Virginia /
Published July 3, 2026 9:45am EDT
Virginia county urges power saving measures amid 25% electricity rate hike, data center growth
County manager cites Great Recession era austerity as power bills climb 25% in data center capital
By
Robert McGreevy FOX Business
John Vithoulkas, the county manager in Virginia's Henrico County, is asking county employees to cut back on power usage as electricity rates soar 25% across Virginia, the state with by far the most data centers.
Virginia's Henrico County is implementing energy austerity measures to combat a $5 million spike in utility costs as the state's data center industry explodes.
www.foxbusiness.com
"AI is not computers" alone. BUT !
These data center computers are guzzling electrons on industrial scale, not only jostling commercial electric power markets,
but also computer hard-drive, and Silicon computer chip markets too. The result, the cost of smart-phones and consumer grade computers is increasing, after decades of progressive price decrease.
The "A" in "AI" stands for "artificial". That means Silicon which eats electrons, not Carbon, which eats pizza. BUT !
Yeah, firing hundreds of human engineers is premature, the result of non-technical management making management decisions.
In general, brains and computers are just binary switches, with on/off.
But human brains have about 4 million more of these switches than our largest computers.
And we do not know well how to program reality into the computers, while humans have a billion years of natural selection programming.
So the current assumption that computers can do anything better than humans is incredibly premature.
For example, there now have been hundreds of airplane crashes due to the autopilot anti-stall programming that causes planes to go into steep dives that are often fatal.
Here is an example:
{...
On the afternoon of April 28, 2009, a Cirrus SR22 took off into a 200-foot overcast from Cleveland’s Cuyahoga County Airport. It crashed four and a half minutes later, killing both on board. The pilot acknowledged the tower controller’s hand-off, but never made contact with departure control.
The Cirrus was cleared to take off from Runway 6 with instructions to fly runway heading and climb to 3,000 feet msl. Data recovered from its avionics suite showed that it began turning right almost immediately. The right turn continued through about 540 degrees—one and a half complete revolutions—before the airplane finally rolled out on a southerly heading. It then climbed from 1,200 feet msl to 2,700 feet msl in 17 seconds as its airspeed decayed to 50 knots before it fell back to 1,600 feet msl, reversing heading yet again.
During the next two minutes, it climbed and dropped two more times, reaching a peak altitude of 3,200 feet msl. Pitch angle ranged from 50-degrees nose up to 60-degrees nose down and airspeed varied between 50 knots and 172 kt. Bank angles reached 75 degrees. The final data point showed the airplane pitched 30 degrees nose down and partially inverted, banked 120 degrees over the right wing.
The data logger also recorded that the autopilot was engaged about five seconds after takeoff at an altitude of 940 feet msl, just 61 feet above field elevation. However, instead of altitude preselect mode (already programmed for 3,000 feet with an 850 fpm rate of climb), it was set for altitude hold. This automatically set the altitude bug to 940 feet msl, which the autopilot attempted to recapture as the airplane climbed. The series of inputs recorded during the subsequent oscillations led the NTSB to conclude that “the pilot never adequately regained control of the airplane” while attempting to reset the altitude and heading bugs.
Of course, he had alternatives. The most obvious would have been to disconnect the autopilot and hand-fly the climb.
...}
The point being that human programmers lack expertise, subtlety, and understanding how to really program physical events into computers.
Which was my specialty for over 50 years.