For my Canadian friends

1763130787030.png

Brilliant little read from Brad Stuart that totally gets it. Sit down and learn a few things.

"If anyone’s wondering — I’ve voted Conservative, Liberal, and even NDP when the local representative was the best person running. I’ve always tried to vote for the person and the plan, not just the party.

Some of my old friends might be surprised by the tone of this post. Maybe even uncomfortable. That’s okay. I’m not here to convert anyone — I’m just offering some perspective from someone who’s seen governments come and go.

I’m not frustrated by disagreement — that’s healthy. I’m frustrated by the mindless reposting of memes, by empty slogans instead of actual solutions, and by the constant blame game that replaces responsibility with outrage.

Polls show that older Canadians are more likely to support the Liberals and there’s a reason for that: we’ve seen governments come and go. We remember the Petro-Canada era, the National Energy Programam backlash, the Mulroney cuts, the Chrétien surpluses, the Harper austerity, and the COVID-era interventions. We’ve lived through it — not just read about it online. What that history teaches you is that ....

MORE>
 
1763137046051.png

Why Carney not Polievre, is winning over some Conservative MPs.

Conservative caucus members who privately (or quietly) wish for Mark Carney instead of Pierre Poilievre at the helm may seem to be aiming for an unlikely paradox — favoring a Liberal Prime Minister as their own leader. But when you peel back the layers, their unease with Poilievre’s style and a yearning for a more centrist, competent alternative helps explain it.

First, Poilievre’s combative, aggressive leadership style troubles more moderate MPs. Some see his relentless focus on populist messaging and culture-war rhetoric as a liability — polarizing, rather than building broad electoral support. According to reporting, Poilievre has resisted any softening of his “fight-for-affordability” persona, even in the face of caucus discontent. This rigidity, for some, risks isolating the party from voters who are less energized by confrontation.

Second, Carney represents the kind of experienced, steady economic stewardship that appeals to traditional conservatives. He has a background managing global financial crises, and many see him as someone who brings gravitas, credibility, and technocratic competence. In contrast, Poilievre, while a skilled campaigner, is perceived by some as weaker on policy nuance.

Third, public polling strengthens the case for Carney. According to Angus Reid, Carney outpaces Poilievre on key leadership metrics, especially on issues like handling the U.S. and the economy. The Ipsos data also suggest Carney is seen as less likely to capitulate to external pressures than Poilievre. For caucus members worried about electoral prospects, these numbers are hard to ignore.

Finally, for those tired of internal turmoil, Carney offers a vision of governance over grievance. Some Conservative MPs may feel that Carney’s more disciplined, collaborative approach could restore party credibility and broaden appeal — even if it means rethinking their loyalty to Poilievre.
 
Its High Noon for Budget 2025
By Steve Ward
🇨🇦


A vote in the House of Commons on any major piece of legislation, like a throne speech or budget, is viewed as being a confidence measure in the government. As a result, early this coming week, we will face another crossroads of sorts in the Canadian journey. The Liberal budget must secure a majority of the votes cast in order for the minority government to remain in power. If the budget fails to pass the vote, then the government will be defeated because it would no longer have the confidence of the House of Commons to pass legislation.

Parties have been talking and negotiating over the past couple of weeks and, while there is hope that the Liberal budget will pass... somehow...there is always a chance that one or more MPs will make an error during voting, leading to the government’s fall. While no one in Ottawa seems to want another election, none of the opposition parties have indicated at this point whether they will ensure ....

MORE>
 
1763310553519.png

I've been hearing some rumbling from Conservatives about the treatment of vets by the liberals so I wrote this.

It’s suddenly fashionable again to hear Conservatives wringing their hands over the supposed “mistreatment” of veterans under the Liberals. They’ve discovered compassion, apparently. But before we rewrite history, let’s take a quick stroll down memory lane — back to when Stephen Harper and his loyal apprentice Pierre Poilievre were running the show.

Remember the days when the Harper government “honoured” veterans by killing their lifetime pensions? The New Veterans Charter — proudly championed by Harper — replaced lifelong monthly support with a single lump-sum payout. You could lose both legs in Afghanistan and still get less than a deputy minister earns in a year. How’s that for gratitude? When veterans took the government to court to fight for fair treatment, Harper’s crew spent $700,000 of public money arguing Ottawa had no obligation to care for them.

Then came the “efficiency” drive — otherwise known as closing nine Veterans Affairs offices and firing nearly 900 employees who helped process veterans’ claims. The same year, the Conservatives somehow found millions for self-congratulatory ads during hockey playoffs. Because nothing says “support our troops” like a .....

MORE>
 
1763381942384.png

Poilievre's Reflection-Free Leadership
By Steve Ward
🇨🇦


Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre has never struck me as being a particularly deep or critical thinker. Maybe it's the repetitive, nagging and whiny nature of his questions in the House of Commons. Or perhaps it's the fact that his comments about the issues of the day are seldom constructive and he just complains without offering viable alternatives. He is also quick to anger, can be very negative ,and most definitely sees the glass as being half empty, rather than half full. Based on his performance this fall since being back in the House of Commons it seems that Mr. Poilievre is continuing to employ the same tired approaches that Canadians rejected in the previous election. His "gotcha" style of doing politics and his abrasive personality.

It is evident that Poilievre has an inability to look back on a challenge, such as losing his seat in Carleton, and considering what he might have done differently. For example, it was surely a mistake to ....

MORE>
 
While this article was written by Canadians and talks about an outbreak in Alberta it could just as easily be written to describe outbreaks in various US states.

How Alberta Became the Epicentre of Canada’s Measles Outbreak​

A virus eradicated from Canada a generation ago just took the life of a newborn​


The sign on the door knocked the wind out of me: “There are concerns with the rising numbers in the province regarding the measles outbreak. THERE WILL BE A 2 PERSON PER PATIENT VISITING POLICY.”

I work in a labour and delivery unit in Calgary, and our floor had always prided itself on an open visitation policy. Having a baby is a huge moment in a person’s life, and patients do better with support from family and friends. The only other time we’d had to restrict visitors was during the COVID-19 lockdowns in 2020. Before long, things got so bad that our entire unit relocated to another hospital for a few months while our space was held for an anticipated surge of seriously ill people.

At the time, patients and families were scared and confused; we physicians, nurses, clerks, lab staff, and cleaners were worried and burnt out, constantly bracing for what might come next, and we were sometimes sick ourselves. Though COVID-19 administered a collective whipping, vaccination and other public health measures eventually shaped the pandemic into something manageable.

Years later, those memories remain raw, and it can still feel like we’re only just blinking into a post-pandemic dawn. Now it was measles—a disease my colleagues and I once spoke of in the past tense, declared eradicated in Canada a generation ago. And one that, just last week ....

MORE>
 
1763731782571.png

I came across an Alberta site that recently boasted of a "historic" I Am Alberta separatist rally. Apparently, it "ignited unstoppable momentum" for Alberta Sovereignty (aka separation) with a massive (insert sarcasm here) turnout of 10,000-20,000 supporters. That's huge for anyone using the Danielle Smith math theory. No wonder they think they are a huge movement - its the inflated ego resulting from bad math skills.

But they say that "we" are the "minority" - the ones who are now fighting for democracy, chartered rights, to remain in Canada, public education, healthcare and the rights for workers, youth, parents - all Albertans.

Let's look at some actual data numbers of pissed off Albertans to see if they were right and their 10-20k will topple us.

51,000 Public Educators
740,000 Students
175,000 LGBTQ2S+ Albertans
30,341 12 Yr Old Females
29,898 13 Yr Old Females
29,766 14 Yr Old Females
30,182 15 Yr Old Females
30,161 16 Yr Old Females
30,057 17 Yr Old Females
16,000 Healthcare Nurses
300,000 Unionized Members within AFL
456,000 Forever Canadian Supporters

That's approx.1,918,405 Albertans whose rights have either been violated or threatened with the government's use of the notwithstanding clause & separatist ideologies.

That doesn't even include the masses of other Albertans/Canadians who know what is happening in Alberta is wrong! I bet if we added those numbers in - we would be well over 2 million Albertans strong.
Another reason to be thankful for teachers and support public education - it teaches better math skills.

SOURCE

1763731919127.png
 
…until they come for you. The Freedom Convoy made a racket over their rights. If they were genuine, they would be standing in solidarity with teachers and trans people. Only difference is the demographic. The Charter is intended to enshrine certain freedoms, and the UCP are doing all they can to create division and legitimize the stripping of rights. At least, when the Liberals invoked the Emergency Act, it was under the guise of protecting people. The actions of the UCP are intended to oppress specific sectors and individuals. People truly need to understand the difference between what does and what does not affect the rights of others. Trans people don’t affect my life, not yours. They are people, just as everyone else and deserve to be themselves. Teachers are advocating for our youth and the future of society, and strike action is a legal recourse to perpetuate change. If we slowly remove rights, we end up in a police state. It appears people have lost their sense of reason.

1763733198987.png

SOURCE

1763733285337.png
 
"US Ambassador Hoekstra is at it again, threatening US-Canada relations and hurling false accusations towards Prime Minister Carney for considering reneging on our American-made F-35 fighter jets deal. (Oh, the irony.)

In related Canadian politics news, the CEO of Saab, manufacturer of the Gripen fighter jet leading alternative, visited Prime Minister Carney this week. Let’s compare the F-35 and Gripen fighter jets, and see how various Canadian experts and US experts (lobbyists?) are weighing in"

 

Attachments

  • 1763818357883.png
    1763818357883.png
    221 KB · Views: 1
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top