MEDIA ALERT : Republican Presidential Candidate Debate Tonight, Wednesday Dec. 6 from 8pm to 10pm ET

sear

Administrator
Staff member
https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/debates/

And for the troglodytes with a roof antenna, the CW network is also scheduled to broadcast this 2 hour event this evening.

Beware.
While this is a "gloves off" fracas to obtain the second choice position for the Republican nomination, one of these candidates may possibly be the next president of the United States.

- how in the %$#@ did we get here !? -
 
The following is from https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/rnc-fourth-presidential-primary-debate-12-06-23-transcript
a record of yesterday's Republican presidential candidate debate.

Elizabeth Vargas (17:35): to Ron DeSantis
... I’d like to first get to some questions on Israel.
Eight Americans have been held hostage in the tunnels beneath Gaza for 60 days now, American troops and warships in the Middle East are under attack. How far would you go as president to secure the release of those eight American hostages and would it include sending American forces into combat?

Ron DeSantis (18:13): ...

(18:54) ...

Elizabeth Vargas (19:51):
But would you send American troops?

Chris Christie (19:55):
This is [inaudible 00:19:53]. This is the problem with the first three debates, Ron gets asked a question and he doesn’t answer it. Your question was very specific, you said, would you send American troops as commander in chief? And he went on to this minute and 30 second hosanna about his knowledge of the military and what we need to do and didn’t answer your question. Look, when your President of the United States, you’re not going to have a choice whether to answer that question or not. Your generals, your Secretary of Defense, your Secretary of State, your National Security Advisor are going to present plans to you. They’re going to look at you and say, “Do we go or don’t we, Mr. President?” And you can’t give a 90-second speech about your military services. Honorable as it is.

Elizabeth Vargas (20:35):
So would you send American troops in to rescue those hostages?

Chris Christie (20:36):
I would, absolutely. Absolutely. If they had a plan which showed me that we could get them out safely, you’re damn right I’d send the American Army in there to get our people home and get them home now, and I’ll answer that question directly.

Elizabeth Vargas (20:50):
Thank you Governor Christie.

Governor Chris Christie was the adult in the room last night, even with some minor function as a 4th moderator.

And Governor Christie did reply in superlative terms, as his opponent President Trump frequently does. BUT:

Though Governor Christie pretends to have answered this question, he really didn't.

The question was:
Elizabeth Vargas (20:35):
So would you send American troops in to rescue those hostages?
In reality freeing such hostages is exceedingly difficult. And the risk is that they may be murdered by their captors to thwart their rescue.

Though Christie pretended to answer the question asked,
the question Christie answered was a fantasy, not realistic question, premised on the delusional absurdity, in Christie's own words:
"If they had a plan which showed me that we could get them out safely, you’re damn right I’d send the American Army in there to get our people home and get them home now, and I’ll answer that question directly." Christie
"If ..."?
It is a virtual certitude the hypothetical premise Christie invented as a premise of his reply doesn't happen. When in history has it ever?

Governor Christie might be a better Republican president than Donald Trump was.
But though Christie might have won this question with style points, in real world terms Christie's answer wasn't much better than Governor DeSantis'.

Governor Christie:
The notion of sending U.S. military troops into an active combat zone to achieve an objective as challenging as rescuing eight American civilians "safely" (your word governor) is fantasy.
We need a U.S. Commander in Chief with a reality based belief system sir.
 
Not sure this is actually an opposing opinion. It's another opinion:

CNN
Opinion

Opinion: The finest speech ever given in a presidential debate​

Opinion by Todd Graham / Thu, December 7, 2023 at 11:11 AM EST 7

Editor’s Note: Todd Graham is a professor of debate at Southern Illinois University. His teams have won five national championships; he’s been named the national debate coach of the year three times and been presented with the lifetime achievement award in academia and debate. You can find him at his website, on Facebook and on Twitter. The views expressed in this commentary are his own. View more opinion at CNN.
I’ve watched more than 8,000 debates. Admittedly, my life is not terribly exciting. But after Wednesday night’s fourth Republican presidential debate at the University of Alabama, I was rollin’ like the tide.
If you were lucky enough to watch, you were treated to the finest speech ever given in a presidential debate. Let’s get right to it — here’s how the four candidates scored:

Chris Christie: A+​

...
Christie might have just given the single most important speech in presidential debating history. It was certainly the finest.
 
Back
Top