... topic drift overflow ...
- Thread starter sear
- Start date
Aren't we padre?
Have YOU ever seen god?
What rational reason do you have for believing god can see us?
If people think Christ was white, then they know so little about him that their whole religion is pointless.
George Carlin said we created him (god) in our own image and likeness.
Is it naïve of me to define Christians by their adherence to Christ's teachings, rather than flesh-tone?
But Christians do not seem to adhere very well.
There not only are historic contradictions like inquisitions, conquistadors, and crusades, but modern racism like murdering over half a million Iraqis over WMD lies.
I do not think the US would have done that to a European country.
“Is god willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him god?” ― Epicurus(341-270BC)
I as a conscientious agnostic consider it deeply offensive to grant poseurs credibility regarding their false claims.
If they want the prestige of being Christian, then they should first earn it legitimately.
Mother Theresa may have.
Tomás de Torquemada clearly did not.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him god?” ― Epicurus(341-270BC)
Then why call them Christians? Because THEY claim to be, for the prestige?
I as a conscientious agnostic consider it deeply offensive to grant poseurs credibility regarding their false claims.
If they want the prestige of being Christian, then they should first earn it legitimately.
Mother Theresa may have.
Tomás de Torquemada clearly did not.
I'm not sure I qualify as a First Amendment absolutist, but I support my countrymen's Constitutionally enumerated right to pick a religion, or not.
There is no stipulation about what or why.
You may be within your Constitutional right to criticize them.
Count yourself lucky you have no Constitutional right to nullify them about it, "pointless" or not.
The problem is they seem more than willing to murder people in fast boats or in the Mideast, so then I suspect it is racism.
With Israel, it also shows religious bigotry, not only about the claim of being the "Chosen People", but the false claims against Islam like how they kill nonbelievers.
This may at least to some appear to be a deliberate condemnation of Christianity as a whole.
But the ostensible substantiation included seems to be unrepresentative of Christianity as a whole.
Surely there are plausible reasons for fault-finders to quibble.
But are those that attack a group comprised of many millions on multiple continents
based on feeble construct any better than those they condemn?
Insulting true Christians based on the bigotry of poseurs is disgraceful.
Well I do not actually know how many Christians support Palestine vs those supporting Israel?
The distinction I'd hoped to make is between those that pretend to be Christian for the prestige,
vs those that are Christian.
"Honor means sacrificing yourself for the benefit of others.
Dishonor means sacrificing others for the benefit of yourself."
Lanny Davis,Special Counsel to President Clinton