The Second Term of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States of America

"A recession is when your neighbor loses his job. A depression is when you lose yours." S2 #559
... & a celebration when Trump loses his?

"Republican Senators knew he was completely unqualified for the job ... no question ... but they still ....." S2 #560
They had a choice: do their job, or keep their job.

" BREAKING: Former National Security Advisor Susan Rice enrages MAGA world ..." #560
The Republicans have fallen in line with a madman.
The Democrats haven't.
Not yet clear which has the advantage in 2028. BUT
More from Wikipedia

"America is not safe." #560
Trump meets all the requirements for Troglodyte of the Year. BUT
not clear Trump alone can drive all humanity back to the stone age. BUT
Perhaps Trump & Putin together can.
And will ?
 
If his approval rating keeps dropping, he’s going to do something really crazy
1745667460155.png


And note that that's from Fox

1745667558793.png
 

Attachments

  • 1745667397016.png
    1745667397016.png
    418.5 KB · Views: 0
1745667944582.png


We’ve been reading stories like this for over a decade. Each one meant to signify an inflection point, a turning of the tide. Yet the tide never turns.

As of today, Donald Trump’s supposedly “tanking” approval rating stands at 47%. Which is pretty much where it’s been for the past eleven years. Yes, its seen upticks and downturns over that time, occasionally even dipping into the thirties. Yes, a majority of Americans dissaprove of the tarriffs. Yes, a majority think the economy is heading in the wrong direction. And yes, a majority dissaprove of the job Trump is doing.

That’s not new. Trump’s popularity has almost never been above 50%, except for very brief periods of time. He’s never needed it to be. His power derives not from the size but the durability of his popular support, and there’s rarely been an approval rating as stubbornly durable as his.

Especially given the hundreds — thousands — of incidents over the past decade that would have sunk the careers of, say, Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or Hillary Clinton.

Think of it. All the corruption, the scandal, the pain and death and misery. All the insults to human decency and injuries to democratic ideals.

And his numbers are still pretty much where they were when it all started.

I am uninterested in whatever minor fluctuation will follow yesterday’s vile display in the Oval Office, or tomorrow’s outrage, or next week’s. They will mean nothing.

What Trump supporters (as a whole, as a voting bloc, PLEASE dont tell me about your MAGA cousin who’s having second thoughts) are thinking means nothing. The only thing that matters is what Trump’s opponents are thinking. What we’re thinking.

I remember making posts like this during Trump’s first term, and wondering exactly what I’m wondering right now.

Which is very much not, “What will it take for his supporters to turn away from him,” but rather, “What will it take for his opponents to realize his supporters won’t turn away from him?”

Because the answer to that question is crucial. It will shape everything that happens over the next few weeks and months.

If, as I suspect, a sizable number of us are sitting at home today thinking that Trump’s open defiance of a Supreme Court ruling, refusal to return an innocent, legal resident of the US from a gulag in El Salvador, and declaration that he wants to send American citizens to the same prison without due process, will somehow harm his approval rating, that does not bode well for our side.

Nothing will harm his approval rating.

Sure it might — might — go down a few points in the next few days. It won’t mean a thing. Give it a few weeks.

To believe otherwise is to not understand the story of the Trump era. The story of the Trump era isn’t “A bad man came along and duped a bunch of well-meaning, gullible people.” Donald Trump didn’t conjure his supporters from the ether with his magic MAGA wand. His supporters conjured him.

They wanted him. Badly. They’d been looking, searching, begging, screaming for someone like him, pushing every Republican candidate further and further to the right with every election cycle, demanding loudly that they “take a tougher” line on this, and “not give an inch” on that, that they “tell it like it is,” and “say what everyone is thinking,” for years. For decades.

They weren't duped. They are never going to see the light. (Of course a few will, here and there. But not in meaningful numbers.) There will be no scales falling from eyes, no epiphanies, no death bed conversions. Not among the bedrock base, which has not budged an inch in ten years.

They waved signs that said, MASS DEPORTATIONS NOW at their third Trump convention.

They weren’t duped.

The only duping that’s gone on is the self-duping many of us have been guilty of for many years. It’s a very human, very understandable, thing to do. To think better of your fellow human beings than perhaps they do themselves. To believe that, with enough patience, empathy, education and reason they are bound to see the error of their ways.

That belief is a dangerous one in this moment. It manifests in political choices that are bound to not only fail, but help the bad guys continue doing bad things.

It doesnt matter if a few thousand Trump supporters see the error of their ways. It doesn’t matter if this or that Republican politician is momentarily siezed by courage or conscience and speaks up about his or her disappointment in the president. The overwhelming majority of Trump supporters will remain Trump supporters NO MATTER WHAT.

Did you ever think you’d see Republican voters support a candidate who was openly subservient to Russia? Did you ever think you’d see them support a flagrant, serial adulterer and drug user? A denigrator of the military? A draft dodger? A New Yorker?

In 2014 Republicans raged at President Obama for supposedly not working hard enough to stop the Ebola epidemic. Six years later they followed Trump’s lead and physically threatened people working to stop an epidemic.

Nothing will shake them. Well, almost nothing.

There is one thing, one thing Donald Trump could do to lose significant support. And no, it is not making his supporters “feel the pain.” It is not making them poor. These are people who are openly welcoming an imminent recession.

No, the one and only thing Donald Trump could do to tank his approval rating would be to stand in front of a camera and say, “Black and Latino people are as fully human as any white man or woman. They are posessed of the same inalienable rights, and deserving of the full enjoyment of those rights and the opportunities they promise, opportunities they have for too long been denied.”

Now THAT would be a deal breaker.

Because that’s the deal. They give him everything, he gives them fewer Black actors on their TV’s, fewer Black managers at their offices, fewer Latino pilots on their planes, fewer Spanish names on the backs of their team’s uniforms.

He breaks THAT deal, and all bets are off.

So we need to get it straight. We cannot see this struggle as a debate, as a project of persuasion. If some MAGA supporters are persuaded along the way, great! I say welcome them with open arms. And never, ever stop fighting hard to make their lives better. All of their lives.

But progress is going to come when we, not they, see the light. Before the left can meanigfully slow the MAGA rampage it needs to come to terms with the fact that the enemy isn’t merely Trump, but the people who put him in the White House.

That is a very hard thing for a lot of us on the left to accept about our countrymen. But this struggle is more analogous to a civil war than it is to a heightened disagreement between poltical parties. We won’t win it by persuading the enemy, but by overwhelming him.

Our energies should be channeled towards each other. Galvanizing, motivating, and enabling each other. Creating and sustaining solidarity. We can get a hundred first-time protestors out in the streets, or first-time voters to the polls, for the same investment it takes to turn one MAGA supporter toward the light.

Our hope doesn’t lie in Trump’s poll numbers going down. It lies in our commitment to keeping students from being disappeared and government workers from being fired and cancer research labs from being defunded and democracy from being destroyed.

Our hope doesn’t lie with them, it lies with us.

Peter Birkenhead
 

Boxers or briefs? Depends.

Ic8F0IL.jpeg



Bh7EfT5.jpeg


Have to ask. Can't he go for one day without being a national embarrassment?
 
Trump administration has deported a 2-year-old U.S. citizen to Honduras with no meaningful process and against the wishes of her father. Trump administration claims it was the mother’s wishes, but they have no record or evidence to support such claims. The petition said, that their daughter was a U.S. citizen and could not be deported. It is illegal and unconstitutional to deport a U.S. citizen.

Update: Apologies for any confusion the child was deported alongside their mother. The Trump administration attempted to bully the family and forcibly deported the child against the family’s wishes. For context, in the U.S., you typically can’t even take a child across state lines without consent from both parents let alone deport them to another country. The goal here was clear: Trump was trying to undermine birthright citizenship, just like he pushed for in his earlier executive order.
 
"Trump" "deported" #565
Nope, not exactly sure why.
- Trump's own xenophobia? Perhaps. Or
- Trump's understanding of the power of prevailing xenophobia as a political tool / expedient within the electorate? Or
- the sheer sadistic thrill of inflicting injustice with impunity?
 

Pam Bondi rescinds Biden-era protections for journalists

Memo from attorney general about criminal leak investigations calls conduct of leakers ‘treasonous’

Memo from attorney general about criminal leak investigations calls conduct of leakers ‘treasonous’

Léonie Chao-Fong in Washington
Fri 25 Apr 2025 23.16 BST
Share


Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, has revoked a Biden administration-era policy that restricted subpoenas of reporters’ phone records in criminal investigations.

An internal memo, first reported by ABC News, shows Bondi rescinding protections issued by her predecessor, Merrick Garland, for members of the media from having their records seized or being forced to testify in the course of leak investigations.

The memo says federal employees who leak sensitive information to the media “for the purposes of personal enrichment and undermining our foreign policy, national security, and government effectiveness” are engaging in conduct that could be characterized as “treasonous”.

“This conduct is illegal and wrong, and it must stop,” the memo states. The justice department “will not tolerate disclosures that undermine President Trump’s policies, victimize government agencies, and cause harm to the American people”.

Bondi’s memo states that she has concluded that “it is necessary to rescind Merrick Garland’s policies precluding the Department of Justice from seeking records and compelling testimony from members of the news media in order to identify and punish the source of improper leaks”.

But, she said, the department would continue to employ procedural protections to “limit the use of compulsory legal process” to obtain journalists’ records, acknowledging that a “free and independent press is vital to the functioning of our democracy”.

Under the new policy, Bondi wrote, the attorney general “must ....

CONTINUED
 
"Bondi rescinds" #567
"We learn from history that we do not learn from history." Hegel
Though Hitler not the only example, the noose-tightening progression is familiar.

What's baffling about this MAGA stampede toward the precipice, just what Utopia do they expect to find after they've plummeted into their abyss? The gulf between rich and poor expanded a little? $wealth $distribution
 
And then they came after the children... #569
I'm running out of synonyms for horrendous.

Meanwhile ...

Remember this, the one blue suit at the funeral ...
At the "oval office spat" mentioned by ABC below, Zelenskyy was criticized for what he was wearing.

Apparently for the pope's "funeral" Zelenskyy was in black, Trump in blue. Make of that what you will.

ZelenskyyVatican.JPG

Have to ask. Can't he go for one day without being a national embarrassment?
Pope Francis was a world leader. And like the best of leaders Francis has lead by example.
Let us hope after Trump's burial, his posthumous embarrassments will orange in comparison. (pail in comparison?)
 
Fortune

DOGE’s mass federal workforce cuts may cost taxpayers $135 billion this fiscal year alone​

Sasha Rogelberg / Sun, April 27, 2025 at 7:02 AM EDT

DOGE initially promised to identify and eliminate $2 trillion in the first months of President Donald Trump’s second term, though Musk drastically cut that figure down to $150 billion—just 7.5% of his original estimated savings.

DOGE claims to have saved the government $150 million in waste, fraud, and abuse, but some federal workforce and policy experts believe Elon Musk’s cost-cutting efforts have proven expensive to taxpayers. The chaos of personnel changes have tanked productivity, one expert claims, costing the government billions in wasted payroll. Fired IRS employees are no longer able to carry out audits to bring in key revenue, another argued.
As Elon Musk prepares to step back from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), his goal to rout out government waste, fraud, and abuse may have fallen short. Some experts warn his efforts may actually be costing the government billions in lost labor and revenue.

Those spending cuts have impacted 260,000 federal workers, who have been fired, taken buyouts, or retired early since Trump’s return to the White House, Reuters calculated. Between layoffs and resignations, the Internal Revenue Service may lose up to one-third of its 100,000-strong workforce, about 22,000 of which may take Trump’s most recent resignation offer, The New York Times reported earlier this month.

The mass exodus of federal workers may mean the government has fewer salaries to pay, but it also could critically reduce the amount of work it can conduct, including collecting revenue from tax audits.

“We do need to have our government work better, but the approaches that have been adopted so far are taking us in the exact wrong direction,” Max Stier, chief executive of government efficiency and workforce nonprofit Partnership for Public Service, told Fortune.

“The end result will be that the American public will be holding the bag as Elon Musk goes back to his private enterprises.”

Quantifying the cost of DOGE

The Partnership of Public Service estimated DOGE could be costing taxpayers roughly $135 billion. With the 2.3 million people in the federal workforce receiving a total $270 billion in annual payroll, Stier believes the cost of firing, re-hiring, and putting workers on paid leave—as well as the losses in productivity as a result of the personnel changes—has cost the government about half of that total payroll.

A Yale University Budget Lab report from March found additional evidence that DOGE’s intended saving may be costing the government. While it’s unclear how much of the IRS’s workforce will be reduced, the Budget Lab calculated that should 22,000 employees leave the agency, it would lose $8.5 billion in net revenue in 2026, largely as a result of fewer personnel available to conduct audits. Over 10 years, this loss would amount to nearly $198 billion in revenue, according to the report.

 
Back
Top