The Second Term of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States of America
- Thread starter sear
- Start date
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Fewer items and lesser quality
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Now that you've seen the comparison in #1,782
Good morning! Donald Trump spent the week insisting that all is well. Grocery prices are down, electricity is down, cars are down, gas is down, and Thanksgiving will apparently be cheaper than at any point since the Mayflower docked. He told this to foreign dignitaries over dinner as if reading aloud from a parallel universe, citing a “very powerful report” from Walmart that somehow proves the cost of living has plummeted under his leadership.
The problem? The “powerful report” was a sales promotion for a stripped-down holiday meal. Walmart’s “for-ten-under-forty-bucks” feast includes six fewer items than last year’s and relies on generic brands and shrinkflation as a marketing trick, not economic policy. But in Trump’s America, coupons have replaced data, and the difference between a discount and a delusion has been erased by executive order.
BBC Verify fact-checked the president’s economic fairy tales and found the story rotting on the shelf. Grocery prices have risen 2.7 percent since he took office, with coffee up nearly 19 percent and ground beef up 13. His 50 percent tariff on Brazilian beans hasn’t brought relief so much as higher prices and empty shelves. Electricity, which he promised to cut in half, has instead climbed 11 percent while his war on renewables kneecaps supply. Cars now cost over $50,000 on average, gas remains well above $3 a gallon, and his tariff tantrums have added at least another percentage point to inflation.
And then there’s food. Not prices this time, but access. A federal judge in Rhode Island had to order the president of the United States to feed his citizens, ruling that the Trump administration’s refusal to release full November SNAP benefits was causing “irreparable harm.” Judge John McConnell called out the USDA’s incompetence, noting that 42 million Americans were on the brink of hunger because the government couldn’t be bothered to push a button.
The administration tried to pass off “partial payments” as progress, Washingtonese for “we did nothing and wrote a memo about it.” McConnell wasn’t buying it. In a scathing ruling, he ordered the USDA to draw immediately from both the $5.5 billion contingency fund and the $23 billion Section 32 fund (normally used for school lunches and child nutrition) to make full payments by Friday, November 7. He rejected the USDA’s claim that doing so would ....
MORE>
Good morning! Donald Trump spent the week insisting that all is well. Grocery prices are down, electricity is down, cars are down, gas is down, and Thanksgiving will apparently be cheaper than at any point since the Mayflower docked. He told this to foreign dignitaries over dinner as if reading aloud from a parallel universe, citing a “very powerful report” from Walmart that somehow proves the cost of living has plummeted under his leadership.
The problem? The “powerful report” was a sales promotion for a stripped-down holiday meal. Walmart’s “for-ten-under-forty-bucks” feast includes six fewer items than last year’s and relies on generic brands and shrinkflation as a marketing trick, not economic policy. But in Trump’s America, coupons have replaced data, and the difference between a discount and a delusion has been erased by executive order.
BBC Verify fact-checked the president’s economic fairy tales and found the story rotting on the shelf. Grocery prices have risen 2.7 percent since he took office, with coffee up nearly 19 percent and ground beef up 13. His 50 percent tariff on Brazilian beans hasn’t brought relief so much as higher prices and empty shelves. Electricity, which he promised to cut in half, has instead climbed 11 percent while his war on renewables kneecaps supply. Cars now cost over $50,000 on average, gas remains well above $3 a gallon, and his tariff tantrums have added at least another percentage point to inflation.
And then there’s food. Not prices this time, but access. A federal judge in Rhode Island had to order the president of the United States to feed his citizens, ruling that the Trump administration’s refusal to release full November SNAP benefits was causing “irreparable harm.” Judge John McConnell called out the USDA’s incompetence, noting that 42 million Americans were on the brink of hunger because the government couldn’t be bothered to push a button.
The administration tried to pass off “partial payments” as progress, Washingtonese for “we did nothing and wrote a memo about it.” McConnell wasn’t buying it. In a scathing ruling, he ordered the USDA to draw immediately from both the $5.5 billion contingency fund and the $23 billion Section 32 fund (normally used for school lunches and child nutrition) to make full payments by Friday, November 7. He rejected the USDA’s claim that doing so would ....
MORE>
Shiftless2
Well-known member
If you ever doubted it was about anything except the cruelty
That would explain it, certainly.
It's not the only possible explanation.
I suspect there's also a simple authoritarian element. Trump wants to be obeyed, regardless of how unreasonable his commands are.
That's substantiated by Trump's loyalty purge of the U.S. military, and such shocking excesses as demolishing the white house East wing.
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Shiftless2
Well-known member
There you have it
The GOP Gerrymandered 5 more Rep. seats from Texas
Perhaps the Republicans believed the Democrats wouldn't retaliate, respond, as the Democrats did in California
Gerrymandering 5 more Dem. house seats.
California and Texas Are Going Full Gilded Age
Critics of partisan redistricting efforts overlook a key tradition from American history.By Joshua Zeitz11/03/2025 09:34 AM EST
Joshua Zeitz, a Politico Magazine contributing writer, is the author of Lincoln's God: How Faith Transformed a President and a Nation (May 2023). Follow him @joshuamzeitz.
... California voters will go to the polls to decide whether the state should authorize mid-decade redistricting to counter gerrymandering in Republican states and keep Democrats competitive in the House. The measure has divided the party, which in recent decades has made independent redistricting commissions — bodies designed to take map-drawing out of politicians’ hands and prevent the kind of mid-decade rewrites used for partisan gain — almost an article of faith, a way to prove their commitment to process, fairness and the broader health of democracy itself.
To its critics, the idea smacks of political opportunism dressed up as reform; to its supporters, it’s a necessary corrective to similar Republican maneuvers in Texas, Indiana and North Carolina. “If one side is going to cheat, all bets are off,” Democratic Texas State Rep. James Talarico told Mother Jones. “Maybe that kind of pressure will convince our Republican colleagues and the president to walk back from the brink.”
For all the modern talk of violating democratic “norms” during the Trump era, however, strategic redistricting has always been a powerful weapon in American politics. Efforts by politicians to tilt the electoral playing field through redistricting and other manipulations are almost as old as American democracy itself, and indeed, by the late 19th century, both parties had turned redistricting into a blood sport.
What’s unfolding in California is less a break from tradition than a reversion to it — ...
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Didn't anyone ever tell you:
The GOP Gerrymandered 5 more Rep. seats from Texas
Perhaps the Republicans believed the Democrats wouldn't retaliate, respond, as the Democrats did in California
Gerrymandering 5 more Dem. house seats.
It's only Gerrymandering if the other guy does it
Shiftless2
Well-known member
BREAKING NEWS: Rock legend Keith Richards just torched Mark Zuckerberg and other billionaires — right to their faces — calling out their greed… and then proved his point with action.
At a lavish awards show in Manhattan, surrounded by designer suits, crystal glasses of champagne, and egos bigger than Jeff Bezos’s rocket, Richards, now 81, grabbed the mic — and dropped a truth bomb right in the middle of America’s money-worshipping elite.
When accepting the award for Cultural Icon of the Year, he didn’t thank a “team,” didn’t tear up over his legacy, and didn’t whisper a polite “thank you.”
No.
He stared straight at the room packed with billionaires — including Mark Zuckerberg — and said:
CONTINUED
Shiftless2
Well-known member
These attitudes have always existed - Trump just made it socially acceptable to express them ....
Shiftless2
Well-known member
BREAKING: Trump demands that his felony conviction be overturned — and now the Justice Department is working overtime to do his bidding.
In a move that would make even the most corrupt dictators blush, Donald Trump’s Department of Justice has done something truly extraordinary — and not in a good way. The DOJ has filed a legal brief asking a New York appeals court to overturn Trump’s felony conviction in the Manhattan hush-money case.
That’s right: the sitting president’s own Justice Department is now acting as his personal defense team.
Let that sink in. The federal government — which is supposed to serve the people — is now working overtime to help Donald Trump, the only U.S. president ever convicted of a felony, erase his crimes from the record.
According to Bloomberg, DOJ lawyers argued that Trump’s conviction last year should be tossed out because the trial allegedly included evidence of “official acts.” Their claim? That the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling on presidential immunity means Trump can’t be prosecuted for anything he did while in office — no matter how corrupt, deceitful, or self-serving.
This is the same Supreme Court that handed Trump a get-out-of-jail-free card by declaring presidents are immune for “official acts.” And now, Trump’s DOJ is taking that outrageous decision and using it as a crowbar to pry open the cell door he belongs behind.
Never mind that Trump’s crime had nothing to do with governing. The hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels weren’t “official acts” — they were acts of desperation by a man terrified that ....
MORE>
In a move that would make even the most corrupt dictators blush, Donald Trump’s Department of Justice has done something truly extraordinary — and not in a good way. The DOJ has filed a legal brief asking a New York appeals court to overturn Trump’s felony conviction in the Manhattan hush-money case.
That’s right: the sitting president’s own Justice Department is now acting as his personal defense team.
Let that sink in. The federal government — which is supposed to serve the people — is now working overtime to help Donald Trump, the only U.S. president ever convicted of a felony, erase his crimes from the record.
According to Bloomberg, DOJ lawyers argued that Trump’s conviction last year should be tossed out because the trial allegedly included evidence of “official acts.” Their claim? That the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling on presidential immunity means Trump can’t be prosecuted for anything he did while in office — no matter how corrupt, deceitful, or self-serving.
This is the same Supreme Court that handed Trump a get-out-of-jail-free card by declaring presidents are immune for “official acts.” And now, Trump’s DOJ is taking that outrageous decision and using it as a crowbar to pry open the cell door he belongs behind.
Never mind that Trump’s crime had nothing to do with governing. The hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels weren’t “official acts” — they were acts of desperation by a man terrified that ....
MORE>
From the previously linked Politico article:
Note:
Reportedly Elbridge Gerry pronounced his own last name w/ hard G as in "get", not soft G as in "general".
So while the word gerrymander is often pronounced with soft G, some sticklers may prefer hard G pronunciation.
Should we be surprised?
What does President Trump have to lose? Surely not reputation.
And who's paying for this revisionism?
Shiftless2
Well-known member
Re 1,793
In the past Trump has tried to argue that his payments with Stormy Daniels fell under the blanket protection that the Supreme Court had given him re official acts because he claimed that he'd mentioned them to an aide of some sort.
It is a common misconception among pro se litigants that federal courts can revisit and perhaps overturn a decision of the state courts. Only if a federal issue was part of a state court decision can the federal court review a decision by the state court.
In the past Trump has tried to argue that his payments with Stormy Daniels fell under the blanket protection that the Supreme Court had given him re official acts because he claimed that he'd mentioned them to an aide of some sort.