Shiftless2
Well-known member
If you disagree with those statements instead of stating your unsupported opinions please provide evidence in the form of peer reviewed articles in legitimate medical and scientific journals.
What to call this thread?
- Thread starter Shiftless2
- Start date
Shiftless2
Well-known member
“Rady Children’s Health has chosen to violate its merger agreement and California law in response to the Trump Administration’s illegal campaign against providers of gender-affirming care,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Rady flagrantly disregarded its legal obligations by unilaterally deciding to preemptively comply with the Administration’s demands and cease medically necessary care for roughly 1,450 patients. We will not allow Rady to violate its obligations to its patients and the State. We will fight to uphold the law and ensure Californians can access gender-affirming care without facing unfair roadblocks.”
I use my own personal experience, and found obvious fault with the proposed argument.
Neither of those would at all be aided by "peer reviewed articles in legitimate medical and scientific journals".
Shiftless2
Well-known member
So you admit it's just your uneducated opinion - claims pulled out of your nether regions - nothing backed by facts, science medicine, or anything meaningful.
Oh come on, there is no academic agreement, and personal experience is the most definitive when it comes to something like this.
Shiftless2
Well-known member
So you're saying you pulled your claims out of your nether regions and are unable to support them. Glad you admit it.
Seems to me you each recognize these distinctions among male / female / other / non include more than one criterion.
It's not only genital configuration.
It's not only XX or XY.
etc.
The appeal of simple, clear distinctions is obvious. It facilitates local pub distinctions such as an illustration of trousers vs a skirt on the facility door.
By page #68 of this thread what seems clear,
out of a human population of over 8 Billion, it's more complicated than convenient binary distinction.
It's not only genital configuration.
It's not only XX or XY.
etc.
The appeal of simple, clear distinctions is obvious. It facilitates local pub distinctions such as an illustration of trousers vs a skirt on the facility door.
By page #68 of this thread what seems clear,
out of a human population of over 8 Billion, it's more complicated than convenient binary distinction.