New Brett Kavanaugh Sexual Assault Allegations Revealed in Secret Sundance Doc

Internal emails dispute Trump’s claims that FBI had ‘free rein’ to probe Kavanaugh allegations, new report says

By Tierney Sneed,

Then-President Donald Trump’s claims in 2018 that the FBI would have full leeway to investigate sexual assault allegations about his Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, appeared to confuse the agency, according to internal communications cited in a Senate Democrat’s new report.

The investigation into the allegations – which Kavanaugh has vehemently denied – was sought after an emotional hearing with his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, prompted some crucial senators to balk at confirming the nominee.

The White House, however, instructed the FBI to only interview 10 witnesses, according to the report. The FBI was also not given authority to seek out other witnesses who might have corroborating information, nor did it have permission to go beyond the specific subject areas outlined by the White House for questioning the witnesses.

The report sheds light on the tight limits the White House imposed on the FBI as it undertook a “supplemental” background investigation while Kavanaugh’s confirmation hung in the balance. Senate investigators were able to review contemporaneous internal communications between the White House and the FBI that showed how the public narrative Trump and his allies were pushing differed from the instructions the FBI had received.

Senate investigators were not able to obtain copies of key emails between the FBI and Trump White House, and instead were only allowed to view many of the emails cited in the report in camera (meaning behind closed doors, with no option for making copies), so CNN has not had access to the emails themselves.

When the FBI embarked on the so-called supplemental investigation into the Kavanaugh allegations, Trump claimed in public remarks that the agency was “talking to everybody” and had “free rein,” and even blasted an NBC News report on the investigation’s limitations on Twitter. According to ....

CONTINUED
 
More on the same #2
Sexual misconduct by anyone is an issue, a matter for concern.
When the sexual misconduct is by a supreme court member the clash of the criminality raises obvious additional concerns.

Is it rational to expect judicious temperament, and responsible judgement from such a criminal?

Consider the context:
Anti-vaxers may have killed hundreds of thousands.
Disinformers complicate recovery from hurricanes Helene & Milton.
Compulsive liar and convicted felon Trump has significant chance to be reelected president of the United States.

In such dystopian context, any wonder a sex scandal by a SCOTUS member barely raises an eyebrow? The context of crisis fatigue has shifted standards of what is acceptable. We have placed ourselves in enormous jeopardy.


"The COVID vaccine I would very safely estimate would be seen as one of the greatest scientific achievements of humanity ever." ...
"The estimates are from the Kaiser Family Foundation that between July of'21 and April of '22 when vaccines were available and free to everybody 234,000 Americans died unnecessarily because of misinformation. The culture wars killed a lot of people." former NIH director, author of The Road To Wisdom, Dr. Francis S. Collins 24/09/17
 
Back
Top