The Virginia Department of Corrections has recorded audio of at least 30 executions over the last three decades, but it has no plans to release the tapes publicly. The department rejected an Associated Press request under the state's public records law to release the recordings after NPR obtained and reported on four of them.
https://news.yahoo.com/virginia-doc-says-execution-audio-145406712.htmlThe age-old debate is unresolved.
Are government criminal penalties to punish, or to deter?
We need not pick a side in that debate to acknowledge that keeping this evidence secret has consequences.
a) Rightly or wrongly it presents the impression the government policy makers responsible for this evidence being kept secret from the tax payers that fund it are ashamed of it, that they deem it something to hide.
b) Even if deterrence is not the primary intended purpose of criminal penalties, what is to be gained by defeating that constructive deterrent component of this most serious of all government penalties?
Capital punishment itself is under scrutiny. Many of our commercial trading partners and military allies have abandoned it, excluded it from their criminal justice protocol.
Is the U.S. the barbarian among them? Both continuing the practice in some States, and keeping the potentially deterrent evidence secret?