bring back some real Swiss chocolate. I was there for a little over a week and everybody was asking me what I was going to do during my free time on the weekend - when I said that I was going to do some sightseeing but did want to buy some good chocolate the immediate response was "You've go to go to Sprungli" - after the fifth time I was told this I got the idea - I should probably go to Sprungli. Definitely did and walked out CHF 300 poorer (and it all fit in my briefcase for the flight home). On subsequent trips I discovered that they also had a store in the Zurich airport so I had no excuses for not stocking up before I came home.

spruengli.ch

Confiserie Sprüngli

Confiserie Sprüngli has stood for the finest haute chocolaterie for 190 years. Discover legendary Luxemburgerli, fine chocolate and exclusive gift ideas.
spruengli.ch spruengli.ch
 
Shiftless2 said:
But she's using her money to lobby against equality. Fact is, she's actually threatened to bankrupt Amnesty International for opposing her.
Click to expand...

I am not well versed in all the details, but what I have seen from JK Rowlings seemed reasonable to me.
She does not seem to me to be denying the existence of transgender, but instead is against them having an edge in sports.
And I think I agree that the need to know what pronouns to use without having any means of knowing what ones are desired, is untenable.
Anyway, here s Factuality on the matter:
{...
Executive summary

J.K. Rowling has taken a publicly prominent, consistently critical stance toward aspects of transgender rights and policy in the UK, framing her position as a defense of biological sex and women’s single‑sex spaces, while asserting respect for trans individuals’ right to live [1] [2]. Her statements since 2020—tweets, a long essay, blog posts, public endorsements, and financial support for groups opposing self‑ID and certain reforms—have been widely interpreted as oppositional to trans‑affirming policies, and have prompted sustained backlash from LGBTQ+ advocates and several Harry Potter cast members [3] [4].
AccurateInaccurate
1. How she frames the issue — A woman defending sex‑based rights or opposing gender identity claims?
Rowling publicly argues that “sex is real” and that recognizing gender identity in law and policy risks eroding protections for cisgender women and girls, particularly around single‑sex spaces and services. This framing appears in her essay and repeated social media posts where she ties concerns about self‑identification laws and related reforms to safety and legal clarity, and she has expressed willingness to refuse compelled use of trans‑preferred pronouns [1] [2]. Supporters of her phrasing present it as a principled defence of sex‑based rights and women’s safety; critics counter that her rhetoric negates trans identities and fuels discrimination, labeling the stance trans‑exclusionary or transphobic, which has amplified public debate and drawn condemnation from LGBTQ+ organisations [5] [6].
2. What she has done — Tweets, essays, legal support and funding that shaped the controversy
Since 2020 Rowling has used multiple platforms to amplify her views: a detailed essay explaining her rationale, frequent activity on social media, public support for the legal case of Maya Forstater, and reported financial backing for groups opposing trans‑inclusive reforms. These actions include praising court rulings that interpret “woman” in biological terms and supporting organisations such as For Women Scotland, which resist self‑ID proposals—steps that move beyond commentary into legal and civic intervention [3] [6]. Observers see this mix of rhetoric, legal advocacy, and philanthropy as a coordinated influence on the UK policy conversation; defenders argue it is legitimate civic participation grounded in research and personal experience [2] [5].
3. Who responded — Allies, critics, and the fractures in Rowling’s public coalition
The reaction to Rowling’s stance has been sharply divided. Prominent former collaborators and cast members like Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint publicly rejected her statements and expressed support for trans rights, while some figures such as Robbie Coltrane and Eddie Izzard have offered varying degrees of defence, illustrating a fractured public response tied to personal relationships and differing views on gender policy [4] [7]. LGBTQ+ organisations and activists have consistently condemned her positions as harmful to trans people and as contributing to a hostile climate; supporters emphasize her stated respect for individuals and argue critics conflate policy scepticism with hatred. These splits have had reputational consequences for Rowling and complicated cultural discourse around the Harry Potter brand [1] [7].
4. Policy impact and the courtroom — Did her stance influence law or rulings?
Rowling’s commentary intersected with contentious legal debates in the UK, including discussions of self‑identification, reforms to the Gender Recognition Act, and court rulings on the legal definition of “woman.” She celebrated rulings seen as aligning with a biological definition of sex and has used her platform to back organisations participating in legal challenges, which contributors interpret as an effort to shape outcomes via public pressure and funding [6] [3]. While it is difficult to quantify direct causal impact on legislation, her visibility elevated public scrutiny, mobilised both opponents and defenders of reform, and contributed to an intensified political and judicial spotlight on transgender rights in the UK [1] [8].
5. What the debate omits and the larger context readers should know
Coverage often reduces complex questions—medical pathways for gender‑diverse youth, single‑sex protections, free speech and compelled speech—to binary moral arguments; this obscures nuance about evidence, clinical guidelines, and lived experience. Analysts highlight Rowling’s stated concerns about detransition rates and young people, and her supporters say her perspective is rooted in charitable work and research, while critics point to her social media likes and associations with anti‑trans figures as evidence of an agenda [2] [8]. The conversation remains highly politicised: some actors and organisations amplify trans‑affirming protections as human rights imperatives, while others prioritise sex‑based legal clarity—both positions reflect distinct policy priorities that policymakers and courts continue to navigate amid sustained public controversy
...}

What is J. K. Rowling's stance on LGBTQ+ rights in the

Executive summary J.K. Rowling has taken a publicly prominent, consistently critical stance toward aspects of transgender rights and policy in the UK, fra...
factually.co factually.co
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top